gmane.comp.java.audit.checkstyle.user archive

409 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →

any module to check method modifier
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:04:55 +0530
Nitin Bhardwaj <[email protected]> • #1181
Re: Some Issues w/ a green install of Checkstyle 5.0 beta
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:49:03 -0400
Tim Visher <[email protected]> • #1180
Re: Some Issues w/ a green install of Checkstyle 5.0 beta
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:48:32 -0400
Tim Visher <[email protected]> • #1179
Re: Some Issues w/ a green install of Checkstyle 5.0 beta
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:48:22 +1000
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1178
Some Issues w/ a green install of Checkstyle 5.0 beta
Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:07:43 -0400
Tim Visher <[email protected]> • #1177
Re: checkstyle accpting other resources than just fileset
Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:52:19 +1100
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1176
Eclipse Checkstyle Plugin 5.0.0beta2 just snuck out the door
Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:14:26 +0100
Lars Ködderitzsch <[email protected]> • #1175
checkstyle accpting other resources than just fileset
Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:55:59 -0400
"Dever, Jeffrey" <[email protected]> • #1174
Announcing Checkstyle release 5.0 beta 2
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:51:18 +1100
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1173
Re: How to get the type of the variable?
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:24:57 +0100
Lars Kühne <[email protected]> • #1172
Re: How to get the type of the variable?
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:31:33 +0100
Lars Kühne <[email protected]> • #1171
How to get the type of the variable?
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
S G <[email protected]> • #1170
Re: Problem Running Checkstyle-5.0-beta2
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:57:02 -0500
Tim Visher <[email protected]> • #1169
Re: Problem Running Checkstyle-5.0-beta2
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:26:56 -0800
Thomas Suckow <[email protected]> • #1168
Re: Problem Running Checkstyle-5.0-beta2
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:20:41 +1100
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1167
Re: Problem Running Checkstyle-5.0-beta2
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:19:40 -0500
Tim Visher <[email protected]> • #1166
Re: Problem Running Checkstyle-5.0-beta2
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:59:48 +1100
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1165
Problem Running Checkstyle-5.0-beta2
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:50:24 -0500
Tim Visher <[email protected]> • #1164
Re: org\apache\tools\ant\antlib.xml not found
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 12:52:43 -0800 (PST)
S G <[email protected]> • #1163
Re: org\apache\tools\ant\antlib.xml not found
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:21:24 +0100
"Remo Liechti" <[email protected]> • #1162
checkStyle an error
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:20:02 +0800
R04技术支持部高级程序员 赵军海 <[email protected]> • #1161
Re: org\apache\tools\ant\antlib.xml not found
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:02:03 +1000
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1160
Re: org\apache\tools\ant\antlib.xml not found
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:56:52 -0800 (PST)
S G <[email protected]> • #1159
Re: org\apache\tools\ant\antlib.xml not found
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 08:53:46 +1000
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1158
Re: org\apache\tools\ant\antlib.xml not found
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:42:34 -0800 (PST)
S G <[email protected]> • #1157
Re: org\apache\tools\ant\antlib.xml not found
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:39:44 -0800 (PST)
S G <[email protected]> • #1156
Re: org\apache\tools\ant\antlib.xml not found
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:48:31 +1000
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1155
org\apache\tools\ant\antlib.xml not found
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:31:19 -0800 (PST)
S G <[email protected]> • #1154
Re: Empty line check
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:56:59 +0100
Lars Kühne <[email protected]> • #1153
Re: Empty line check
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:32:53 -0800 (PST)
mgryszko <[email protected]> • #1152
Re: Empty line check
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:16:05 +0100
Lars Kühne <[email protected]> • #1151
Empty line check
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:57:46 -0800 (PST)
mgryszko <[email protected]> • #1150
Re: [Checkstyle-commits] Help in Writing Checks
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:28:02 +0100
Lars Kühne <[email protected]> • #1149
Re: JSP Checking
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:24:40 +0000
"emerson cargnin" <[email protected]> • #1148
Re: JSP Checking
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 21:35:59 +1100
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1147
Re: JSP Checking
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:08:03 +0000
"emerson cargnin" <[email protected]> • #1146
Re: JSP Checking
Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:52:32 +1100
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1145
JSP Checking
Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:28:40 +0000
"emerson cargnin" <[email protected]> • #1144
Properties file name collision?
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:52:29 -0800 (PST)
drwho <[email protected]> • #1143
the xsl code
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:53:06 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #1142
checkstyle output
Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:34:51 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #1141
Re: Is the Checkstyle project inter ested in a Log4J Best Practice checker?
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:57:54 +0100
Klaus-Peter Berg <[email protected]> • #1140
Re: TR: Is the project interested in the following rules ?
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:51:34 +1100
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1139
Re: Checkstyle + Ant - display only errors
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:58:46 +1100
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1138
Re: Is the Checkstyle project interested in a Log4J Best Practice checker?
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:21:06 +1100
Oliver Burn <[email protected]> • #1137
Re: Is the Checkstyle project interested in a Log4J Best Practice checker?
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Klaus-Peter Berg <[email protected]> • #1136
Re: Is the Checkstyle project interested in a Log4J Best Practice checker?
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:28:25 -0600
"Jeff Jensen" <[email protected]> • #1135
Re: Is the Checkstyle project interested in a Log4J Best Practice checker?
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 06:48:04 -0800 (PST)
Klaus-Peter Berg <[email protected]> • #1134
Re: Checkstyle + Ant - display only errors
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:21:56 +0100
Klaus-Peter Berg <[email protected]> • #1133
Re: checkstyle-frame.xsl
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:08:33 +0100
Klaus-Peter Berg <[email protected]> • #1132
checkstyle-frame.xsl
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:42:00 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #1131
Checkstyle + Ant - display only errors
Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:21:58 +0100
[email protected] • #1130
Re: Is the Checkstyle project interested in a Log4J Best Practice checker?
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:36:03 -0600
"Jeff Jensen" <[email protected]> • #1129
Is the Checkstyle project inter ested in a Log4J Best Practice checker?
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:21:59 +0100
Klaus-Peter Berg <[email protected]> • #1128
Re: [Checkstyle-commits] Help in Writing Checks
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:39:34 +0100
"Lars Kühne" <[email protected]> • #1127
Re: suppression filter regex
Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:02:08 +1100
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1126
Re: suppression dtd missing id attribute
Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:13:49 -0500
"Ben Dean" <[email protected]> • #1125
Re: suppression dtd missing id attribute
Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:28:33 -0500
"Ben Dean" <[email protected]> • #1124
suppression dtd missing id attribute
Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:15:02 -0500
"Ben Dean" <[email protected]> • #1123
Re: suppression filter regex
Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:17:59 -0500
"Ben Dean" <[email protected]> • #1122
Re: suppression filter regex
Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:50:31 +1100
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1121
suppression filter regex
Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:06:47 -0500
"Ben Dean" <[email protected]> • #1120
Re: CrossLanguageRegexpHeader only working forjava
Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:19:42 +1100
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1119
Re: CrossLanguageRegexpHeader only working forjava
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:12:34 -0500
"Tim Foster" <[email protected]> • #1118
Re: CrossLanguageRegexpHeader only working for java
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:02:44 +1100
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1117
CrossLanguageRegexpHeader only working for java
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:11:58 -0500
"Tim Foster" <[email protected]> • #1116
Re: Can't read Checkstyle configuration
Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:39:57 +0100
"Lewis, Eric" <[email protected]> • #1115
Re: Can't read Checkstyle configuration
Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:28:44 +0100
"Lars Kühne" <[email protected]> • #1114
Can't read Checkstyle configuration
Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:15:53 +0100
"Lewis, Eric" <[email protected]> • #1113
Re: define a search pattern in pom.xml
Sun, 2 Nov 2008 22:33:08 +1100
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1112
define a search pattern in pom.xml
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:35:00 +0100 (CET)
"Michael Siebert" <[email protected]> • #1111
location of suppressions filter file
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:09:22 +0100
Gary McWilliams <[email protected]> • #1110
TR: Is the project interested in the following rules ?
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:11:31 +0200
"Pawlak Michel (DCTI)" <[email protected]> • #1109
Re: [5.0beta01] Unable to instantiate PackageHtml
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:04:32 +1100
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1108
Re: [5.0beta01] Unable to instantiate PackageHtml
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:40:57 -0700
"Thomas Suckow" <[email protected]> • #1107
Re: Extending checkstyle 4.4
Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:04:34 +0200
"Lars Kühne" <[email protected]> • #1106
Extending checkstyle 4.4
Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:00:16 +0200 (CEST)
Arnaud Roques <[email protected]> • #1105
Re: Extending checkstyle to detect objetc comparison with == operator.
Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:42:10 +1000
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1104
[5.0beta01] Unable to instantiate PackageHtml
Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
stlecho <[email protected]> • #1103
RE : Extending checkstyle to detect objetc comparison with == operator.
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:13:43 +0200 (CEST)
Arnaud Roques <[email protected]> • #1102
RE : Extending checkstyle to detect objetc comparison with == operator.
Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:58:42 +0200 (CEST)
Arnaud Roques <[email protected]> • #1101
Extending checkstyle to detect objetc comparison with == operator.
Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:14:40 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #1100
Re: RE : Checking a method call
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:57:31 +1000
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1099
Re: RE : Checking a method call
Tue, 16 Sep 2008 16:56:55 +0200
"Lars Kühne" <[email protected]> • #1098
Re: RE : Checking a method call
Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:48:45 +1000
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1097
Re: Avoid javadoc warning on constructors of Exception subclasses
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:03:38 +0200
"Wim Deblauwe" <[email protected]> • #1096
Re: logger variable casing?
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:00:11 +0200
"Wim Deblauwe" <[email protected]> • #1095
Re: logger variable casing?
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:55:12 -0400
"Armstrong, Conrad" <[email protected]> • #1094
Re: Avoid javadoc warning on constructors of Exception subclasses
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:26:10 +1000
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1093
Re: Avoid javadoc warning on constructors of Exception subclasses
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:22:22 +0200
"Wim Deblauwe" <[email protected]> • #1092
Re: Avoid javadoc warning on constructors of Exception subclasses
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:15:10 +1000
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1091
Avoid javadoc warning on constructors of Exception subclasses
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:04:57 +0200
"Wim Deblauwe" <[email protected]> • #1090
Re: logger variable casing?
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:43:01 +1000
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1089
logger variable casing?
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Wim Deblauwe <[email protected]> • #1088
RE : Checking a method call
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:45:39 +0200
"Arnaud Roques" <[email protected]> • #1087
Checking a method call
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:06:02 +0200 (CEST)
"jp.vandara" <[email protected]> • #1086
Re: ANT - Checkstyle with custom check
Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:26:16 +1000
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1085
Re: ANT - Checkstyle with custom check
Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:24:39 -0700
"Thomas Suckow" <[email protected]> • #1084
Re: ANT - Checkstyle with custom check
Fri, 5 Sep 2008 13:02:11 +1000
"Oliver Burn" <[email protected]> • #1083
Re: ANT - Checkstyle with custom check
Thu, 4 Sep 2008 19:56:37 -0700
"Thomas Suckow" <[email protected]> • #1082
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.