gmane.comp.java.objectweb.asm archive

1065 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 11). Latest articles →

Re: Patch for frame.merge()
Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:41:28 +0100
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3953
Patch for frame.merge()
Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:32:29 -0800
Prashant Deva <[email protected]> • #3952
Re: Frames computation with ClassWriter.getCommonSuperClass()
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:33:37 +0100
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3951
Frames computation with ClassWriter.getCommonSuperClass()
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:34:39 +0100
Clement Escoffier <[email protected]> • #3950
asm 4.0 bug: Getting ClassFormatError: Extra bytes at end of class file
Mon, 19 Dec 2011 04:27:42 -0800
Prashant Deva <[email protected]> • #3949
Re: Re: EmptyVisitor replacement in asm 4.0
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:14:59 -0800
Prashant Deva <[email protected]> • #3948
Re: EmptyVisitor replacement in asm 4.0
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:46:30 +0100
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3947
EmptyVisitor replacement in asm 4.0
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:24:58 -0800
Prashant Deva <[email protected]> • #3946
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ASM 4.0 released
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:03:48 +0100
Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> • #3945
Re: NegativeArraySizeException
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:28:15 +0100
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3944
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ASM 4.0 released
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:52:19 +0100
Andreas Sewe <[email protected]> • #3943
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ASM 4.0 released
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:04:05 +0100
Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> • #3942
NegativeArraySizeException
Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:11:46 +0100
Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> • #3941
visitLocalVariable
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:59:39 +0100 (CET)
althea <[email protected]> • #3940
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ASM 4.0 released
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:44:58 +0000
Martin Ellis <[email protected]> • #3939
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ASM 4.0 released
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:38:13 +0100 (CET)
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3938
Re: Use of Analyzer<...> and Frame<...>
Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:15:52 +0100
Remi Forax <[email protected]> • #3937
Use of Analyzer<...> and Frame<...>
Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:40:00 +0100 (CET)
althea <[email protected]> • #3936
Re: sudden class loading in asm
Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:25:54 -0500
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3935
sudden class loading in asm
Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:22:23 +0100
Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> • #3934
Re: Alias analysis using asm framework
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 16:39:56 -0500
Eliot Moss <[email protected]> • #3933
Alias analysis using asm framework
Sat, 3 Dec 2011 13:34:27 -0800
Prashant Deva <[email protected]> • #3932
Re: TraceClassVisitor#main missing in asm4
Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:26:01 -0500
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3931
TraceClassVisitor#main missing in asm4
Sat, 03 Dec 2011 00:17:16 +0100
Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> • #3930
Re: static analysis by asm
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:15:20 +0100
"Andrey Loskutov" <[email protected]> • #3929
static analysis by asm
Thu, 1 Dec 2011 04:53:52 +0100 (CET)
althea <[email protected]> • #3928
Re: Re: Re: ClassWriter#visit now final
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:16:16 +0100
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3927
Re: Re: ClassWriter#visit now final
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:29:42 +0100
Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> • #3926
Re: ClassWriter#visit now final
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:55:37 +0100
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3925
Re: Re: Re: Re: ASM 4.0 released
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:50:25 +0100
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3924
Re: Re: Re: Re: ASM 4.0 released
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:08:51 +0100
Florent BENOIT <[email protected]> • #3923
ClassWriter#visit now final
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 02:44:25 +0100
Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> • #3922
Re: Re: Re: ASM 4.0 released
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:15:06 +0100
Jochen Theodorou <[email protected]> • #3921
Re: Re: ASM 4.0 released
Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:54:39 +0100
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> • #3920
Re: Local variables map
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:38:07 +0100
"Markus Heiden" <[email protected]> • #3919
Local variables map
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 13:45:39 +0000
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #3918
ASM 4.0 vs. FindBugs vs...
Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:57:40 -0500
Jess Holle <[email protected]> • #3917
Re: ASM 4.0 released
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:43:57 +0000
Martin Ellis <[email protected]> • #3916
ASM 4.0 released
Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:40:24 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3915
Re: Bug in code generation by asm.tree?
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:55:28 +0300
Yaroslav Kavenchuk <[email protected]> • #3914
Re: ASM 4.0 RC2: Revisiting the NOP ATHROW bug
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:08:16 -0600
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #3913
Re: ASM 4.0 RC2: Revisiting the NOP ATHROW bug
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:30:55 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3912
Re: ASM 4.0 RC2: Revisiting the NOP ATHROW bug
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:30:12 -0600
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #3911
Re: ASM 4.0 RC2: Revisiting the NOP ATHROW bug
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:53:38 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3910
Re: ASM 4.0 RC2: Revisiting the NOP ATHROW bug
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:49:53 -0600
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #3909
Re: ASM 4.0 RC2: Revisiting the NOP ATHROW bug
Sun, 23 Oct 2011 08:55:52 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3908
ASM 4.0 RC2: Revisiting the NOP ATHROW bug
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 19:28:54 -0600
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #3907
Re: verification error
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:39:53 -0400
Eliot Moss <[email protected]> • #3906
verification error
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:47:42 +0200
"luc peuvrier at home" <[email protected]> • #3905
Re: Is the ASM 4.0 final release on schedule?
Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:29:37 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3904
Is the ASM 4.0 final release on schedule?
Thu, 20 Oct 2011 22:04:16 +0100
"Zeeb, Jeffrey" <[email protected]> • #3903
Bug in code generation by asm.tree?
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:13:40 +0300
Yaroslav Kavenchuk <[email protected]> • #3902
Re: Re: Instrumentation in native code
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:58:50 -0700
Prashant Deva <[email protected]> • #3901
Re: Instrumentation in native code
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:19:28 -0400
Nathan Ricci <[email protected]> • #3900
Re: Re: Instrumentation in native code
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:12:35 -0400
Eliot Moss <[email protected]> • #3899
Re: Re: Instrumentation in native code
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:27:19 +0200
Andreas Sewe <[email protected]> • #3898
Re: Instrumentation in native code
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 06:01:00 +0000
Nikita Salnikov-Tarnovski <[email protected]> • #3897
Re: Instrumentation in native code
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 23:10:45 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3896
Instrumentation in native code
Sun, 9 Oct 2011 12:54:01 -0700
Prashant Deva <[email protected]> • #3895
Re: Re: New bug posted + patch for Analyzer
Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:51:58 +0200
Eric Bruneton <[email protected]> • #3894
Re: Problem reloading a local variable in ASM
Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:30:07 +0200
Rémi Forax <[email protected]> • #3893
Problem reloading a local variable in ASM
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 14:22:16 -0700
Nemo Caviani <[email protected]> • #3892
Re: New bug posted + patch for Analyzer
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 05:26:31 -0500
Kevin Hoffman <[email protected]> • #3891
New bug posted + patch for Analyzer
Mon, 3 Oct 2011 22:45:12 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3890
Re: ASM 4.0 RC2 released
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:25:23 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3889
Extending ASM's flow analysis
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:45:02 -0400
Eliot Moss <[email protected]> • #3888
Re: Backwards compatibility between 3.x releases
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:46:24 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3887
Re: Re: ASM 4.0 RC2 released
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:41:48 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3886
Re: ASM 4.0 RC2 released
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:57:02 +0100
Martin Ellis <[email protected]> • #3885
Backwards compatibility between 3.x releases
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:36:24 +0000
Florian Weimer <[email protected]> • #3884
Re: ASM 4.0 RC2 released
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:21:18 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3883
Re: Errors caused by already instrumented classes
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:15:20 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3882
Re: Errors caused by already instrumented classes
Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:13:25 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3881
Re: Using asm from jruby
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 17:09:09 -0700
James Moore <[email protected]> • #3880
Re: Using asm from jruby
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:27:22 -0500
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> • #3879
Using asm from jruby
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:32:04 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3878
RE: ASM 4.0 RC2 released
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:21:54 +0100
"Zeeb, Jeffrey" <[email protected]> • #3877
Errors caused by already instrumented classes
Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:41:22 +0200
Lukas Marek <[email protected]> • #3876
Re: Problems with too large methods
Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:26:23 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3875
Problems with too large methods
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:39:48 +0000
Nikita Salnikov-Tarnovski <[email protected]> • #3874
Re: Re: Need help with source code line number
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:18:02 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3873
Re: Need help with source code line number
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:14:08 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3872
Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:37:51 -0500
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> • #3871
Need help with source code line number
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:37:00 +0200 (CEST)
<[email protected]> • #3870
Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:15:10 -0500
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> • #3869
Do I need to balance?
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:10:25 +1000
James Ladd <[email protected]> • #3868
ASM 4.0 RC2 released
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:21:59 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3867
Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:14:03 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3866
Re: Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:33:25 -0500
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> • #3865
Re: Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:31:27 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3864
Re: Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:43:14 -0500
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> • #3863
Re: Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:04:44 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3862
Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:02:01 -0500
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> • #3861
Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:07:07 -0500
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> • #3860
Re: Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:27:50 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3859
Possible stack frame calc dead code bug again!
Thu, 8 Sep 2011 22:21:10 -0500
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> • #3858
Re: Re: Re: ASM4 / Java 7
Thu, 8 Sep 2011 21:35:16 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3857
RE: Re: Re: ASM4 / Java 7
Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:21:01 +0100
"Zeeb, Jeffrey" <[email protected]> • #3856
Re: Re: Suggestion for Printer API in ASM 4.0
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:13:22 -0400
Eugene Kuleshov <[email protected]> • #3855
Re: Suggestion for Printer API in ASM 4.0
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:00:50 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #3854
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.