gmane.linux.jpackage.general archive

998 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 10). Latest articles →

Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:29:22 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14469
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:15:13 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14468
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 00:13:01 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14467
Re: Why do some SRPM's use "mvn" and not "mvn --offline" for safety?
Sat, 12 Mar 2011 18:53:22 -0500
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #14466
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:10:15 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14465
Why do some SRPM's use "mvn" and not "mvn --offline" for safety?
Sat, 12 Mar 2011 17:50:52 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14464
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 12 Mar 2011 00:12:14 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14463
Jpackage 6.0 SRPM's that still have checksum problems on RHEL 5
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:10:17 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14462
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:15:35 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14461
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:13:34 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14460
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 00:14:04 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14459
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 00:15:50 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14458
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 00:11:17 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14457
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 6 Mar 2011 00:11:21 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14456
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 5 Mar 2011 00:14:04 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14455
Re: What is the right Java upgrade path for RHEL 5 users?
Fri, 04 Mar 2011 09:54:04 -0500
DM Smith <dmsmith555-/[email protected]> • #14454
Re: What is the right Java upgrade path for RHEL 5 users?
Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:59:49 +0000
Will Tatam <[email protected]> • #14453
Re: What is the right Java upgrade path for RHEL 5 users?
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:25:59 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14452
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:19:54 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14451
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 00:15:25 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14450
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:42:55 +0000
Will Tatam <[email protected]> • #14449
Re: What is the right Java upgrade path for RHEL 5 users?
Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:47:24 +0000
Will Tatam <[email protected]> • #14448
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 00:15:58 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14447
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 2 Mar 2011 00:16:11 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14446
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:22:27 -0500
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #14445
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:14:51 -0500
Davlet Panech <[email protected]> • #14444
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 15:21:21 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14443
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:22:59 -0500
Davlet Panech <[email protected]> • #14442
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 13:09:08 -0500
Davlet Panech <[email protected]> • #14441
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 00:17:14 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14440
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:13:37 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14439
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 27 Feb 2011 00:17:42 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14438
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 00:15:40 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14437
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:19:15 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14436
Re: What is the right Java upgrade path for RHEL 5 users?
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:08:39 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14435
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:14:13 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14434
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:15:00 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14433
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 22 Feb 2011 00:16:36 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14432
Re: Bundling ActiveMQ version 5.x in RPM
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:19:01 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14431
Re: What is the right Java upgrade path for RHEL 5 users?
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:55:11 -0500
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #14430
Re: Bundling ActiveMQ version 5.x in RPM
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:50:20 -0500
David Walluck <[email protected]> • #14429
What is the right Java upgrade path for RHEL 5 users?
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:39:53 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14428
Bundling ActiveMQ version 5.x in RPM
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:07:31 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14427
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 00:14:19 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14426
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:17:55 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14425
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:20:54 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14424
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:16:15 +0100
Boris Folgmann <[email protected]> • #14423
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:19:47 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14422
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:30:38 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14421
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:47:27 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14420
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:14:25 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14419
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:13:12 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14418
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:13:20 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14417
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 20:23:23 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14416
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 12 Feb 2011 00:12:44 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14415
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:05:27 +0100
Boris Folgmann <[email protected]> • #14414
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:56:41 +0100
Boris Folgmann <[email protected]> • #14413
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:15:08 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14412
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:12:42 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14411
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 9 Feb 2011 00:13:55 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14410
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 00:10:39 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14409
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 7 Feb 2011 00:12:16 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14408
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 6 Feb 2011 00:11:50 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14407
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Sat, 5 Feb 2011 15:29:48 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14406
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:26:17 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14405
Re: Java 1.6.0_23
Sat, 5 Feb 2011 08:02:27 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #14404
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 5 Feb 2011 00:13:01 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14403
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 4 Feb 2011 00:12:35 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14402
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:17:12 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14401
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:15:15 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14400
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:16:05 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14399
Java 1.6.0_23
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:03:01 +0100
Boris Folgmann <[email protected]> • #14398
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:12:48 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14397
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:12:38 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14396
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 29 Jan 2011 00:15:41 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14395
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:17:41 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14394
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:13:41 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14393
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:17:28 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14392
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:12:49 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14391
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:11:17 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14390
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 00:10:17 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14389
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:12:55 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14388
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:11:38 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14387
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:14:44 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14386
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:13:47 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14385
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:12:14 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14384
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:10:36 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14383
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:10:54 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14382
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 00:12:16 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14381
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:13:04 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14380
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:13:28 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14379
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:12:21 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14378
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:15:01 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14377
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:12:00 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14376
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sun, 9 Jan 2011 00:13:47 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14375
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:14:39 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14374
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Fri, 7 Jan 2011 00:12:22 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14373
Your Bugzilla bug list needs attention.
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 00:15:24 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #14372
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.