gmane.network.e-smith.devel archive

380 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

RE: Announce rdiff-backup HowTo - Initial
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:59:11 +0100
"Michiel Blotwijk" <[email protected]> • #3448
Re: Source packages
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 23:11:12 -0800
Mike Sensney <[email protected]> • #3447
GPL
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:34:48 +1000
"Peter Lambert" <[email protected]> • #3446
Re: Source packages
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:05:13 -0500
[email protected] • #3445
Contribs.org's view of the future <OFFTOPIC>
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:32:51 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3444
Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 23:15:21 -0500
"David Trask" <[email protected]> • #3443
Re: Source packages
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:52:24 -0500
"Michael P. Soulier" <[email protected]> • #3442
Re: Source packages
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:38:46 -0500
[email protected] • #3441
Re: Source packages
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:09:13 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3440
RE: OpenH323 and SME
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:44:19 +1300
"Jon Blakely CTS-Howick" <[email protected]> • #3439
Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:36:35 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3438
Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:28:59 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3437
Re: Source packages
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:10:29 -0500
[email protected] • #3436
Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:00:12 -0500
George Siegel <[email protected]> • #3435
yum (Re: OpenH323 and SME)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:51:07 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3434
Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:45:56 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3433
Re: yum repository
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:46:16 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3432
Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:43:33 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3431
Re: Source packages
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:37:12 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3430
Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:28:03 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3429
RE: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:26:12 -0700
"Craig Jensen" <[email protected]> • #3428
Re: Source packages (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Something of interest)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:07:57 -0500
[email protected] • #3427
Re: Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:47:11 -0500
George Siegel <[email protected]> • #3426
Re: Announce rdiff-backup HowTo - Initial
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:10:04 -0500
Noah Genner <[email protected]> • #3425
Re: Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.n et
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:24:12 -0500
John Cusick <[email protected]> • #3424
Re: Announce rdiff-backup HowTo - Initial
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:19:08 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3423
Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:20:54 -0500
John Cusick <[email protected]> • #3422
Re: Something of interest
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:14:54 -0500
[email protected] • #3421
Announce rdiff-backup HowTo - Initial
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:45:37 -0500
Noah Genner <[email protected]> • #3420
Re: Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.n et
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:29:36 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3419
Re: Licenses (was RE: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:34:18 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3418
Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:39:06 -0500
Rich Lafferty <[email protected]> • #3417
Re: Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.n et
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:36:18 -0500
Rich Lafferty <[email protected]> • #3416
Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:26:30 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3415
Licenses (was RE: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:17:39 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3414
RE: Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.n et
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:13:32 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3413
RE: Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:06:34 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3412
RE: Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:59:03 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3411
Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:16:12 -0600
Jason Watson <[email protected]> • #3410
RE: Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:39:05 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3409
Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:33:20 +0100
"Grand'Pa" <[email protected]> • #3408
Re: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:03:55 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3407
Re: Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:05:19 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3406
Re: Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:05:07 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3405
Re: WAS: Re: OpenH323 and SME
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:42:10 -0500
Rich Lafferty <[email protected]> • #3404
WAS: Re: OpenH323 and SME
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:34:41 +1100
Graeme Robinson <[email protected]> • #3403
Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:18:36 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3402
Re: Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:21:30 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3401
RE: irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:19:19 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3400
Most suitable update mechanism (was Re: CVS dump of current SME...)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:05:52 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3399
yum repository (was Re: CVS dump of current SME source and compiling environment)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:04:37 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3398
irc channel #contribs.org on freenode.net
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:07:09 -0600
Jason Watson <[email protected]> • #3397
Re: ...and now for a current dev question...
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:46:18 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3396
Re: Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:27:34 -0500
Noah Genner <[email protected]> • #3395
...and now for a current dev question...
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:40:53 -0700
"Craig Jensen" <[email protected]> • #3394
Re: Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:09:07 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3393
Re: Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:01:54 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3392
concern over the tone of list of late
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:05:33 -0000
"Julian Luton" <[email protected]> • #3391
Re: Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:53:49 -0500
Dan Brown <[email protected]> • #3390
Re: Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:46:02 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3389
Re: Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:36:53 -0500
[email protected] • #3388
RE: OpenH323 and SME
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:13:24 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3387
Re: OpenH323 and SME
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:03:49 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3386
Re: OpenH323 and SME
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:00:08 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3385
Devinfo is moving
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:17:00 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3384
Perl package statuses (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:17:00 -0500
Gordon Rowell <[email protected]> • #3383
Source packages (was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Something of interest)
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:11:24 -0500
Gordon Rowell <[email protected]> • #3382
Re: Migrating devinfo...
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:18:11 -0500
Rich Lafferty <[email protected]> • #3381
Migrating devinfo...
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:04:20 -0500
[email protected] • #3380
OpenH323 and SME
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:15:19 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3379
Re: Something of interest
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:33:25 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3378
Re: Something of interest
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 08:30:58 -0500
[email protected] • #3377
Re: Something of interest
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:25:54 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3376
Something of interest
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:16:40 +1300
Tivon Coles <[email protected]> • #3375
Re: Problem with creating a panel
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:26:19 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3374
Problem with creating a panel
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 01:03:38 +0100
"Thor Anthrax" <[email protected]> • #3373
Re: sysconfig ReleaseVersion
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:58:45 -0700
"Shad L. Lords" <[email protected]> • #3372
Re: CVS dump of current SME source and compiling environment
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:44:32 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3371
sysconfig ReleaseVersion
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:23:51 -0600
"Darrell May" <[email protected]> • #3370
Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:11:12 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3369
Re: Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:08:42 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3368
Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:01:20 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3367
Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 21:59:23 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3366
Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:50:43 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3365
Re: What version of RH is SME 6 based on?
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:45:50 -0500
"Michael P. Soulier" <[email protected]> • #3364
What version of RH is SME 6 based on?
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:35:33 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3363
Re: FormMagick Panels
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:28:14 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3362
Re: CVS dump of current SME source and compiling environment
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:15:44 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3361
RE: CVS dump of current SME source and compiling environment
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 11:08:21 -0700
"Craig Jensen" <[email protected]> • #3360
Re: FormMagick Panels
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:51:15 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3359
Re: FormMagick Panels
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:51:38 +0000 (GMT)
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3358
Re: FormMagick Panels
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 08:39:52 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3357
Re: FormMagick Panels
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:53:01 +0000
Dick Morrell <[email protected]> • #3356
CVS dump of current SME source and compiling environment
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:52:45 -0500
"Courchesne, Andre" <[email protected]> • #3355
Re: FormMagick Panels
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:42:34 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3354
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Privoxy - privacy enhancing proxy
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:11:50 +0100
"Thor Anthrax" <[email protected]> • #3353
RE: FormMagick Panels
Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:49:45 +0100
"Bearne, Paul" <[email protected]> • #3352
Re: FormMagick Panels
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 18:26:31 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3351
Re: E-smith to Debian?
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 17:24:57 +0100 (CET)
Robert van den Aker <[email protected]> • #3350
Re: Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:59:03 +0000
Craig Genner <[email protected]> • #3349
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.