gmane.comp.java.mx4j.devel archive

1529 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 16). Latest articles →

[ mx4j-Bugs-1121911 ] addNotificationListener observed ObjectName cannot be null
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:50:13 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1628
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115215 ] CompositeType should throw IllegalArg if lengths differ
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:21:50 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1627
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116557 ] Parsing problems with MLet files
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:22:14 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1626
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121885 ] Notification status should be cleared when monitor stops
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:12:34 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1625
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115165 ] ReflectionExceptions are not wrapped
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:07:15 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1624
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121885 ] Notification status should be cleared when monitor stops
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:39:21 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1623
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121856 ] CounterMonitor should not notify if already able threshold
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:35:41 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1622
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121854 ] CounterMonitor value can be negative
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:35:54 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1621
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116557 ] Parsing problems with MLet files
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:26:56 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1620
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115165 ] ReflectionExceptions are not wrapped
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:02:48 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1619
[ mx4j-Bugs-1120313 ] Incompatible JSR160 implementations between mx4j & sun
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:59:49 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1618
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121856 ] CounterMonitor should not notify if already able threshold
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:53:26 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1617
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121854 ] CounterMonitor value can be negative
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:50:20 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1616
How to use an MX4J connector in J2SE 5
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:43:55 +0100
"Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> • #1615
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121849 ] MBeanPermission 4-arg form, null is same as "-"
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:43:22 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1614
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121849 ] MBeanPermission 4-arg form, null is same as "-"
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:41:40 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1613
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121843 ] RequiredModelMBean should have one notification broadcaster
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:37:26 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1612
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121844 ] RequiredModelMBean must list default notifications
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:37:40 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1611
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121844 ] RequiredModelMBean must list default notifications
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:29:14 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1610
[ mx4j-Bugs-1121843 ] RequiredModelMBean should have one notification broadcaster
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:27:20 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1609
[GUMP@brutus]: Project mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty (in module mx4j) failed
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:23:15 PST
Simone Bordet <[email protected]> • #1608
RE: Security risks with HESSIAN/BURLAP serializers
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:28:31 +0100
"Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> • #1607
[GUMP@brutus]: Project mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty (in module mx4j) failed
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 02:25:10 PST
Simone Bordet <[email protected]> • #1606
[GUMP@brutus]: Project mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty (in module mx4j) failed
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:25:20 PST
Simone Bordet <[email protected]> • #1605
Re: Default permission: "*" or "-"
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:36:41 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #1604
[ mx4j-Bugs-1120313 ] Incompatible JSR160 implementations between mx4j & sun
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:21:02 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1603
Security risks with HESSIAN/BURLAP serializers
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:57:12 -0800
"Yoke Lee" <[email protected]> • #1602
[ mx4j-Bugs-1120257 ] Several issues with DescriptorSupport
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:10:33 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1601
[ mx4j-Bugs-1120257 ] Several issues with DescriptorSupport
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:56:54 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1600
Re: Default permission: "*" or "-"
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:09:08 -0800
Jeremy Boynes <[email protected]> • #1599
Re: Default permission: "*" or "-"
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:00:13 +0100
Eamonn McManus <[email protected]> • #1598
Re: Default permission: "*" or "-"
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:38:15 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #1597
Re: Default permission: "*" or "-"
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:11:58 +0100
Luis-Miguel Alventosa <[email protected]> • #1596
[GUMP@brutus]: Project mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty (in module mx4j) failed
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 02:04:10 PST
Simone Bordet <[email protected]> • #1595
RE: Default permission: "*" or "-"
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:39:33 +0100
"Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> • #1594
Re: Default permission: "*" or "-"
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:14:54 +0100
Luis-Miguel Alventosa <[email protected]> • #1593
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115212 ] OpenMBeanInfoSupport has precise equals/hashcode
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 18:01:02 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1592
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116245 ] MBeanPermission implies is incorrect with wildcards
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:00:45 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1591
Default permission: "*" or "-"
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:46:36 -0800
Jeremy Boynes <[email protected]> • #1590
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115071 ] Incorrect default objectname for MLet
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:28:26 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1589
[ mx4j-Bugs-1119438 ] In MBeanPersmission, empty [] is allowed
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:17:18 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1588
[ mx4j-Bugs-1119438 ] In MBeanPersmission, empty [] is allowed
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:58:55 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1587
[ mx4j-Bugs-1119438 ] In MBeanPersmission, empty [] is allowed
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:17:16 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1586
[GUMP@brutus]: Project mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty (in module mx4j) failed
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 03:06:40 PST
Simone Bordet <[email protected]> • #1585
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116557 ] Parsing problems with MLet files
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:17:47 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1584
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116620 ] ModelMBeanInfo should not return null
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:07:19 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1583
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116623 ] ModelMBean resource type is case insensitive
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:03:48 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1582
[GUMP@brutus]: Project mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty (in module mx4j) failed
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:07:13 PST
Simone Bordet <[email protected]> • #1581
[ mx4j-Bugs-1119006 ] Attempt to create an abstract MBean throws wrong exception
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:37:35 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1580
[ mx4j-Bugs-1119006 ] Attempt to create an abstract MBean throws wrong exception
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:31:19 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1579
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115663 ] Intospection should return FQN; "is" is not a attr
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:38:38 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1578
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115215 ] CompositeType should throw IllegalArg if lengths differ
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:36:59 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1577
Re: RE: problem when MBean class is abstract
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:23:49 +0100
Eamonn McManus <[email protected]> • #1576
RE: Can values be negative for CounterMonitors?
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:11:01 +0100
"Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> • #1575
Re: Can values be negative for CounterMonitors?
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 12:25:37 +0100
Eamonn McManus <[email protected]> • #1574
Re: Can values be negative for CounterMonitors?
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:41:44 +0100
Luis-Miguel Alventosa <[email protected]> • #1573
RE: problem when MBean class is abstract
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:28:02 +0100
"Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> • #1572
RE: Can values be negative for CounterMonitors?
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:59:46 +0100
"Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> • #1571
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116623 ] ModelMBean resource type is case insensitive
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:56:37 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1570
RE: No Security in SOAPConnector as per JSR-160 ???
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:38:11 +0100
"Bordet, Simone" <[email protected]> • #1569
Can values be negative for CounterMonitors?
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:20:15 -0800
Jeremy Boynes <[email protected]> • #1568
Re: Do all tests pass with HEAD?
Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:11:38 -0800
Jeremy Boynes <[email protected]> • #1567
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115215 ] CompositeType should throw IllegalArg if lengths differ
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:47:06 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1566
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115589 ] ArrayType.isValue does not handle multidimensional arrays
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:33:51 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1565
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116245 ] MBeanPermission implies is incorrect with wildcards
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:13:24 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1564
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116450 ] spec ambiguity? security check for getDomains()
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:14:01 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1563
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115663 ] Intospection should return FQN; "is" is not a attr
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:24:53 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1562
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115663 ] Intospection should return FQN; "is" is not a attr
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:24:38 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1561
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115071 ] Incorrect default objectname for MLet
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:24:55 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1560
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115083 ] MBeanInfo missing classname is not compliant
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:56:34 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1559
Do all tests pass with HEAD?
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:15:29 -0800
Jeremy Boynes <[email protected]> • #1558
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115194 ] ObjectName should reject unterminated strings
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:39:09 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1557
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115194 ] ObjectName should reject unterminated strings
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:01:31 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1556
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115684 ] MBeanServerPermission must reject invalid names
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:41:10 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1555
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115684 ] MBeanServerPermission must reject invalid names
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:30:32 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1554
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115083 ] MBeanInfo missing classname is not compliant
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:28:01 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1553
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115071 ] Incorrect default objectname for MLet
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:16:32 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1552
[ mx4j-Bugs-1111695 ] java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:12:18 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1551
[ mx4j-Bugs-1118193 ] Incorrect handling of <arg type="object">
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:08:16 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1550
[ mx4j-Bugs-1118193 ] Incorrect handling of <arg type="object">
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:07:34 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1549
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116623 ] ModelMBean resource type is case insensitive
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 05:51:30 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1548
Re: Wrapping notification listeners?
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 14:45:42 +0100
Eamonn McManus <[email protected]> • #1547
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116450 ] spec ambiguity? security check for getDomains()
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 02:31:43 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1546
[GUMP@brutus]: Project mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty (in module mx4j) failed
Sun, 06 Feb 2005 02:29:08 PST
Simone Bordet <[email protected]> • #1545
[GUMP@brutus]: Project mx4j-tools-from-packaged-jetty (in module mx4j) failed
Sat, 05 Feb 2005 20:43:57 PST
Simone Bordet <[email protected]> • #1544
Wrapping notification listeners?
Sat, 05 Feb 2005 09:55:31 -0800
Jeremy Boynes <[email protected]> • #1543
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116623 ] ModelMBean resource type is case insensitive
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:23:19 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1542
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116620 ] ModelMBeanInfo should not return null
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 18:20:27 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1541
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116557 ] Parsing problems with MLet files
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 15:34:43 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1540
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116450 ] spec ambiguity? security check for getDomains()
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:23:20 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1539
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116245 ] MBeanPermission implies is incorrect with wildcards
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:35:41 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1538
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116245 ] MBeanPermission implies is incorrect with wildcards
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:21:36 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1537
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116245 ] MBeanPermission implies is incorrect with wildcards
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:25:36 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1536
[ mx4j-Bugs-1116245 ] MBeanPermission implies is incorrect with wildcards
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 07:28:06 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1535
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115684 ] MBeanServerPermission must reject invalid names
Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:55:25 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1534
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115663 ] Intospection should return FQN; "is" is not a attr
Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:30:53 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1533
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115589 ] ArrayType.isValue does not handle multidimensional arrays
Thu, 03 Feb 2005 09:30:41 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1532
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115215 ] CompositeType should throw IllegalArg if lengths differ
Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:37:39 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1531
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115212 ] OpenMBeanInfoSupport has precise equals/hashcode
Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:26:01 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1530
[ mx4j-Bugs-1115194 ] ObjectName should reject unterminated strings
Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:45:44 -0800
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> • #1529
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.