gmane.ietf.imaa archive

350 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: quick & dirty alternate addresses
Mon, 01 Dec 2003 08:39:24 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #703
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:12:15 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #702
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:59:30 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #701
Re: quick & dirty alternate addresses
Mon, 01 Dec 2003 09:41:53 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #700
Re: quick & dirty alternate addresses
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:51:24 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #699
quick & dirty alternate addresses
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:05:14 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #698
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 00:26:34 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #697
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Mon, 1 Dec 2003 04:23:08 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #696
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Mon, 01 Dec 2003 03:56:23 +0100
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #695
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:46:52 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #694
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:35:18 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #693
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:19:43 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #692
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:14:12 +0100
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #691
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sun, 30 Nov 2003 02:28:18 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #690
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:50:24 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #689
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sat, 29 Nov 2003 13:08:07 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #688
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:43:20 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #687
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sat, 29 Nov 2003 12:48:34 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #686
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Sat, 29 Nov 2003 02:08:49 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #685
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:01:38 -0800
"Mark Davis" <[email protected]> • #684
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:48:14 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #683
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:33:38 +0100
Thomas Roessler <[email protected]> • #682
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:39:02 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #681
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:45:25 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #680
Re: First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Thu, 27 Nov 2003 20:50:27 +0100
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #679
First strawman for UTF-8 headers proposal
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:57:57 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #678
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:18:52 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #677
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:28:40 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #676
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:56:52 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #675
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:53:20 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #674
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 14:39:27 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #673
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:56:13 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #672
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:06:52 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #671
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:30:24 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #670
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 03:46:39 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #669
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Sun, 23 Nov 2003 20:06:51 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #668
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:20:50 +0800
James Seng <[email protected]> • #667
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Sun, 23 Nov 2003 05:46:35 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #666
presentation about email address i18n and mailto:
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:34:53 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #665
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:34:28 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #664
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:21:36 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #663
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:12:12 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #662
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:06:58 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #661
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:08:13 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #660
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:02:41 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #659
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:53:53 +0100
Thomas Roessler <[email protected]> • #658
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 02:27:22 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #657
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 06:56:08 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #656
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:02:55 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #655
IDN Open Source
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:37:20 +0800
James Seng <[email protected]> • #654
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:07:39 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #653
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:01:34 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #652
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:48:57 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #651
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:36:59 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #650
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:02:15 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #649
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:59:04 -0700
Steve Hole <[email protected]> • #648
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:55:11 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #647
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:43:49 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #646
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 08:29:32 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #645
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:55:42 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #644
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 03:08:26 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #643
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:55:44 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #642
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:45:56 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #641
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Sat, 15 Nov 2003 20:19:24 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #640
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:02:06 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #639
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:22:52 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #638
Re: rough sketch of a potential solution
Sun, 16 Nov 2003 01:26:31 +0100
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #637
rough sketch of a potential solution
Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:29:42 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #636
Re: what is the real problem?
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:18:41 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #635
Re: what is the real problem?
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 18:07:51 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #634
Re: what is the real problem?
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:13:30 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #633
Re: what is the real problem?
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 04:05:36 -0500
Martin Duerst <[email protected]> • #632
Re: what is the real problem?
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 00:51:52 +0100
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #631
Re: what is the real problem?
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:57:03 -0500
"John Cowan" <[email protected]> • #630
Re: what is the real problem?
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:23:19 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #629
Re: what is the real problem?
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 11:02:31 -0500
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> • #628
Re: what is the real problem?
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 04:29:12 +0100
"J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <[email protected]> • #627
Re: comments on yesterday's presentations
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 02:43:13 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #626
Re: what is the real problem?
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:01:19 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #625
Re: what is the real problem?
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:48:04 -0500
John Cowan <[email protected]> • #624
Re: Preliminary minutes from the meeting in Minneapolis
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:45:51 +0800
James Seng <[email protected]> • #623
Re: what is the real problem?
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:23:52 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #622
Re: what is the real problem?
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:15:06 -0500
"John Cowan" <[email protected]> • #621
Re: Preliminary minutes from the meeting in Minneapolis
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:06:51 -0600
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #620
what is the real problem?
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:14:52 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #619
comments on yesterday's presentations
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:44:34 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #618
Re: Preliminary minutes from the meeting in Minneapolis
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:50:33 -0600
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #617
Preliminary minutes from the meeting in Minneapolis
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 07:30:03 -0600
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #616
Re: Comments on draft-hoffman-imaa-03
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 03:54:05 +0000
"Adam M. Costello" <[email protected]> • #615
Comments on draft-hoffman-imaa-03
Tue, 11 Nov 2003 03:30:38 +0100
Marcos Sanz/Denic <[email protected]> • #614
Re: Taxonomy of proposals so far
Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:29:35 +0100
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #613
Taxonomy of proposals so far
Tue, 4 Nov 2003 20:47:40 -0800
Paul Hoffman / IMC <[email protected]> • #612
LEA Bottom LIne (was Re: IEA Bottom Line)
Wed, 05 Nov 2003 02:05:36 +0900
masataka ohta <[email protected]> • #611
Re: IEA Bottom Line
Mon, 03 Nov 2003 15:03:20 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #610
Re: IEA Bottom Line
Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:46:49 -0500
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> • #609
Re: IEA Bottom Line
Mon, 03 Nov 2003 14:21:19 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #608
Re: IEA Bottom Line
Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:24:39 -0500
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> • #607
IEA Bottom Line (was: Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA))
Mon, 03 Nov 2003 12:19:56 -0500
John C Klensin <[email protected]> • #606
Re: FYI: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 22:05:44 +0100
Markus Stumpf <[email protected]> • #605
RE: BOF on Internationalized Email Addresses (IEA)
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:45:54 +0200
"Jony Rosenne" <[email protected]> • #604
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.