gmane.comp.windows.devel.dotnet.advocacy

46 articles on record, showing the most recent 46.

Expiration of your subscription to the DOTNET-ADVOCACY list
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 06:00:02 -0700
"L-Soft list server at DevelopMentor (1.8e)" <[email protected]> • #46
.NET in CNET
Sat, 12 Oct 2002 00:02:36 +0200
Davide Marcato <[email protected]> • #45
Renewal of your subscription to the DOTNET-ADVOCACY list
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:00:02 -0700
"L-Soft list server at DevelopMentor (1.8e)" <[email protected]> • #44
ANN: Web Services DevCon Almost Closed to Registration
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:00:21 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #43
ANN: Web Services DevCon Filling Fast
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:33:58 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #42
Re: ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:00:38 -0400
Sam Gentile <[email protected]> • #41
Re: ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:51:09 +0200
"Thomas N. Schwarz" <[email protected]> • #40
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:20:10 -0500
"McClelland, Russ" <[email protected]> • #39
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:07:29 -0400
Mike Schinkel <[email protected]> • #38
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:21:02 -0500
"Schram, James" <[email protected]> • #37
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:08:01 -0500
"Schram, James" <[email protected]> • #36
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:41:51 -0500
"McClelland, Russ" <[email protected]> • #35
Re: .NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 14:39:41 +0100
Andrew Stopford <[email protected]> • #34
.NET vs. Java
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 08:04:21 -0500
"Schram, James" <[email protected]> • #33
Re: ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 08:05:12 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #32
Re: ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Sun, 4 Aug 2002 17:31:42 +1000
Mitch Denny <[email protected]> • #31
ANN: "Spend A Day With .NET" Coding Contest on 8/30/02
Sat, 3 Aug 2002 18:33:46 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #30
Re: Infoworld Special on VB Programmers moving to VB.Net
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:38:47 -0400
"Jeffrey A. Little" <[email protected]> • #29
Infoworld Special on VB Programmers moving to VB.Net
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:37:57 -0700
Adwait Ullal <[email protected]> • #28
Need volunteers to port Qt# to windows :-)
Fri, 26 Jul 2002 16:51:04 -0400
Adam Treat <[email protected]> • #27
Hi
Sat, 20 Jul 2002 10:13:40 -0400
Yvonne Singer <[email protected]> • #26
Thanks for all the great session ideas!
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:32:18 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #25
Re: How can I find a good .Net consultant?
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:41:55 -0400
Mike Schinkel <[email protected]> • #24
How can I find a good .Net consultant?
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:18:56 -0500
"Wright, Warren" <[email protected]> • #23
Final call for web services sessions/speakers
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 19:06:02 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #22
SPOUT: Object vs. XML
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 20:22:12 -0700
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #21
Re: Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:57:40 -0400
Sam Gentile <[email protected]> • #20
Microsoft Response to Gartner Report (was: "Re: Cost of migrating to .Net")
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:12:54 -0700
"Ari Bixhorn (Microsoft)" <[email protected]> • #19
Re: Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:55:50 -0400
"Sills, Adam" <[email protected]> • #18
Re: Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:14:18 -0700
"Brian G. Rice" <[email protected]> • #17
Re: Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:04:08 -0600
Brad Wilson <[email protected]> • #16
Cost of migrating to .Net
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:02:03 -0400
Anthony Skipper <[email protected]> • #15
software library business model
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:23:00 -0700
john williams <[email protected]> • #14
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Wed, 22 May 2002 14:04:05 -0700
Doug Ransom <[email protected]> • #13
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Tue, 21 May 2002 20:31:43 -0600
Brad Wilson <[email protected]> • #12
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Tue, 21 May 2002 15:02:47 -0700
Doug Ransom <[email protected]> • #11
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Tue, 21 May 2002 14:33:42 -0700
Doug Ransom <[email protected]> • #10
Re: [DOTNET] Constructive criticisms of C# and .NET FW
Tue, 21 May 2002 13:50:39 -0700
Russ McClelland <[email protected]> • #9
ANN: Don Box's keynote at the Web Services DevCon now available!
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:04:39 -0500
Chris Sells <[email protected]> • #8
Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:50:53 +0100
Andrew Stopford <[email protected]> • #7
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 20:28:13 -0400
Sam Gentile <[email protected]> • #6
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Tue, 9 Apr 2002 08:02:46 -0700
Gunnar Skogsholm <[email protected]> • #5
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 13:52:19 -0400
Eric Hill <[email protected]> • #4
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:20:47 -0700
Joshua Allen <[email protected]> • #3
Re: Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:29:15 -0400
"Sam R. Akhtar" <[email protected]> • #2
Report: Sun and Oracle Bribed Attorneys to Keep MS Lawsuit Alive - This is an outrage!
Sat, 6 Apr 2002 17:30:35 -0500
Sam Gentile <[email protected]> • #1