gmane.mail.qmail.ldap archive

386 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: maximum number of message in queue
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:08:06 +0200
Ismail YENIGUL <[email protected]> • #11584
Re: maximum number of message in queue
Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:24:57 +0000
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #11583
maximum number of message in queue
Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:43:01 +0800
"Dika Ye" <[email protected]> • #11582
qmail-todo search in ldap
Mon, 3 Jan 2011 05:27:11 -0800 (PST)
stefan oprea <[email protected]> • #11581
Re: want local delivery to mailAlternateAddress; else relay message to another qmail server
Sun, 02 Jan 2011 03:50:44 +0100
Alain Wolf <[email protected]> • #11580
Re: want local delivery to mailAlternateAddress; else relay message to another qmail server
Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:17:45 -0200
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[email protected]> • #11579
Re: want local delivery to mailAlternateAddress; else relay message to another qmail server
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:14:39 +0800
Bobby Reyes <[email protected]> • #11578
Re: want local delivery to mailAlternateAddress; else relay message to another qmail server
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:49:22 -0200
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[email protected]> • #11577
Re: want local delivery to mailAlternateAddress; else relay message to another qmail server
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:35:53 +0800
Bobby Reyes <[email protected]> • #11576
Re: want local delivery to mailAlternateAddress; else relay message to another qmail server
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:15:02 +0100
Matthias Blaser <[email protected]> • #11575
Re: want local delivery to mailAlternateAddress; else relay message to another qmail server
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:10:46 -0200
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[email protected]> • #11574
want local delivery to mailAlternateAddress; else relay message to another qmail server
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:40:47 +0800
Bobby Reyes <[email protected]> • #11573
Re: qmail groups
Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:19:37 +0100
Tobias Hensel <[email protected]> • #11572
Re: qmail groups
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:31:28 -0200
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[email protected]> • #11571
qmail groups
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 11:17:33 +0100
Tobias Hensel <[email protected]> • #11570
qmail relay to specify domain name
Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:01:41 +0800
"Dika Ye" <[email protected]> • #11569
Re: qmail-ldap and GFS
Thu, 04 Nov 2010 20:55:43 +0000
Eduardo Costa <[email protected]> • #11568
Re: qmail-ldap and GFS
Thu, 4 Nov 2010 09:01:02 +0100
David Rodríguez Fernández <[email protected]> • #11567
Re: qmail-ldap and GFS
Thu, 4 Nov 2010 08:30:28 +0100
Carlos García Gómez <[email protected]> • #11566
Re: qmail-ldap and GFS
Thu, 4 Nov 2010 00:04:16 +0200
Ibrahim Harrani <[email protected]> • #11565
Re: qmail-ldap and GFS
Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:37:17 +0100
Enrico Valsecchi <[email protected]> • #11564
Re: qmail-ldap and GFS
Wed, 03 Nov 2010 11:08:22 -0700
Jimmy Brake <[email protected]> • #11563
Re: qmail-ldap and GFS
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:43:29 +0100
David Rodríguez Fernández <[email protected]> • #11562
qmail-ldap and GFS
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 17:25:16 +0200
Ibrahim Harrani <[email protected]> • #11561
Re: LDAP log???
Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:43:08 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #11560
Re: LDAP log???
Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:44:47 +0200
"Jimmy S." <[email protected]> • #11559
Re: LDAP log???
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:32:45 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #11558
Re: LDAP log???
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:16:30 +0200
"Jimmy S." <[email protected]> • #11557
Re: LDAP log???
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:00:48 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #11556
Re: LDAP log???
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:22:25 +0200
"Jimmy S." <[email protected]> • #11555
Re: temporary verify error
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:47:32 +0200
"Jimmy S." <[email protected]> • #11554
EarthLink DNS server problems resolved
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 21:49:46 -0400
"J.T. Moore" <[email protected]> • #11553
Re: temporary verify error
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:41:28 +0200
"Jimmy S." <[email protected]> • #11552
Re: LDAP log???
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:09:25 +0200
Shepherd Nhongo <[email protected]> • #11551
Re: temporary verify error
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:44:14 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #11550
temporary verify error
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:12:44 +0200
"Jimmy S." <[email protected]> • #11549
Re: LDAP log???
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:46:35 +0200
"Jimmy S." <[email protected]> • #11548
Re: LDAP log???
Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:26:09 +0200
"Jimmy S." <[email protected]> • #11547
Re: Anyone else having trouble sending mail the EarthLink domains?
Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:20:05 +0200
Matthias Blaser <[email protected]> • #11546
Re: Anyone else having trouble sending mail the EarthLink domains?
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:54:09 -0400
"J.T. Moore" <[email protected]> • #11545
Re: Anyone else having trouble sending mail the EarthLink domains?
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:24:20 +0200
Matthias Blaser <[email protected]> • #11544
Anyone else having trouble sending mail the EarthLink domains?
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 00:52:18 -0400
"J.T. Moore" <[email protected]> • #11543
Re: LDAP log???
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:50:11 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #11542
Re: LDAP log???
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:22:17 -0400 (EDT)
"Russell Simpkins" <[email protected]> • #11541
Re: LDAP log???
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:23:13 +0200
"Jimmy S." <[email protected]> • #11540
Re: LDAP log???
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:32:21 +0200
Shepherd Nhongo <[email protected]> • #11539
LDAP log???
Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:59:02 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11538
Re: Change e-mail address of an existent user
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:55:38 +0400
"Gennady G. Marchenko" <[email protected]> • #11537
Change e-mail address of an existent user
Fri, 24 Sep 2010 12:57:44 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11536
qmail ldap with shupp toaster
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:48:32 +0800
"Qmail List" <[email protected]> • #11535
Re: Is it limit of maximum recipients in single message ?
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:53:11 -0400 (EDT)
"Russell Simpkins" <[email protected]> • #11534
Is it limit of maximum recipients in single message ?
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 11:05:03 +0800
"Dika Ye" <[email protected]> • #11533
Re: AUTHed smtp USER+BADRCPTTO=DENY, why?
Thu, 2 Sep 2010 17:19:45 +0300 (EEST)
"Tomas Kuliavas" <[email protected]> • #11532
Re: AUTHed smtp USER+BADRCPTTO=DENY, why?
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:06:34 +0400
"Gennady G. Marchenko" <[email protected]> • #11531
Re: AUTHed smtp USER+BADRCPTTO=DENY, why?
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 17:00:56 +0400
"Gennady G. Marchenko" <[email protected]> • #11530
Re: AUTHed smtp USER+BADRCPTTO=DENY, why?
Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:33:15 +0300 (EEST)
"Tomas Kuliavas" <[email protected]> • #11529
AUTHed smtp USER+BADRCPTTO=DENY, why?
Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:23:36 +0400
"Gennady G. Marchenko" <[email protected]> • #11528
Re: RBL and many DNS querys to my dns
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:12:07 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11527
RBL and many DNS querys to my dns
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:36:23 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11526
Re: SENDERCHECK patch
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:50:13 +0200
Robert Müller <[email protected]> • #11525
[patch] LDIF-formatted schema file for OpenLDAP
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:57:30 -0400
Brian T Glenn <[email protected]> • #11524
Re: env SMTPAUTHUSER (possible added to main patch)
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 00:49:22 +0100
Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas <[email protected]> • #11523
Re: env SMTPAUTHUSER (possible added to main patch)
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:50:24 -0300
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[email protected]> • #11522
Re: More than 3.000 smtp sessions actives!
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:01:03 -0300
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[email protected]> • #11521
Re: bigbrother control help
Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:47:05 -0300
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[email protected]> • #11520
bigbrother control help
Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:12:42 +0400
Mario Remy Almeida <[email protected]> • #11519
env SMTPAUTHUSER (possible added to main patch)
Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:10:53 +0100
Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas <[email protected]> • #11518
how to get the user that authenticates
Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:21:09 +0100
Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas <[email protected]> • #11517
how to get TCPREMOTEINFO
Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:40:28 +0100
Nicolas de Bari Embriz Garcia Rojas <[email protected]> • #11516
Re: AW: Drop connection when tcpserver -c limit is reached, Is it posible?
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:21:08 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11515
AW: Drop connection when tcpserver -c limit is reached, Is it posible?
Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:58:37 +0200
"Berger Stefan" <[email protected]> • #11514
Re: Drop connection when tcpserver -c limit is reached, Is it posible?
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:53:25 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11513
Many SMTP connections when use SMTP550DISCONNECT, Is correct my theory?
Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:33:12 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11512
Drop connection when tcpserver -c limit is reached, Is it posible?
Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:06:21 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11511
Re: More than 3.000 smtp sessions actives!
Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:34:31 +0300 (EEST)
"Tomas Kuliavas" <[email protected]> • #11510
Re: More than 3.000 smtp sessions actives!
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:48:08 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11509
Re: More than 3.000 smtp sessions actives!
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:31:36 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11508
Re: More than 3.000 smtp sessions actives!
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:05:18 +0300 (EEST)
"Tomas Kuliavas" <[email protected]> • #11507
Re: More than 3.000 smtp sessions actives!
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:50:36 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11506
Re: More than 3.000 smtp sessions actives!
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:47:09 +0300 (EEST)
"Tomas Kuliavas" <[email protected]> • #11505
More than 3.000 smtp sessions actives!
Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:19:02 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11504
Lot of SYN_RECV connections due to SPAM connections...
Sat, 17 Jul 2010 00:17:37 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11503
wildcards in smtproutes file???
Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:25:44 +0200
Jimmy Spam <[email protected]> • #11502
Re: Bug in pbsdbd hash function?
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:57:00 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #11501
Re: Bug in pbsdbd hash function?
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 10:28:06 -0400
Edward Capriolo <[email protected]> • #11500
Bug in pbsdbd hash function?
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:37:36 +0200
Diego Chaparro González <[email protected]> • #11499
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.