gmane.comp.tex.tetex.beta archive

386 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: 2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:26:15 +0100
Reinhard Kotucha <[email protected]> • #733
2.99.11: yet another release candidate
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:28:26 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #732
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:10:07 +0100
David Kastrup <[email protected]> • #731
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:36:20 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #730
Re: texshow and kpsewhich
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:31:34 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #729
Re: texshow and kpsewhich
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:20:09 +0100 (CET)
Peter Münster <[email protected]> • #728
texshow and kpsewhich
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:42:02 +0100
Peter Münster <[email protected]> • #727
Re: texshow and kpsewhich
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:52:58 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #726
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:19:41 +0100
Martin Schröder <[email protected]> • #725
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:03:19 -0700
Derek Price <[email protected]> • #724
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:33:32 +0100
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> • #723
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:41:32 +1300
Volker Kuhlmann <[email protected]> • #722
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:21:40 +0100
Harald Koenig <[email protected]> • #721
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:11:49 +0100
Stefan Ulrich <[email protected]> • #720
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:35:23 +0100
Jindrich Novy <[email protected]> • #719
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:01:09 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #718
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:23:22 +1300
Volker Kuhlmann <[email protected]> • #717
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:09:30 -0800
Mike Castle <[email protected]> • #716
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:27:06 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #715
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:26:37 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #714
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:50:12 +0100
"Steffen R. Knollmann" <[email protected]> • #713
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:05:30 +0100
Jindrich Novy <[email protected]> • #712
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:41:51 +0000
Robin Fairbairns <[email protected]> • #711
dvipdfm (was: 2.99.10: another release candidate)
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:11:01 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #710
Bug#291438: tetex-bin: dvipdfm segfaults when used with hyperref and hypertex
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:28:54 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #709
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:50:51 +0100
Harald Koenig <[email protected]> • #708
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 00:30:06 -0800
Mike Castle <[email protected]> • #707
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:23:15 +0100
Artemio Gonzalez Lopez <[email protected]> • #706
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:02:12 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #705
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:56:25 +0100
Artemio Gonzalez Lopez <[email protected]> • #704
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:09:06 +0100
Willi Burmeister <[email protected]> • #703
Re: 2.99.10: another release candidate
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:50:17 +0100
David Kastrup <[email protected]> • #702
2.99.10: another release candidate
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:31:39 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #701
Re: RSS feed for mailing lists
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:32:39 +1300
Richard MAHONEY <[email protected]> • #700
RSS feed for mailing lists
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:08:01 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #699
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:48:34 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #698
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:59:43 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #697
make distclean misses some stuff
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:13:42 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #696
Re: teTeX-3.0 release candidate in experimental (including libkpathsea4), please test
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 15:44:38 +0100
Frank Küster <[email protected]> • #695
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:48:59 +0100
Christian Ebert <[email protected]> • #694
"texconfig hyphen" in 2.99.9
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:53:14 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #693
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:48:12 +0100
Benedikt Birkenbach <[email protected]> • #692
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:02:30 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #691
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:42:43 +0100
Jan-Ake Larsson <[email protected]> • #690
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 07:04:11 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #689
2.99.9 xdvi with xaw on sun
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:43:18 +0100 (MET)
Sven de Vries <[email protected]> • #688
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:57:06 +0100 (CET)
Helmut Jarausch <[email protected]> • #687
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:46:59 -0500 (EST)
ezra peisach <[email protected]> • #686
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:41:39 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #685
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:28:57 +0100
Willi Burmeister <[email protected]> • #684
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:42:00 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #683
Re: 2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:50:23 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #682
2.99.9: 3rd (and last?) release candidate
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:55:23 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #681
Re: 2.99.8: updmap output directories
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:10:48 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #680
Re: 2.99.8: updmap output directories
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:13:31 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #679
Re: 2.99.8: updmap output directories
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:51:06 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #678
Re: 2.99.8: updmap output directories
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:05:51 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #677
Re: 2.99.8: updmap output directories
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:25:05 +0100
[email protected] (Frank Küster) • #676
teTeX-3.0 release candidate in experimental (including libkpathsea4), please test
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:38:40 +0100
Frank Küster <[email protected]> • #675
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:00:13 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #674
Re: Fontmap entries for Micropress fonts
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:58:31 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #673
Fontmap entries for Micropress fonts
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 22:44:26 +0100
Lars Engebretsen <[email protected]> • #672
Re: 2.99.8: unable to build aleph
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:57:58 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #671
2.99.8: updmap output directories
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:45:34 +0100
Lars Engebretsen <[email protected]> • #670
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 19:06:59 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #669
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:05:16 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #668
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:28:49 +0900
Akira Kakuto <[email protected]> • #667
Re: 2.99.8: unable to build aleph
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 17:23:49 +0900
Kenta MURATA <[email protected]> • #666
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:55:05 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #665
2.99.8: unable to build aleph
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 14:24:44 +0900
Kenta MURATA <[email protected]> • #664
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 19:37:30 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #663
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:29:02 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #662
Re: 2.99.8: solaris 8 configure fails, "missing tangle for cross-compilation"
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:20:49 +0100
Anders Lennartsson <[email protected]> • #661
Re: 2.99.8: updmap
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:43:34 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #660
Re: 2.99.8: updmap
Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:55:48 +0900
Nobuyuki Tsuchimura <[email protected]> • #659
Re: 2.99.8: updmap
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:26:02 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #658
2.99.8: updmap
Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:59:40 +0900
Nobuyuki Tsuchimura <[email protected]> • #657
Re: 2.99.8: second release candidate
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:52:05 +0100
Martin Schröder <[email protected]> • #656
Re: 2.99.8: second release candidate
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:51:27 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #655
Re: 2.99.8: second release candidate
Thu, 06 Jan 2005 10:48:58 +0100
Benedikt Birkenbach <[email protected]> • #654
Re: 2.99.8: second release candidate
Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:59:30 +0000
Robin Fairbairns <[email protected]> • #653
Re: 2.99.8: second release candidate
Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:07:45 +0100
Svend Tollak Munkejord <[email protected]> • #652
Re: 2.99.8: second release candidate
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 18:51:35 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #651
Re: 2.99.8: second release candidate
Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:29:19 +0100
Svend Tollak Munkejord <[email protected]> • #650
Re: 2.99.5 release
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:13:48 +0100
Martin Schröder <[email protected]> • #649
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Mon, 03 Jan 2005 15:53:05 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #648
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 13:37:32 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #647
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:27:32 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #646
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Mon, 03 Jan 2005 20:50:51 +0900
Akira Kakuto <[email protected]> • #645
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:06:24 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #644
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:32:40 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #643
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Mon, 03 Jan 2005 11:37:22 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #642
Re: 2.99.8: solaris 8 configure fails, "missing tangle for cross-compilation"
Sun, 2 Jan 2005 11:51:03 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #641
2.99.8: solaris 8 configure fails, "missing tangle for cross-compilation"
Sun, 2 Jan 2005 08:35:14 +0100
Anders Lennartsson <[email protected]> • #640
2.99.8: second release candidate
Sat, 1 Jan 2005 12:31:48 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #639
2.99.7 - problems with ftmutil and texlinks
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:30:21 +0100
Willi Burmeister <[email protected]> • #638
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:57:22 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #637
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:36:21 +0300
Vladimir Volovich <[email protected]> • #636
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:50:26 +0100
Thomas Esser <[email protected]> • #635
Re: 2.99.7: first rc of teTeX-3.0
Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:51:50 +0100
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[email protected]> • #634
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.