gmane.comp.archivers.star.user archive

398 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: VOLHDR or something
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:04:30 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #489
Re: VOLHDR or something
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:04:30 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #488
Re: VOLHDR or something
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:53:45 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #487
Re: VOLHDR or something
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:04:30 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #486
Re: VOLHDR or something
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:12:46 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #485
Re: VOLHDR or something
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:10:28 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #484
Re: VOLHDR or something
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:56:40 +0100
"Ruud Baart" <[email protected]> • #483
Re: VOLHDR or something
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:14:14 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #482
Re: VOLHDR or something
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:34:49 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #481
Re: VOLHDR or something
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:34:32 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #480
Re: VOLHDR or something
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:34:01 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #479
Re: VOLHDR or something
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:24:14 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #478
VOLHDR or something
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:35:51 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #477
Re: Newbie: star exit codes
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:46:56 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #476
Using star and fsr
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:39:47 -0500
"Buttles, Wayne" <[email protected]> • #475
Re: Newbie: star exit codes
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:55:21 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #474
Newbie: star exit codes
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:56:24 -0800 (PST)
prasad jlv <[email protected]> • #473
Newbie: star exit codes
Sat, 10 Dec 2005 09:27:23 -0800 (PST)
prasad jlv <[email protected]> • #472
Newbie: star exit codes
Sat, 10 Dec 2005 09:25:25 -0800 (PST)
prasad jlv <[email protected]> • #471
Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:12:11 +0000
Francois Vigneron <[email protected]> • #470
Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:53:36 +0000
Francois Vigneron <[email protected]> • #469
Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:33:42 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #468
Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:09:31 +0000
Francois Vigneron <[email protected]> • #467
Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:16:30 +0100
[email protected] • #466
Re: Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:09:17 +0000
Francois Vigneron <[email protected]> • #465
Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 16:43:18 +0100
[email protected] • #464
Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:45:05 +0000
Francois Vigneron <[email protected]> • #463
Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:31:16 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #462
Re: compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:22:12 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #461
compiling STAR staticaly under Linux
Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:55:17 +0000
Francois Vigneron <[email protected]> • #460
Re: Problems with pattern matching
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:02:26 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #459
Re: Problems with pattern matching
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:48:58 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #458
Re: Problems with pattern matching
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:46:10 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #457
Re: Problems with pattern matching
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:41:32 +0100
Fabio Muzzi <[email protected]> • #456
Problems with pattern matching
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:55:10 +0100
Fabio Muzzi <[email protected]> • #455
Re: Smaller fs=x is better?!?
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:22:53 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #454
Re: Working star backup script
Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:33:21 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #453
Re: Smaller fs=x is better?!?
Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:34:33 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #452
Smaller fs=x is better?!?
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:09:04 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #451
Re: Working star backup script
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:07:27 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #450
Re: Working star backup script
Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:51:48 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #449
Re: Working star backup script
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 13:41:38 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #448
Re: Working star backup script
Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:59:02 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #447
Working star backup script
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:19:50 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #446
star/sfind The Marriage of two powerful programs
Wed, 02 Nov 2005 00:16:41 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #445
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:40:47 +0100
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #444
Re: Exclude dir as string parameter
Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:08:21 +0100
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #443
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:29:39 +0200
"Felix E. Klee" <[email protected]> • #442
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:47:24 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #441
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:47:19 +0200
"Felix E. Klee" <[email protected]> • #440
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:31:35 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #439
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:04:28 +0200
"Felix E. Klee" <[email protected]> • #438
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:52:11 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #437
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:11:17 +0200
"Felix E. Klee" <[email protected]> • #436
Re: Exclude dir as string parameter
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:43:15 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #435
Re: Exclude dir as string parameter
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:51:30 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #434
Re: Exclude dir as string parameter
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:15:01 +0200
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #433
Re: Exclude dir as string parameter
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:00:49 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #432
How to know backup or verify is done well
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:46:01 +0200
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #431
Exclude dir as string parameter
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 08:43:48 +0200
"Zoran Ljubisic" <[email protected]> • #430
Re: star warnings about ACLs and sockets
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:23:23 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #429
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:47:57 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #428
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:13:55 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #427
Re: star warnings about ACLs and sockets
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:29:28 -0700
Akop Pogosian <[email protected]> • #426
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:47:41 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #425
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:20:59 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #424
Re: star warnings about ACLs and sockets
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:05:46 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #423
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:07:22 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #422
Re: star warnings about ACLs and sockets
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:52:33 -0700
Akop Pogosian <[email protected]> • #421
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:24:37 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #420
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:59:25 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #419
Re: Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:45:43 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #418
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:43:04 +0200
[email protected] • #417
Re: star warnings about ACLs and sockets
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:17:29 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #416
Re: Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:20:19 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #415
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:15:28 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #414
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:07:09 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #413
Re: star warnings about ACLs and sockets
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:35:20 -0700
Akop Pogosian <[email protected]> • #412
Re: Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:16:40 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #411
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:59:31 +0200
[email protected] • #410
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:03:04 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #409
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:31:35 +0200
"Felix E. Klee" <[email protected]> • #408
Re: Extracting a single directory from a partial incremental dump?
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:21:25 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #407
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:04:49 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #406
Re: star warnings about ACLs and sockets
Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:59:45 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #405
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:17:35 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #404
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:20:15 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #403
Re: star warnings about ACLs and sockets
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:24:40 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #402
star warnings about ACLs and sockets
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:10:54 -0700
Akop Pogosian <[email protected]> • #401
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:32:33 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #400
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:47:59 +0200
[email protected] • #399
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:42:03 -0500
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #398
Re: Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:10:47 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #397
Re: Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:57:16 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #396
Re: Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:37:02 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #395
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:26:47 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #394
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:20:04 +0200
Joerg Schilling <[email protected]> • #393
Re: Perfomance problem backupscript (more details and tests)
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:56:41 +0200
[email protected] • #392
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.