gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal archive
372 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →
Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:00:54 -0500Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:48:15 -0700Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 19:37:03 +0100Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 12:19:02 -0600Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:30:03 +0100Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:20:08 +0100Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:56:19 +0100Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:30:54 +0100License conditions for a specific file in praat
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:36:58 +0100Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 10:16:28 +0000Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project
Tue, 17 Mar 2026 07:41:41 +0100Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Mon, 16 Mar 2026 18:42:34 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Mon, 16 Mar 2026 19:31:18 -0400Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project
Mon, 16 Mar 2026 15:22:25 -0700Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project
Mon, 16 Mar 2026 14:40:03 -0700Re: ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility
Mon, 16 Mar 2026 20:45:38 +0100Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project
Mon, 16 Mar 2026 20:47:16 +0100Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project
Mon, 16 Mar 2026 12:15:35 -0700GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project
Sun, 15 Mar 2026 11:06:12 +0100Re: ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 11:05:24 -0700ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 11:15:46 +0100ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility
Sat, 14 Mar 2026 11:15:31 +0100Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:26:50 -0600Re: Age Verification
Thu, 12 Mar 2026 23:09:31 +0100Re: Age Verification
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 19:12:40 -0500Re: Age Verification
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:59:52 -0700Re: Age Verification
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:07:00 -0500Re: Age Verification
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:56:05 -0400Age Verification
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:18:44 -0400Re: Age Verification
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:26:07 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 23:09:24 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 20:59:05 -0700Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 16:04:08 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 13:58:20 -0600Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Tue, 10 Mar 2026 03:33:56 +0000Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:11:57 -0400Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Mon, 9 Mar 2026 22:02:28 -0400Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Mon, 09 Mar 2026 19:39:52 -0600Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Thu, 5 Mar 2026 20:46:46 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Wed, 04 Mar 2026 15:39:57 -0700Re: Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Wed, 4 Mar 2026 15:30:58 -0600Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Wed, 4 Mar 2026 14:43:45 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Wed, 4 Mar 2026 09:52:54 -0600Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states
Wed, 4 Mar 2026 12:38:23 +0000Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Wed, 4 Mar 2026 11:51:24 +0100Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Wed, 04 Mar 2026 09:08:48 +0100On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states
Tue, 3 Mar 2026 20:38:08 -0800Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Tue, 3 Mar 2026 19:39:16 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Tue, 3 Mar 2026 19:32:00 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Tue, 3 Mar 2026 16:48:19 +0100Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Tue, 3 Mar 2026 15:56:03 +0100Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Mon, 2 Mar 2026 10:36:52 -0800Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Mon, 02 Mar 2026 07:08:19 +0000Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 17:10:40 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 14:02:56 -0800Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 01 Mar 2026 16:46:20 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 16:26:30 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 16:21:34 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 16:08:37 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 21:51:15 +0100Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 15:53:23 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 15:42:56 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 20:23:05 +0000Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 12:21:17 -0800Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 15:12:09 -0500Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 15:13:13 -0500On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states
Sun, 1 Mar 2026 14:48:00 -0500Re: Distribution of CDDL binaries in contrib
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 19:55:43 +0100Distribution of CDDL binaries in contrib
Sat, 28 Feb 2026 17:43:17 +0000Re: Updating the PHP license
Fri, 27 Feb 2026 23:48:13 +0100Re: Updating the PHP license
Thu, 26 Feb 2026 23:13:23 -0600Re: Software implementing patented techniques
Sun, 15 Feb 2026 16:30:33 +0100Re: Software implementing patented techniques
Sat, 14 Feb 2026 13:47:30 -0800Re: Software implementing patented techniques
Sat, 14 Feb 2026 21:40:02 +0100Re: Software implementing patented techniques
Sat, 14 Feb 2026 11:38:25 -0800Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Sun, 15 Feb 2026 03:44:01 +0900Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Fri, 13 Feb 2026 21:42:46 +0100Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Fri, 13 Feb 2026 13:37:25 -0700Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Fri, 13 Feb 2026 20:57:38 +0100Re: Software implementing patented techniques
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 17:23:42 +0100Re: Software implementing patented techniques
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:31:58 +0200Re: Software implementing patented techniques
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 11:18:37 +0000Software implementing patented techniques
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:39:55 +0200Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Fri, 30 Jan 2026 10:27:50 -0800Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Thu, 29 Jan 2026 16:17:47 -0700Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Thu, 29 Jan 2026 07:38:10 -0500Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Thu, 29 Jan 2026 09:41:19 -0000 (UTC)Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:50:38 +0900SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG?
Wed, 28 Jan 2026 22:14:39 -0500Re: BSD-4-clause with different development organizations
Mon, 12 Jan 2026 09:20:50 +0100Re: BSD-4-clause with different development organizations
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 15:26:47 -0700BSD-4-clause with different development organizations
Sat, 10 Jan 2026 23:20:44 +0100RE
Wed, 31 Dec 2025 07:51:38 +0000Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package
Tue, 23 Dec 2025 14:25:07 -0700Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package
Tue, 23 Dec 2025 22:22:00 +0100Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package
Tue, 23 Dec 2025 13:23:32 -0700Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package
Tue, 23 Dec 2025 20:31:29 +0100Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package
Tue, 23 Dec 2025 19:38:15 +0100Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package
Tue, 23 Dec 2025 11:04:31 -0700Question about icons related to a trademark in a package
Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:47:10 +0100
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.