gmane.comp.misc.free-software-business archive

362 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Software as a public service
Thu, 12 May 2005 17:32:54 -0400
Russell McOrmond <[email protected]> • #2057
Re: Down with the GPL!
Thu, 12 May 2005 14:59:08 -0600
Lajos Moczar <[email protected]> • #2056
Down with the GPL!
Thu, 12 May 2005 13:46:39 -0700
DV Henkel-Wallace <[email protected]> • #2055
Computer Survey on perceived advantages of Open Source
Thu, 12 May 2005 21:46:07 +0200
Laurent GUERBY <[email protected]> • #2054
Re: Software as a public service
Thu, 12 May 2005 11:34:13 -0500
Joe Corneli <[email protected]> • #2053
Re: Software as a public service
Thu, 12 May 2005 17:12:12 +0200
Bernard Lang <[email protected]> • #2052
Re: Software as a public service
Thu, 12 May 2005 08:10:55 -0700
Alan Hudson <[email protected]> • #2051
Re: Open Source -> Closed Source
Thu, 12 May 2005 14:13:51 +0200
Santiago Gala <[email protected]> • #2050
Re: Software as a public service
Thu, 12 May 2005 14:04:33 +0200
Santiago Gala <[email protected]> • #2049
Re: Software as a public service
Thu, 12 May 2005 16:20:49 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #2048
Re: Software as a public service
Thu, 12 May 2005 00:18:29 -0400
Frank Hecker <[email protected]> • #2047
Re: Software as a public service
Wed, 11 May 2005 23:37:15 -0400
Frank Hecker <[email protected]> • #2046
Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?]
Tue, 10 May 2005 00:58:43 +0200
Laurent GUERBY <[email protected]> • #2027
Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?]
Mon, 09 May 2005 16:21:14 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #2026
Can Open Src Projects be Acquired?
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:34:52 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #2022
Re: a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:46:40 +0200
Laurent GUERBY <[email protected]> • #2020
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:55:31 -0400
Russell Nelson <[email protected]> • #2019
RE: Standing on multi-authored works
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:16:46 -0700
"Lawrence Rosen" <[email protected]> • #2018
Re: Standing on multi-authored works
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 12:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> • #2017
Re: Standing on multi-authored works
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:55:22 -0700
Ben Tilly <[email protected]> • #2016
Re: Standing on multi-authored works
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
cody koeninger <[email protected]> • #2015
RE: Standing on multi-authored works
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
cody koeninger <[email protected]> • #2014
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:15:15 -0700
David Ascher <[email protected]> • #2013
Re: Standing on multi-authored works
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:06:59 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #2012
Re: Standing on multi-authored works
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:14:29 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #2011
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 13:30:02 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #2010
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:34:00 -0400
Adam Turoff <[email protected]> • #1995
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 03:30:16 +0200
"A. Pagaltzis" <[email protected]> • #1994
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:58:34 -0500
Joe Corneli <[email protected]> • #1993
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Tom Lord <[email protected]> • #1992
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:08:09 -0500
Joe Corneli <[email protected]> • #1991
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Tom Lord <[email protected]> • #1990
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Tom Lord <[email protected]> • #1989
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Tom Lord <[email protected]> • #1988
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Tom Lord <[email protected]> • #1987
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:00:50 +0100
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1986
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:38:55 +0200
Laurent GUERBY <[email protected]> • #1985
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:36:47 -0400
Adam Turoff <[email protected]> • #1984
Re: Standing on multi-authored works
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
cody koeninger <[email protected]> • #1983
German Software Businesses Opinions on Software Patents
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:34:19 +0200
Laurent GUERBY <[email protected]> • #1982
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:48:15 +0100
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1981
Re: (c) permission on multi-authored works [was: Charging the Charger]
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:19:52 -0500
Joe Corneli <[email protected]> • #1980
Re: a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
Tom Lord <[email protected]> • #1979
Re: a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Tom Lord <[email protected]> • #1978
Re: (c) permission on multi-authored works [was: Charging the Charger]
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:28:41 -0700
DV Henkel-Wallace <[email protected]> • #1977
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:21:47 -0400
Adam Turoff <[email protected]> • #1976
Re: Standing on multi-authored works
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:20:27 -0700
DV Henkel-Wallace <[email protected]> • #1975
Re: (c) permission on multi-authored works [was: Charging the Charger]
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:17:03 -0500
Joe Corneli <[email protected]> • #1974
Re: Standing on multi-authored works
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:14:49 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #1973
Standing on multi-authored works
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:07:55 -0700
DV Henkel-Wallace <[email protected]> • #1972
(c) permission on multi-authored works [was: Charging the Charger]
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:39:42 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #1971
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:42:29 -0400
Frank Hecker <[email protected]> • #1970
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:30:24 +0100
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1969
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:10:10 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #1968
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:21:04 +0200
"Sergio Montoro Ten" <[email protected]> • #1967
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 03:57:09 +0100
Ben Laurie <[email protected]> • #1966
Re: Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Sun, 17 Apr 2005 22:46:44 -0400
Robin Millette <[email protected]> • #1965
Bounty for Bugs in Open Source Projects?
Sun, 17 Apr 2005 19:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
Nik Cubrilovic <[email protected]> • #1964
Re: a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:47:31 -0400 (EDT)
"Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <[email protected]> • #1963
Re: a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:36:28 -0400
Robin 'Roblimo' Miller <[email protected]> • #1962
Re: a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:19:09 -0400
Chip Mefford <[email protected]> • #1961
Re: a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:30:31 -0700
DV Henkel-Wallace <[email protected]> • #1960
Re: a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:21:53 -0400
"Forrest J. Cavalier III" <[email protected]> • #1959
a bit OT- Fully Open Standards for Citizen-Government
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:13:06 -0400
Chip Mefford <[email protected]> • #1958
Re: Charging the Charger
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:44:35 -0500
Taran Rampersad <[email protected]> • #1957
Re: Charging the Charger
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:32:54 -0500
Taran Rampersad <[email protected]> • #1956
Free Software Magazine
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:27:41 +0800
Tony Mobily IMAP <[email protected]> • #1955
Re: Charging the Charger
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 16:04:48 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #1954
Re: Charging the Charger
14 Apr 2005 08:20:51 +0200
[email protected] (David N. Welton) • #1953
Re: Charging the Charger
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:55:59 -0500
Taran Rampersad <[email protected]> • #1952
Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?]
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:31:35 -0500
Taran Rampersad <[email protected]> • #1939
Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?]
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:59:50 -0500
Joe Corneli <[email protected]> • #1938
Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?]
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:01:37 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #1937
Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?]
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:54:28 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #1936
Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?]
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:16:56 -0500
Taran Rampersad <[email protected]> • #1935
Re: Fwd: Introducing flexible copyright licensing
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:43:08 +0200
Stéphane Croisier <[email protected]> • #1934
Re: Charging the Charger
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:50:15 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #1933
Fwd: Introducing flexible copyright licensing
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:38:19 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #1932
Re: Charging the Charger
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:34:55 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #1931
Re: Charging the Charger [was: GPL v3 public performance idea?]
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:22:05 -0400
"Marshall W. Van Alstyne" <[email protected]> • #1930
Re: GPL v3 article - is this the public performance idea?
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 20:31:59 -0700
"Karsten M. Self" <[email protected]> • #1903
Re: GPL v3 article - is this the public performance idea?
Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:53:23 -0400
Robin Millette <[email protected]> • #1902
Re: An Open Source version of Hailstorm and Passport
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:58:35 -0500
Ben Tilly <[email protected]> • #1898
Re: An Open Source version of Hailstorm and Passport
Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:14:28 +0100
Ralph Corderoy <[email protected]> • #1897
Introduction from CP
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:51:37 -0800
"Chris Preimesberger" <[email protected]> • #1892
Re: Finishing work
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:08:32 -0500
"La Monte H.P. Yarroll" <[email protected]> • #1886
Re: Software as a public service
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:40:47 -0800
DV Henkel-Wallace <[email protected]> • #1883
Re: Software as a public service
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:57:29 -0800
DV Henkel-Wallace <[email protected]> • #1882
Re: EU Patent Law
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:15:33 +0100
Norbert Bollow <[email protected]> • #1881
Re: Software as a public service
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:57:29 +0100
Bernard Lang <[email protected]> • #1880
Re: Software as a public service
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:14:48 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #1879
Re: Software as a public service
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:33:23 +0100
Laurent GUERBY <[email protected]> • #1878
[OS:N:] WFS 2005 - Call for Papers
01 Feb 2005 03:07:04 -0200
Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]> • #1636
Re: Tim's paradigm shift
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:22:22 -0700
Ben Tilly <[email protected]> • #1341
RE: ARM: The Non-Evil Monopolist
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 13:56:47 -0700
"Lawrence Rosen" <[email protected]> • #1340
Re: Tim's paradigm shift
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 21:54:20 +0100
Jamie Lokier <[email protected]> • #1339
Re: ARM: The Non-Evil Monopolist
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:46:44 -0700
Ben Tilly <[email protected]> • #1338
Fwd: ARM: The Non-Evil Monopolist
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:22:58 -0700
Tim O'Reilly <[email protected]> • #1337
Re: Tim's paradigm shift
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 10:21:21 -0700
Tim O'Reilly <[email protected]> • #1336
Re: Tim's paradigm shift
Sat, 10 Jul 2004 15:38:41 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> • #1335
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.