perl.bootstrap archive

389 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: RFC draft: RFC's to use POD
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:07:47 -0400
[email protected] (Ted Ashton) • #912
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:09:02 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #911
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 16:58:40 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #910
Re: perl 6 requirements
31 Jul 2000 11:53:00 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #909
Re: RFC draft: RFC's to use POD
31 Jul 2000 11:50:01 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #908
Re: So...you want a working group
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:46:23 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #907
ZDNet article on Perl 6
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:56:26 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #906
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:40:14 -0700
[email protected] (Glenn Linderman) • #905
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 16:08:34 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #904
How can I help with Perl6
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:09:44 -0400
[email protected] (Ala Qumsieh) • #903
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 16:00:04 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #902
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:54:11 -0400
[email protected] (John Porter) • #901
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:58:41 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #900
Variant perls (was Re: Working Group Proposal)
31 Jul 2000 10:39:58 -0400
[email protected] ((Andrew Greene)) • #899
Re: RFC draft: RFC's to use POD
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:28:18 -0400
[email protected] (Edwin Wiles) • #898
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 23:24:20 +1000
[email protected] • #897
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:55:31 +0100
[email protected] (Alan Burlison) • #896
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:54:16 +0100
[email protected] (Alan Burlison) • #895
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:38:11 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #894
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:39:21 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #893
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:35:02 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #892
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 13:28:05 +0100
[email protected] (Alan Burlison) • #891
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 08:27:00 -0400
[email protected] ("Grant M.") • #890
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:14:59 GMT
[email protected] ("Ed Mills") • #889
Re: which lists are up?
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 20:20:37 +0900
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #888
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:17:58 +0100
[email protected] (Hildo Biersma) • #887
Re: Working Group Proposal
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:51:18 -0400
[email protected] ("Grant M.") • #886
Re: perl 6 requirements
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 20:26:59 +1000
[email protected] • #885
Re: RFC draft: RFC's to use POD
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:38:26 +0200
[email protected] (Dominic Dunlop) • #884
Re: Working Group Proposal
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 22:56:22 -0400
[email protected] (Steve Simmons) • #883
RFC draft: RFC's to use POD
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 16:59:50 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #882
Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 17:56:57 -0400
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #881
Re: So...you want a working group
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 12:44:09 +0200
[email protected] (Jesús Quiroga) • #880
Re: which lists are up?
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 03:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #879
Re: So...you want a working group
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 06:15:24 +0200
[email protected] (Jesús Quiroga) • #878
Re: which lists are up?
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 17:15:09 +0900
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #877
Re: So...you want a working group
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 08:31:38 +0200
[email protected] (Jesús Quiroga) • #876
Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 09:23:20 +0300
[email protected] ("Roman M . Parparov") • #875
Re: which lists are up?
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 00:21:51 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #874
Re: Initial Structure
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 01:58:37 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #873
Re: So...you want a working group
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 01:56:21 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #872
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 01:49:48 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #871
Re: which lists are up?
Sun, 30 Jul 2000 14:52:10 +1000
[email protected] • #870
Re: which lists are up?
30 Jul 2000 00:13:51 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #869
Re: "RFC" structure (was Re: Initial Structure )
30 Jul 2000 00:04:13 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #868
Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:23:03 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #867
Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:16:09 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #866
Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:13:26 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #865
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:12:44 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #864
Re: "RFC" structure (was Re: Initial Structure )
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:08:42 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #863
Re: Initial Structure
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 21:01:39 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #862
Re: So...you want a working group
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 20:51:45 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #861
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 14:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (John Tobey) • #860
Re: So...you want a working group
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:48:32 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #859
Re: So...you want a working group
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:34:38 -0400
[email protected] ("Kurt D. Starsinic") • #858
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:38:07 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #857
Re: So...you want a working group
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 11:20:55 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #856
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 07:38:50 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #855
Re: which lists are up?
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 02:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #854
which lists are up?
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 02:39:32 -0400
[email protected] (Uri Guttman) • #853
Re: Lists, sublists & filters [Was: [[email protected]: Glad I am not on bootstrap]]
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:25:49 -0400
[email protected] (Barrie Slaymaker) • #852
Re: So...you want a working group
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 14:46:41 +0900
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #851
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 23:15:15 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #850
So...you want a working group
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 23:14:00 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #849
Re: message board system
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #848
Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 19:32:54 -0400
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #847
Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 07:57:19 -0400
[email protected] (kevin lenzo) • #846
Re: Possible conflict of interest?
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 07:45:35 -0400
[email protected] (kevin lenzo) • #845
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 19:10:02 -0400
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #844
Re: Lists, sublists & filters [Was: [[email protected]: Glad I am not on bootstrap]]
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:30:53 -0400
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #843
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:54:24 +0100
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) • #842
Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:51:22 +0100
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) • #841
Re: message board system
28 Jul 2000 14:19:50 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #840
Re: The 0.5 Release of Sapphire Is Available
Sat, 29 Jul 2000 05:46:19 +0900
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #839
Re: message board system
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:43:13 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #838
Re: message board system
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:04:12 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #837
Re: Mailing lists and RFCs
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 12:21:04 -0700
[email protected] ("Randy J. Ray") • #836
Re: Initial Structure
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 12:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (horos) • #835
Re: message board system
28 Jul 2000 11:55:38 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #834
Re: source control
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #539
Re: Voting/Decision making guidelines
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #538
Re: Obscuring code?
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:52:54 -0700
[email protected] • #537
Re: What about many many mailing lists?
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #536
Re: Obscuring code?
25 Jul 2000 15:19:59 -0700
[email protected] (Russ Allbery) • #535
Re: Obscuring code?
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:12:20 -0700
[email protected] • #534
Re: What about many many mailing lists?
25 Jul 2000 17:55:28 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #533
Re: List for Perl 6 syntax?
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 22:30:49 +0100
[email protected] ("M.J.T. Guy") • #532
Re: Working Group Proposal
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 21:50:17 +0100
[email protected] (Hugo) • #531
Re: Backward Compatibility (was Re: List for Perl 6 syntax?)
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 17:37:25 -0400
[email protected] (Joshua N Pritikin) • #530
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.