gmane.comp.file-systems.openafs.freebsd archive

173 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 2). Latest articles →

Re: port-freebsd digest, Vol 1 #86 - 2 msgs
Fri, 7 May 2004 15:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Jaime Fournier <[email protected]> • #73
Re: Re: port-freebsd digest, Vol 1 #85 - 1 msg
Wed, 05 May 2004 06:55:07 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #72
Re: port-freebsd digest, Vol 1 #85 - 1 msg
Wed, 5 May 2004 00:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Jaime Fournier <[email protected]> • #71
Re: Problems on 5.2-R
Fri, 16 Apr 2004 11:24:21 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #70
Re: Problems on 5.2-R
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:26:52 -0700
"Nathan A. Cosgray" <[email protected]> • #69
Re: Problems on 5.2-R
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:28:10 -0500
Alec Kloss <[email protected]> • #68
Re: Problems on 5.2-R
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 17:43:27 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #67
Re: Problems on 5.2-R
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:11:18 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #66
Problems on 5.2-R
Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:21:50 -0700
"Nathan A. Cosgray" <[email protected]> • #65
5.2.1-R partial success
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:26:35 +0100 (MET)
Adriaan de Groot <[email protected]> • #64
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 20:07:38 +0100 (MET)
Adriaan de Groot <[email protected]> • #63
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:22:54 -0800
Carmi Weinzweig <[email protected]> • #62
Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 07:28:42 -0800
Carmi Weinzweig <[email protected]> • #61
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Mon, 08 Mar 2004 12:45:56 -0500
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #60
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:35:37 -0800
Carmi Weinzweig <[email protected]> • #59
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:53:11 -0800 (PST)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #58
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:02:47 -0500
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #57
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 07 Mar 2004 19:59:32 -0500
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #56
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 07 Mar 2004 19:54:33 -0500
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #55
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 21:59:50 +0100 (MET)
Adriaan de Groot <[email protected]> • #54
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 14:11:34 -0600
Alec Kloss <[email protected]> • #53
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 09:20:25 -0800 (PST)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #52
Re: Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 07 Mar 2004 11:15:13 -0500
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #51
Is this still an ongoing project?
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 07:58:00 -0800
Carmi Weinzweig <[email protected]> • #50
Re: Hi dudes, would you care to point me in the right direction?
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:59:48 -0500
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #49
Re: Hi dudes, would you care to point me in the right direction?
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:59:05 -0500
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #48
Hi dudes, would you care to point me in the right direction?
Fri, 21 Nov 2003 23:21:51 +0100
Joakim Arfvidsson <[email protected]> • #47
Re: Making more progress....
Thu, 9 Oct 2003 19:14:20 -0400
Kenny Freeman <[email protected]> • #46
Re: Making more progress....
Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:13:36 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #45
Making more progress....
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 01:40:52 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #44
Re: OpenAFS + FreeBSD 5.1 RELEASE + MAC + Jail
Tue, 07 Oct 2003 08:28:22 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #43
OpenAFS + FreeBSD 5.1 RELEASE + MAC + Jail
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 23:05:05 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #42
OpenAFS + FreeBSD 5.1 RELEASE + MAC + Jail
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 22:34:34 -0400
Kenny Freeman <[email protected]>(by way of Kenny Freeman <[email protected]>) • #41
It starts and it stops!
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #40
Re: no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:20:37 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #39
Re: Are Full FreeBSD sources needed?
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:57:59 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #38
Are Full FreeBSD sources needed?
Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:29:32 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #37
Are Full FreeBSD sources needed?
Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #36
Re: no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:49:54 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #35
Re: no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:37:17 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #34
Re: no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #33
Re: no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:36:28 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #32
Re: no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #31
Re: no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Fri, 26 Sep 2003 18:23:50 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #30
Re: no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:31:51 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #29
Re: no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #28
no rule to make target param.i386_fsbd_50.h
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #27
Re: Re: FreeBSD 5-current client work....
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 16:24:17 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #26
Re: Re: FreeBSD 5-current client work....
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:59:39 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #25
Re: Re: FreeBSD 5-current client work....
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:54:26 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #24
Re: Re: FreeBSD 5-current client work....
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:42:58 -0400
Chaskiel M Grundman <[email protected]> • #23
Re: FreeBSD 5-current client work....
Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:39:20 -0400 (EDT)
Garrett Wollman <[email protected]> • #22
Re: Clean Build on -STABLE with 8-13 SNAP
Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:07:09 -0500
Alec Kloss <[email protected]> • #21
Re: Clean Build on -STABLE with 8-13 SNAP
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #20
Re: Clean Build on -STABLE with 8-13 SNAP
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:24:52 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #19
Clean Build on -STABLE with 8-13 SNAP
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #18
ptserver again
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:45:08 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #17
SUPERGROUPS
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:29:26 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #16
Re: Build Fails in ptserver
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:58:05 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #15
Build Fails in ptserver
Sat, 9 Aug 2003 14:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
"Jason C. Wells" <[email protected]> • #14
Re: Where can I get the FreeBSD Port
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:53:07 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #13
Re: Where can I get the FreeBSD Port
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:52:37 -0400
Garance A Drosihn <[email protected]> • #12
Where can I get the FreeBSD Port
Sat, 19 Jul 2003 20:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
Jason Wells <[email protected]> • #11
FreeBSD 5.0 kernel module
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:35:42 -0400
Jim Rees <[email protected]> • #10
Re: Kernel panic on fs mkmount
16 May 2003 19:42:07 -0400
"David E. Cross" <[email protected]> • #9
Re: Kernel panic on fs mkmount
Fri, 16 May 2003 18:40:32 -0400
Chaskiel M Grundman <[email protected]> • #8
Re: Kernel panic on fs mkmount
16 May 2003 18:35:42 -0400
"David E. Cross" <[email protected]> • #7
Re: Kernel panic on fs mkmount
Fri, 16 May 2003 18:12:09 -0400
Chaskiel M Grundman <[email protected]> • #6
Re: Kernel panic on fs mkmount
16 May 2003 14:27:53 -0400
"David E. Cross" <[email protected]> • #5
Kernel panic on fs mkmount
Fri, 16 May 2003 16:44:10 +0100
Richard Jones <[email protected]> • #4
grammar.y and Bison
Thu, 8 May 2003 16:19:32 +0100
Richard Jones <[email protected]> • #3
Re: grammar.y and Bison
Fri, 9 May 2003 12:42:36 +0100
Richard Jones <[email protected]> • #2
[OpenAFS-port-freebsd] grammar.y and Bison
Thu, 8 May 2003 16:22:34 +0100
Richard Jones <[email protected]> • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.