gmane.ietf.iptel archive

159 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 2). Latest articles →

Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Thu, 23 May 2002 18:04:31 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #60
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Thu, 23 May 2002 12:54:33 EDT
[email protected] • #59
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Thu, 23 May 2002 15:42:02 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #58
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Thu, 23 May 2002 10:04:49 -0400
Michael Hammer <[email protected]> • #57
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Thu, 23 May 2002 10:02:35 -0400
Michael Hammer <[email protected]> • #56
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Thu, 23 May 2002 00:07:03 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #55
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 22 May 2002 18:38:49 -0400
Michael Hammer <[email protected]> • #54
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 22 May 2002 21:54:42 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #53
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 22 May 2002 15:55:56 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #52
RE: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 22 May 2002 15:28:06 -0400
"Brett Tate" <[email protected]> • #51
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 22 May 2002 14:40:38 EDT
[email protected] • #50
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 22 May 2002 14:36:26 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #49
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 22 May 2002 19:07:11 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #48
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 22 May 2002 17:34:10 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #47
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 22 May 2002 03:24:47 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #46
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 21:22:20 -0400
Flemming Andreasen <[email protected]> • #45
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 21:14:02 -0400
Flemming Andreasen <[email protected]> • #44
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 15:52:07 -0400
Michael Hammer <[email protected]> • #43
RE: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 14:09:34 -0500
"Crizza, Roberto" <[email protected]> • #42
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 13:14:47 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #41
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 18:06:32 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #40
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 11:41:53 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #39
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 11:34:13 EDT
[email protected] • #38
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 11:15:57 -0400
Flemming Andreasen <[email protected]> • #37
RFC2806bis 04
Tue, 21 May 2002 11:02:37 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #36
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 10:57:38 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #35
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 08:42:50 -0400
Flemming Andreasen <[email protected]> • #34
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 08:27:45 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #33
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 08:17:33 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #32
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 07:48:36 -0400
Flemming Andreasen <[email protected]> • #31
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Tue, 21 May 2002 10:28:57 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #30
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Mon, 20 May 2002 23:13:18 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #29
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Mon, 20 May 2002 22:43:21 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #28
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Mon, 20 May 2002 14:04:26 -0400
Flemming Andreasen <[email protected]> • #27
Re: CPL Doubts
Mon, 20 May 2002 09:22:30 -0400
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #26
CPL Doubts
Mon, 20 May 2002 08:24:57 -0400
"Crizza, Roberto" <[email protected]> • #25
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Wed, 15 May 2002 19:27:47 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #24
Re: 2806bis-3 comments
Wed, 15 May 2002 19:27:31 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #23
2806bis-3 comments
Wed, 15 May 2002 10:47:10 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #22
2806bis comments
Wed, 15 May 2002 10:44:22 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #21
Re: Comments on RFC2806bis
Sun, 12 May 2002 15:34:43 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #20
Re: tel:
Sat, 11 May 2002 03:26:56 +0100
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #19
Re: tel:
Fri, 10 May 2002 22:18:17 -0400
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]> • #18
tel:
Sat, 11 May 2002 02:05:41 +0000 (UTC)
Lawrence Conroy <[email protected]> • #17
Virus was 2.1 Language Support
Wed, 8 May 2002 08:39:01 -0400
"Tom-PT Taylor" <[email protected]> • #16
RE: 2.1 Language Support
Wed, 8 May 2002 12:33:27 +0200
[email protected] • #15
Re: Doubt in CPL Scripts
Thu, 2 May 2002 14:45:40 -0400
Jonathan Lennox <[email protected]> • #13
Doubt in CPL Scripts
Thu, 2 May 2002 12:10:44 +0530
"Nagarajan.D" <[email protected]> • #12
Re: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 15:15:28 -0400
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #11
Re: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Mon, 15 Apr 2002 14:06:25 EDT
[email protected] • #10
Re: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Mon, 15 Apr 2002 09:56:20 -0400
Michael Hammer <[email protected]> • #9
Re: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 22:49:50 EDT
[email protected] • #8
Re: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:23:45 -0700
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #7
Re: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:53:55 -0400
Michael Hammer <[email protected]> • #6
Re: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Bradner <[email protected]> • #5
Re: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:32:53 -0400
"Bob Penfield" <[email protected]> • #4
RE: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 11:18:41 -0400 (EDT)
Scott Bradner <[email protected]> • #3
RE: carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 09:16:45 -0400
"David R. Oran" <[email protected]> • #2
carrier codes in draft-rs-trip-gw-03.txt
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:25:48 -0500
"Bob Penfield" <[email protected]> • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.