gmane.ietf.rfc822 archive
1437 archived articles, newest first (page 9 of 15). Latest articles →
Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:18:30 -0500 (New York)Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:55:09 -0800Re: quoted-pair in dcontent / Space after colon
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:48:40 GMTRe: quoted-pair in dcontent / Space after colon
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:08:27 +0100Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:42:32 -0800Re: quoted-pair in dcontent / Space after colon
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:55:34 +0100Re: quoted-pair in dcontent / Space after colon (Was: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL)
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:07:10 GMTRe: Please comment on draft-duerst-mailto-bis-04.txt
Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:57:09 +0100Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:28:20 -0600Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:22:49 -0800Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:37:15 +0000Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:23:29 -0600Re: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:54:25 +0000Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:54:24 +0000Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:27:46 -0600Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:25:36 +0100Re: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:59:47 +0100Re: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:10:58 +0100quoted-pair in dcontent / Space after colon (Was: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL)
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:32:54 -0600Re: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:13:39 -0800Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:33:09 -0800 (PST)Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:22:06 GMTRe: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:48:36 GMTRe: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:09:26 -0600Re: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:09:44 +0100Re: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:37:18 -0800 (PST)Re: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:52:13 -0600Re: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:32:56 -0600Re: New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:37:23 GMTRe: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:26:45 +0100Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:29:31 GMTRe: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:23:35 -0800Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:21:33 -0800Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:44:27 +0100Re: rfc2822bis: "originator of the message" and "transmitter" not defined
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:53:55 -0600rfc2822bis: "originator of the message" and "transmitter" not defined
Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:28:51 +0100Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:33:44 -0600New 2822upd-04 - obs-NO-WS-CTL
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:12:35 -0600Re: rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:00:42 -0800 (PST)I-D Action:draft-resnick-2822upd-04.txt
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:30:01 -0500rfc2822bis -- adding clarifying Sender: text
Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:18:29 -0800Please comment on draft-duerst-mailto-bis-04.txt
Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:47:26 +0900Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Thu, 6 Dec 2007 15:17:18 +0000Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:29:31 -0500Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:14:38 -0500Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:14:24 -0800Re: [ietf-dkim] Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:55:28 -0800Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:53:20 +0000Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:38:38 +0000Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:44:12 +0000Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:14:37 -0800Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:10:04 -0800Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs.Validity)
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 02:35:04 +0100Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:16:29 -0500Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:27:55 -0800 (PST)Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 00:49:55 +0100Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:52:16 -0800Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis
Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:45:38 -0800Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis
Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:10:27 -0800Re: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis
Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:59:07 GMTRe: Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:29:47 -0500Handling of NO-WS-CTL in 2822bis
Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:51:11 -0800 (PST)Re: Unquoted "@" in From still in the wild?
Mon, 3 Dec 2007 13:32:37 +0000Re: Unquoted "@" in From still in the wild?
Sun, 02 Dec 2007 07:44:27 -0800 (PST)Unquoted "@" in From still in the wild?
Sun, 2 Dec 2007 20:58:39 +1100Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender
Sat, 1 Dec 2007 18:51:26 +0100Re: Mailing lists as 2822-Sender
Sat, 01 Dec 2007 08:56:51 -0500Mailing lists as 2822-Sender (was: Responsibility vs. Validity)
Sat, 1 Dec 2007 13:07:50 +01002821bis, 2822upd, email-arch
Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:21:11 +0100Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:55:49 GMTRe: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:29:14 -0500Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:32:41 +0100Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:29:24 GMTRe: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:14:08 +0100Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:47:18 +0100Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:48:19 -0600Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:36:30 -0800 (PST)Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:28:47 -0500Re: Authentication-Results: header draft
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 07:58:59 +0100Re: Authentication-Results: header draft
Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:50:57 -0800Re: Authentication-Results: header draft
Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:52:30 +0100Re: Authentication-Results: header draft
Fri, 9 Nov 2007 03:48:08 +0100Authentication-Results: header draft
Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:32:30 -0800 (PST)Re: New Disposition type: Inline Subordinate
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:48:09 -0800Re: Non destructive folding/unfolding (ie, no insertion of whitespace in unfolding)
Mon, 5 Nov 2007 05:20:03 -0600Re: New Disposition type: Inline Subordinate
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:40:30 -0500Re: New Disposition type: Inline Subordinate
Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:22:25 +0100Re: New Disposition type: Inline Subordinate
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:26:29 -0800 (PST)New Disposition type: Inline Subordinate
Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:09:39 +0800Re: Non destructive folding/unfolding (ie, no insertion of whitespace in unfolding)
Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:03:32 +0100Re: Non destructive folding/unfolding (ie, no insertion ofwhitespace in unfolding)
Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:48:15 +0000Re: Non destructive folding/unfolding (ie, no insertion of whitespace in unfolding)
Thu, 1 Nov 2007 00:24:26 -0700Non destructive folding/unfolding (ie, no insertion of whitespace in unfolding)
Thu, 1 Nov 2007 12:35:39 +1100Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:00:37 GMTRe: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis? (#1507)
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:01:47 +0200Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:13:04 +0200Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:55:02 -0400Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:38:04 -0400Re: Missing ABNF terms in 2821bis?
Wed, 17 Oct 2007 09:46:35 -0700Mailing List Last Call now open for draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-05.txt
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:34:28 -0400
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.