gmane.ietf.sigtran archive

3511 archived articles, newest first (page 17 of 36). Latest articles →

How to share Routing info. in IPSPs communication at M3UA level
Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:41:45 -0800
[email protected] • #8510
New Internet-Drafts
Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:20:20 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8509
Re: Query regarding multiple SCTP associations between ASP & SGP
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 02:45:24 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8508
Re: Query regarding multiple SCTP associations between ASP & SGP
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 23:33:32 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8507
Re: Is it possible to make all the associations ACTIVE at a time at M3UA level ?
Wed, 7 Feb 2007 09:35:37 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #8506
Re: Is it possible to make all the associations ACTIVE at a time at M3UA level ?
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:19:32 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8505
Re: Is it possible to make all the associations ACTIVE at a time at M3UA level ?
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 06:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Dario <[email protected]> • #8504
Re: Is it possible to make all the associations ACTIVE at a time at M3UA level ?
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 07:07:10 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8503
Re: Is it possible to make all the associations ACTIVE at a time at M3UA level ?
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 05:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Dario Filjar <[email protected]> • #8502
Re: Is it possible to make all the associations ACTIVE at a time at M3UA level ?
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 02:13:37 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8501
Is it possible to make all the associations ACTIVE at a time at M3UA level ?
Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:19:26 +0530
Mahantesh <[email protected]> • #8500
Re: Query regarding handling of ASP_ACTIVE_ACK message at ASP
Sun, 4 Feb 2007 04:44:30 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8499
RE: Question related with DAUD Message
Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:47:07 -0600
"Erickson, Mark" <[email protected]> • #8498
Re: R: testing Sigtran protocols
Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:09:19 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8497
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:35:42 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8496
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:44:31 -0500
Andrew Booth <[email protected]> • #8495
Re: Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:31:51 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8494
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Fri, 2 Feb 2007 03:55:32 +0800
"Luke Cai" <[email protected]> • #8493
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:59:19 +0000
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]> • #8492
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Thu, 1 Feb 2007 04:51:34 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8491
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:43:08 +0000
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]> • #8490
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:05:53 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8489
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:35:26 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8488
RE: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:11:25 -0700
"Colmenares, Oscar (Oscar)" <[email protected]> • #8487
RE: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:51:37 -0500
"Barry Nagelberg" <[email protected]> • #8486
RE: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:42:43 -0700
"Colmenares, Oscar (Oscar)" <[email protected]> • #8485
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:40:13 +0000
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]> • #8484
RE: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:22:54 -0700
"Colmenares, Oscar (Oscar)" <[email protected]> • #8483
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:15:24 +0000
"Ankit Kumar Sharma" <[email protected]> • #8482
RE: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:02:59 -0700
"Colmenares, Oscar (Oscar)" <[email protected]> • #8481
Re: Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:17:54 -0500
Andrew Booth <[email protected]> • #8480
Question related with DAUD Message
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:43:55 -0700
"Colmenares, Oscar (Oscar)" <[email protected]> • #8479
Re: SCTP - Mobile Ipv6
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:40:16 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8478
SCTP - Mobile Ipv6
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:52:15 +0100
Guillaume FORTAINE <[email protected]> • #8477
Re: testing Sigtran protocols
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:51:49 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8476
Re: M3UA IPSP
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:17:13 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8475
M3UA IPSP
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:20:49 -0500
"Claudia Lin" <[email protected]> • #8474
Re: testing Sigtran protocols
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:17:38 +0100
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> • #8473
testing Sigtran protocols
Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:37:44 +0100
"Troiano Marco" <[email protected]> • #8472
M3UA IPSP
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:13:41 -0500
"Claudia Lin" <[email protected]> • #8471
SIGTRAN Interop in Moscow from April 16th to 20th
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:55:04 +0100
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> • #8470
SCTP Multihoming Kernel Version
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:18:44 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #8469
Re: If ASPTM and ASPSM messages are sent from SGP ..?
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 05:01:05 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8468
Re: If ASPTM and ASPSM messages are sent from SGP ..?
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:14:47 +0700
"Sergey Mikhailov" <[email protected]> • #8467
If ASPTM and ASPSM messages are sent from SGP ..?
Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:38:16 +0530
Mahantesh <[email protected]> • #8466
Re: Help decoding parameter Diagnostic Information
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:15:27 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8465
Re: Help decoding parameter Diagnostic Information
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:56:48 +0100
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> • #8464
RE: Help decoding parameter Diagnostic Information
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:35:56 -0000
Fernandes, António Carlos, VF-PT <[email protected]> • #8463
Re: Help decoding parameter Diagnostic Information
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:45:01 +0100
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> • #8462
RE: Help decoding parameter Diagnostic Information
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:43:18 -0000
Fernandes, António Carlos, VF-PT <[email protected]> • #8461
Re: Help decoding parameter Diagnostic Information
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 23:23:59 +0700
"Sergey Mikhailov" <[email protected]> • #8460
Help decoding parameter Diagnostic Information
Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:52:36 -0000
Fernandes, António Carlos, VF-PT <[email protected]> • #8459
RE: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:22:25 -0500
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]> • #8458
RE: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:35:17 -0800 (PST)
Dario Filjar <[email protected]> • #8457
Re: Why Broadcast Traffic mode type is needed in M3UA
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 04:44:26 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8456
Why Broadcast Traffic mode type is needed in M3UA
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:53:31 +0530
"Kuldeep Janjua" <[email protected]> • #8455
Re: New RAI mailing list formed
Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:47:34 -0800
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> • #8454
New RAI mailing list formed
Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:49:04 -0800
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> • #8453
Re: New RAI mailing list formed
Sat, 13 Jan 2007 10:56:05 +0100
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> • #8452
Re: New RAI mailing list formed
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 21:35:37 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8451
New RAI mailing list formed
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:28:52 -0800
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> • #8450
Re: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:51:31 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8449
RE: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 16:29:11 -0500
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]> • #8448
Re: Conditional parameters !!
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:25:54 +0530
Mahantesh <[email protected]> • #8447
Re: Conditional parameters !!
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:53:56 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8446
Conditional parameters !!
Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:28:19 +0530
Mahantesh <[email protected]> • #8445
Re: SIGTRAN Interop 2007
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:41:14 +0100
Michael Tuexen <[email protected]> • #8444
Re: SIGTRAN Interop 2007
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:16:33 +0800
leizhuohui <[email protected]> • #8443
Re: Resolution::Cannot Support Unique Routing
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:02:55 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8442
Re: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:35:33 +0100
"Ilie Glib" <[email protected]> • #8441
Re: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:47:25 +0100
"Ilie Glib" <[email protected]> • #8440
RE: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:19:29 -0800 (PST)
Dario Filjar <[email protected]> • #8439
Re: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:25:53 +0100
"Ilie Glib" <[email protected]> • #8438
RE: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:32:03 -0500
"Tolga Asveren" <[email protected]> • #8437
Re: M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:16:29 +0100
"Ilie Glib" <[email protected]> • #8436
Resolution::Cannot Support Unique Routing
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:35:17 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #8435
Re: Need to know complete control message call flow for M2PA.
Fri, 5 Jan 2007 06:00:54 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8434
Re: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Fri, 5 Jan 2007 03:32:35 +0800
"Luke Cai" <[email protected]> • #8433
M3UA: Routing Key and Network Appearance?
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:46:14 -0800 (PST)
Dario Filjar <[email protected]> • #8432
Re: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:50:55 +0530
"Ashish Soregaonkar" <[email protected]> • #8431
RE: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:09:31 -0500
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]> • #8430
RE: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:04:45 -0500
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]> • #8429
Re: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:33:48 +0530
"Ashish Soregaonkar" <[email protected]> • #8428
RE: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:53:38 -0500
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]> • #8427
Re: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:31:59 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #8426
Re: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 19:20:42 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #8425
RE: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:44:21 -0500
"Haresign Lincoln" <[email protected]> • #8424
Re: LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:12:38 +0530
"Kuldeep Janjua" <[email protected]> • #8423
LinkSet-RouteSet in M3UA
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:01:33 +0530
"Ambika Tripathy" <[email protected]> • #8422
Re: What should be the behavior of ASP, when SCON message received with out congestion indication parameter
Mon, 1 Jan 2007 05:30:37 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8421
Re: What should be the behavior of ASP, when SCON message received with out congestion indication parameter
Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:17:55 +0530
"Pavan Kumar" <[email protected]> • #8420
Re: What should be the behavior of ASP, when SCON message received with out congestion indication parameter
Mon, 1 Jan 2007 03:14:29 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8419
What should be the behavior of ASP, when SCON message received with out congestion indication parameter
Mon, 1 Jan 2007 14:00:25 +0530
"Pavan Kumar" <[email protected]> • #8418
Re: 1 AS can have only 1 RK ?
Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:57:31 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8417
Re: 1 AS can have only 1 RK ?
Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:27:17 +0530
Mahantesh <[email protected]> • #8416
Re: 1 AS can have only 1 RK ?
Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:23:44 +0530
Bhanu Prakash <[email protected]> • #8415
Re: 1 AS can have only 1 RK ?
Wed, 27 Dec 2006 13:01:05 +0530
Mahantesh <[email protected]> • #8414
Re: 1 AS can have only 1 RK ?
Wed, 27 Dec 2006 00:27:36 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8413
1 AS can have only 1 RK ?
Wed, 27 Dec 2006 11:49:32 +0530
Mahantesh <[email protected]> • #8412
Re: Query on SCTP
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 02:21:56 -0700
"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]> • #8411
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.