gmane.network.e-smith.devel archive

386 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

RE: E-smith to Debian?
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:21:17 -0500
"Scott Duncan" <[email protected]> • #3348
Re: E-smith to Debian?
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 02:11:36 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3347
RE: E-smith to Debian?
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:59:14 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3346
Re: E-smith to Debian?
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:56:40 -0500
[email protected] • #3345
Re: E-smith to Debian?
Sat, 13 Dec 2003 01:00:43 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3344
E-smith to Debian?
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:54:16 -0500
TekUnsupported <[email protected]> • #3343
RE: Custom ISO Howto
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:46:56 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3342
RE: Custom ISO Howto
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:54:11 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3341
Custom ISO Howto
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:37:19 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3340
RE: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:00:56 -0400
"Ernesto Lorenz" <[email protected]> • #3339
Re: Missing SME 6.0 SRPMS (links)
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:59:59 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3338
RE: e-smith/sme at sourceforge ?
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 06:22:21 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3337
Re: e-smith/sme at sourceforge ?
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:50:35 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3336
Re: e-smith/sme at sourceforge ?
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:50:53 +0000
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3335
e-smith/sme at sourceforge ?
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:42:55 +0100
Peter Schubert <[email protected]> • #3334
Missing SME 6.0 SRPMS (links)
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:26:52 +0100
"Filippo Carletti" <[email protected]> • #3333
Re: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:37:20 +1000
"Joseph Armstrong" <[email protected]> • #3332
Re: Some thoughts on e-smith's Purpose and Architecture
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:30:33 +0000
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3331
RE: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:51:00 -0600
"Darrell May" <[email protected]> • #3330
Some thoughts on e-smith's Purpose and Architecture
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 00:19:03 -0600
Dub Dublin <[email protected]> • #3329
Re: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 04:48:38 +0000
Richard Morrell <[email protected]> • #3328
Re: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:44:47 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3327
Re: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 19:11:32 -0800
[email protected] • #3326
RE: RE: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:45:07 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3325
RE: Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:40:36 +1000
"Peter Lambert" <[email protected]> • #3324
Not enough Indians (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Boss)
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:26:05 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3323
Re: FormMagick Panels
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:01:02 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3322
RE: HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:24:19 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3321
RE: HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso (fwd)
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:47:43 -0500 (EST)
"Peter Samuel" <[email protected]> • #3320
Re: FormMagick Panels
Fri, 12 Dec 2003 09:17:57 +1300
Tivon Coles <[email protected]> • #3319
Re: FormMagick Panels
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:16:29 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3318
Re: FormMagick Panels
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:02:02 -0500
"Michael P. Soulier" <[email protected]> • #3317
Re: FormMagick Panels
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:34:02 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3316
RE: HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:22:50 -0600
"Darrell May" <[email protected]> • #3315
Re: FormMagick Panels
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:59:22 -0500
"Michael P. Soulier" <[email protected]> • #3314
Re: Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:44:14 -0500
"Michael P. Soulier" <[email protected]> • #3313
Re: HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:59:10 -0500
Dan Brown <[email protected]> • #3312
Re: Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:43:07 +0000
Inhabitant of Zion <[email protected]> • #3311
RE: HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:57:25 -0600
"Darrell May" <[email protected]> • #3310
FormMagick Panels
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:34:31 -0800
[email protected] • #3309
Re: HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:14:36 -0500 (EST)
"Peter Samuel" <[email protected]> • #3308
Re: Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 06:06:16 +0100
Michael Herger <[email protected]> • #3307
Re: Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:18:57 -0500
"Michael P. Soulier" <[email protected]> • #3306
HowTo rsync smeserver-6.0unsupported.iso
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:12:14 -0600
"Darrell May" <[email protected]> • #3305
Re: Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:08:58 -0800
Des Dougan <[email protected]> • #3304
RE: Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 00:36:56 +0100
Timothée Bastin <[email protected]> • #3303
Re: Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:36:21 +0000
Craig Genner <[email protected]> • #3302
Mitel Networks announces the availability of SME Server 6.0 unsupported developer release
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:49:56 -0500
[email protected] • #3301
RE: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)]
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:02:44 +1300
"Rob Wellesley" <[email protected]> • #3300
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)]
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:16:28 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3299
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)]
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:44:33 +0100
"Nick Warr" <[email protected]> • #3298
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)]
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:27:48 +1300
Tivon Coles <[email protected]> • #3297
RE: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)]
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:52:23 +1300
"Rob Wellesley" <[email protected]> • #3296
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)]
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:58:08 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3295
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)]
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:44:16 +1300
Tivon Coles <[email protected]> • #3294
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Privoxy - privacy enhancing proxy
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:15:11 +0100
"Thor Anthrax" <[email protected]> • #3293
RE: Survey response
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:08:51 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3292
Re: Survey response
Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:04:28 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3291
New to the list
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:54:27 -0500
"David Trask" <[email protected]> • #3290
Survey response
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:51:08 -0500
"David Trask" <[email protected]> • #3289
RE: A quick survey
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:34:17 -0500
"John Lewis" <[email protected]> • #3288
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo]Rough development plan)]
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:26:03 -0600
dalen <[email protected]> • #3287
Bug process [was RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Start with small steps]
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:15:00 -0600
"Darrell May" <[email protected]> • #3286
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo]Rough development plan)]
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:24:05 -0600 (CST)
[email protected] • #3285
Re: A quick survey
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:19:17 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3284
Re: A quick survey
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 09:05:00 -0600
dalen <[email protected]> • #3283
Re: Kolab and LDAP (was Re: Suggestion for SME...)
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:49:01 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3282
RE: Kolab and LDAP (was Re: Suggestion for SME...)
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:46:37 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3281
A quick survey
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:45:45 +0100
"Bearne, Paul" <[email protected]> • #3280
Re: Kolab and LDAP (was Re: Suggestion for SME...)
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 09:30:29 -0500
John Cusick <[email protected]> • #3279
Re: Phorum help for contribs.org
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 06:03:47 -0800
Greg Zartman <[email protected]> • #3278
RE: Phorum help for contribs.org
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 06:17:29 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3277
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)]
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 08:01:49 -0500
George Siegel <[email protected]> • #3276
Re: Kolab and LDAP (was Re: Suggestion for SME...)
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 07:45:40 -0500
John Cusick <[email protected]> • #3275
RE: Phorum help for contribs.org
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:03:32 +0100
"Michiel Blotwijk" <[email protected]> • #3274
Re: Phorum help for contribs.org
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:12:48 -0000
"Ed Form" <[email protected]> • #3273
RE: Kolab and LDAP (was Re: Suggestion for SME...)
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 07:58:53 +0200
"Brandon Friedman" <[email protected]> • #3272
Re: Boss
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 22:15:04 -0600
dalen <[email protected]> • #3271
Re: Kolab and LDAP (was Re: Suggestion for SME...)
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:47:54 -0700 (MST)
Donovan Arellano <[email protected]> • #3270
Kolab and LDAP (was Re: Suggestion for SME...)
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:31:29 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3269
SME's IMAP server (was RE: Suggestion for SME...)
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:27:01 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3268
Separate gateway functionality (Re: Suggestion for SME...)
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:58:54 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3267
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:01:14 +1100
Laurent DINCLAUX <[email protected]> • #3266
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 01:48:29 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3265
RE: A system update tool (was Re: Rough development plan)
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:49:42 -0800
"Joe Fernandez" <[email protected]> • #3264
A system update tool (was Re: Rough development plan)
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:40:54 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3263
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:36:55 +1100
Laurent DINCLAUX <[email protected]> • #3262
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 01:22:02 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3261
Re: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 11:17:06 +1100
Laurent DINCLAUX <[email protected]> • #3260
RE: Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:01:36 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3259
Start with small steps (Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Rough development plan)
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:54:49 -0500 (EST)
Charlie Brady <[email protected]> • #3258
Re: Boss
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:49:17 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3257
RE: Boss
Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:48:13 -0500
John Cusick <[email protected]> • #3256
RE: Boss
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:32:13 -0700
"Jeff Coleman" <[email protected]> • #3255
New forum section on contribs.org
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:26:38 +0100
Hsing-Foo Wang <[email protected]> • #3254
RE: Boss
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 17:06:01 -0600
"Darrell May" <[email protected]> • #3253
Re: Rough development plan
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:33:42 +1030
"Stewart Evans" <[email protected]> • #3252
Re: Rough development plan
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:25:13 +1030
"Stewart Evans" <[email protected]> • #3251
Re: Rough development plan
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 00:38:38 +0200
"Dean Mumby" <[email protected]> • #3250
Re: Rough development plan
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 09:01:56 +1100
Laurent DINCLAUX <[email protected]> • #3249
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.