lmpx
.com
Home
Linux
MySQL
PHP
Perl
Python
XML
News
Home
News
news.gmane.io
gmane.os.openbsd.embedded
gmane.os.openbsd.embedded
124 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.
Re: Status of 2.1?
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:16:24 -0400
"Michael C. Ibarra" <
[email protected]
> • #124
Re: Wireless cards
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 07:16:46 -0600 (MDT)
Diana Eichert <
[email protected]
> • #123
Re: Wireless cards
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 06:01:33 -0400
"Michael C. Ibarra" <
[email protected]
> • #122
Wireless cards
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 21:21:28 -0700
Chuck Yerkes <
[email protected]
> • #121
Re: a brief story about your alternatives
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:31:00 -0700
Chuck Yerkes <
[email protected]
> • #120
Re: a brief story about your alternatives
Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:30:18 +1200
Nicholas Lee <
[email protected]
> • #119
Re: LibUtil patch
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 21:24:31 -0700
Chuck Yerkes <
[email protected]
> • #118
Re: LibUtil patch
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 03:26:22 +0100 (GMT)
Dirk Rosler <
[email protected]
> • #117
Greetings and whatsup...
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:20:33 -0400
ken <
[email protected]
> • #116
Re: a brief story about your alternatives
Fri, 02 Aug 2002 10:05:00 +0800
"clarence chan" <
[email protected]
> • #115
LibUtil patch
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:37:10 -0700
Chuck Yerkes <
[email protected]
> • #114
Re: a brief story about your alternatives
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 21:11:40 -0400
Michael <
[email protected]
> • #113
Re: a brief story about your alternatives
Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:14:42 -0700
Steve Pearlmutter <
[email protected]
> • #112
Re: a brief story about your alternatives
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:14:31 +1000
Shane J Pearson <
[email protected]
> • #111
Re: an important story about purchasing hardware from the embsd project
Fri, 2 Aug 2002 09:06:14 +1000
Shane J Pearson <
[email protected]
> • #110
Re: a brief story about your alternatives
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:55:07 -0700
Chuck Yerkes <
[email protected]
> • #109
Re: an important story about purchasing hardware from the embsd project
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:53:12 -0700
Chuck Yerkes <
[email protected]
> • #108
RE: a brief story about your alternatives
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 11:15:19 -0400
"Peter Masloch" <
[email protected]
> • #107
Re: an important story about purchasing hardware from the embsd project
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:14:29 -0700
Brad Murray <
[email protected]
> • #106
Re: a brief story about your alternatives
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 22:58:48 +0800
Andrew Shugg <
[email protected]
> • #105
Re: an important story about purchasing hardware from the embsd project
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 09:48:53 -0400
"Michael C. Ibarra" <
[email protected]
> • #104
Re: an important story about purchasing hardware from the embsd project
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 09:19:43 -0400
Michael <
[email protected]
> • #103
Re: an important story about purchasing hardware from the embsd project
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:22:11 +1000
Shane J Pearson <
[email protected]
> • #102
RE: an important story about purchasing hardware from the embsd project
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:06:32 -0500
"David Simmons" <
[email protected]
> • #101
a brief story about your alternatives
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:14:34 +0000
Leevon Reaves <
[email protected]
> • #100
an important story about purchasing hardware from the embsd project
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:54:24 +0000
Leevon Reaves <
[email protected]
> • #99
IPSec/VPN Hints
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:36:52 -0500
"David Simmons" <
[email protected]
> • #98
RE: IPSec vs. NAT vs. Route - got it working!!
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 09:13:19 -0500
"David Simmons" <
[email protected]
> • #97
Re: IPSec vs. NAT vs. Route
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 07:36:02 +0100 (GMT)
Dirk Rosler <
[email protected]
> • #96
Re: IPSec vs. NAT vs. Route
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:49:22 -0700
Chuck Yerkes <
[email protected]
> • #95
IPSec vs. NAT vs. Route
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:11:17 -0700
Stephen J Bevan <
[email protected]
> • #94
Re[2]: IPSec vs. NAT vs. Route
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 02:01:29 +0200
Gernot Poerner <
[email protected]
> • #93
RE: IPSec vs. NAT vs. Route
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:52:53 -0500
"David Simmons" <
[email protected]
> • #92
Re: IPSec vs. NAT vs. Route
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:31:07 -0700
Chuck Yerkes <
[email protected]
> • #91
IPSec vs. NAT vs. Route
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:52:53 -0500
"David Simmons" <
[email protected]
> • #90
RE: 2.1 (was: Re: New OpenSSH tarball coming for 2.0?)
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:29:32 -0400 (EDT)
Ken <
[email protected]
> • #89
RE: 2.1 (was: Re: New OpenSSH tarball coming for 2.0?)
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 13:54:16 -0500
"Justin Honold" <
[email protected]
> • #88
Re: 2.1 (was: Re: New OpenSSH tarball coming for 2.0?)
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:51:38 -0700
Steve Pearlmutter <
[email protected]
> • #87
RE: New OpenSSH tarball coming for 2.0?
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:50:07 -0400 (EDT)
Ken <
[email protected]
> • #86
RE: New OpenSSH tarball coming for 2.0?
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:25:13 -0500
"David Simmons" <
[email protected]
> • #85
New OpenSSH tarball coming for 2.0?
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 23:44:33 -0500
"David Simmons" <
[email protected]
> • #84
New Test Build
Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:03:49 -0400 (EDT)
Ken <
[email protected]
> • #83
emBSD and VPN problems
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:33:47 -0500
"David Simmons" <
[email protected]
> • #82
Re: 2.1 availability? (was: Re: Adding "mail" function?)
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:18:23 -0700
Steve Pearlmutter <
[email protected]
> • #81
Re: 2.1 availability? (was: Re: Adding "mail" function?)
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:47:21 -0400 (EDT)
Ken <
[email protected]
> • #80
Re: 2.1 availability? (was: Re: Adding "mail" function?)
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:52:51 -0400 (EDT)
Steven Vitale <
[email protected]
> • #79
OT - new embsd developer congrats ;-)
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 07:27:50 -0600 (MDT)
Diana Eichert <
[email protected]
> • #78
Re: 2.1 availability? (was: Re: Adding "mail" function?)
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:04:57 -0400 (EDT)
Ken <
[email protected]
> • #77
2.1 availability? (was: Re: Adding "mail" function?)
Tue, 09 Jul 2002 23:29:44 -0700
Steve Pearlmutter <
[email protected]
> • #76
new kid on the block...
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 15:03:44 -0500
"Justin Honold" <
[email protected]
> • #75