gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical archive

1145 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 12). Latest articles →

bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Tue, 10 Jun 2025 21:42:52 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28424
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtes t and distutils patch — please review
Mon, 2 Jun 2025 22:53:33 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28423
Re: Request for review:added autopkgtest for king
Sun, 1 Jun 2025 20:49:59 +0200
Pierre Gruet <[email protected]> • #28422
Re: Request for review:added autopkgtest for king
Sun, 1 Jun 2025 11:21:44 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28421
Re: Request for review:added autopkgtest for king
Sat, 31 May 2025 22:39:39 +0200
Pierre Gruet <[email protected]> • #28420
Request for review:added autopkgtest for king
Thu, 29 May 2025 19:34:07 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28419
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtest and distutils patch — please review
Wed, 28 May 2025 13:05:51 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28418
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtes t and distutils patch — please review
Wed, 28 May 2025 10:52:12 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28417
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtes t and distutils patch — please review
Tue, 27 May 2025 23:02:51 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28416
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtest and distutils patch — please review
Mon, 26 May 2025 05:18:09 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28415
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtes t and distutils patch — please review
Sun, 25 May 2025 16:37:34 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28414
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtest and distutils patch — please review
Thu, 22 May 2025 06:28:56 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28413
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtes t and distutils patch — please review
Tue, 20 May 2025 22:38:33 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28412
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtest and distutils patch — please review
Mon, 19 May 2025 20:54:04 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28411
Fwd: Fwd: Invitation to rejoin our EU COST action proposal
Sat, 17 May 2025 20:28:24 +0700
Henning (né Enric) Garcia Torrents <[email protected]> • #28410
Re: Introduction as a GSOC 2025 Contributor
Fri, 16 May 2025 22:38:49 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28409
Re: Introduction as a GSOC 2025 Contributor
Fri, 16 May 2025 07:55:25 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28408
Re: Introduction as a GSOC 2025 Contributor
Fri, 16 May 2025 07:37:49 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28407
Re: Introduction as a GSOC 2025 Contributor
Thu, 15 May 2025 23:03:35 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28406
Re: Introduction as a GSOC 2025 Contributor
Thu, 15 May 2025 19:56:26 +0200
Pierre Gruet <[email protected]> • #28405
Introduction as a GSOC 2025 Contributor
Thu, 15 May 2025 17:16:19 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28404
Re: meeting request
Wed, 14 May 2025 17:31:29 +0530
Akhil Patil <[email protected]> • #28403
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtest and distutils patch — please review
Wed, 7 May 2025 19:28:39 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28402
Re: [metaphlan] Added autopkgtes t and distutils patch — please review
Mon, 5 May 2025 22:34:38 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28401
[metaphlan] Added autopkgtest an d distutils patch — please review
Sat, 3 May 2025 09:28:00 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28400
Re: GNUmed (-client/-server): new upstream available
Sun, 27 Apr 2025 23:35:24 +0200
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #28399
Re: GNUmed (-client/-server): new upstream available
Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:32:39 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28398
Re: GNUmed (-client/-server): new upstream available
Sun, 27 Apr 2025 18:36:19 +0200
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #28397
GNUmed (-client/-server): new upstream available
Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:46:52 +0200
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #28396
Processed: owner 1088167
Sun, 20 Apr 2025 11:15:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #28395
Re: Added Autopkgtests for BitSe q – Request for Review
Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:36:26 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28394
Restricting freecontact to 64 bit architectures
Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:12:42 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28393
Re: RFS: libzeep version 6
Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:16:22 +0200
"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> • #28392
Added Autopkgtests for BitSeq – Request for Review
Wed, 16 Apr 2025 20:30:19 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28391
Re: Planning to remove team-based R packages from 32-bit and big-endian architectures.
Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:16:49 -0500
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> • #28390
Re: Planning to remove team-based R packages from 32-bit and big-endian architectures.
Wed, 16 Apr 2025 19:24:30 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #28389
Re: Planning to remove team-based R packages from 32-bit and big-endian architectures.
Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:55:04 -0500
Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> • #28388
Re: Planning to remove team-based R packages from 32-bit and big-endian architectures.
Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:31:22 +0200
Paul Gevers <[email protected]> • #28387
Planning to remove team-based R packages from 32-bit and big-endian architectures.
Wed, 16 Apr 2025 23:04:47 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28386
Re: Questions about creating test files and workflow for BitSeq
Fri, 11 Apr 2025 10:14:56 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28385
Re: Questions about creating test files and workflow for BitSeq
Thu, 10 Apr 2025 21:57:55 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28384
Re: Questions about creating test files and workflow for BitSeq
Thu, 10 Apr 2025 23:37:44 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28383
Questions about creating test files and workflow for BitSeq
Thu, 10 Apr 2025 21:08:36 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28382
Re: RFS: libzeep version 6
Thu, 10 Apr 2025 22:49:53 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28381
Re: Added Autopkgtests for BitSeq – Request for Review
Thu, 3 Apr 2025 21:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28380
Re: Added Autopkgtests for BitSe q – Request for Review
Thu, 3 Apr 2025 23:15:18 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28379
Added Autopkgtests for BitSeq – Request for Review
Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:17:45 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28378
Re: GNUmed 1.8.20 Maintenance Release
Wed, 2 Apr 2025 20:24:42 +0200
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #28377
libbio-db-swissprot-perl is marked for autoremoval from testing
Wed, 02 Apr 2025 04:39:19 +0000
Debian testing autoremoval watch <[email protected]> • #28376
libbio-db-refseq-perl is marked for autoremoval from testing
Wed, 02 Apr 2025 04:39:20 +0000
Debian testing autoremoval watch <[email protected]> • #28375
Re: GNUmed 1.8.20 Maintenance Release
Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:22:48 -0300
Emmanuel Arias <[email protected]> • #28374
Re: bali-phy not building on armel and armhf
Tue, 1 Apr 2025 23:11:07 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28373
Re: tortoize test on s390x segfaults
Tue, 1 Apr 2025 22:37:32 +0200
"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> • #28372
Re: tortoize test on s390x segfaults
Tue, 1 Apr 2025 23:16:07 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28371
tortoize test on s390x segfaults
Tue, 1 Apr 2025 12:49:22 +0200
"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> • #28370
GNUmed 1.8.20 Maintenance Release
Sun, 30 Mar 2025 13:42:53 +0200
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #28369
Re: Solved package dependencies problem in camitk
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 06:49:07 +0100
Emmanuel Promayon <[email protected]> • #28368
Re: Solved package dependencies problem in camitk
Tue, 25 Mar 2025 22:10:45 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28367
Re: Solved package dependencies problem in camitk
Tue, 25 Mar 2025 19:28:26 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28366
Re: Solved package dependencies problem in camitk
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 14:56:11 +0100
Emmanuel Promayon <[email protected]> • #28365
Solved package dependencies problem in camitk
Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:17:09 +0100
Emmanuel Promayon <[email protected]> • #28364
Re: bali-phy not building on armel and armhf
Sat, 15 Mar 2025 10:40:01 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28363
Re: bits proposal / Re: Text proposal after Debian-Med sprint in February
Fri, 14 Mar 2025 22:34:09 +0100
Pierre Gruet <[email protected]> • #28362
bali-phy not building on armel and armhf
Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:19:47 -0400
Benjamin Redelings <[email protected]> • #28361
Re: [igraph] [PATCH] Two important packaging improvements for igraph
Sun, 9 Mar 2025 17:32:02 +0100
Jerome BENOIT <[email protected]> • #28360
Re: [igraph] [PATCH] Two important packaging improvements for igraph
Fri, 07 Mar 2025 11:02:09 +0100
Aymeric Agon-Rambosson <[email protected]> • #28359
Re: [igraph] [PATCH] Two important packaging improvements for igraph
Thu, 6 Mar 2025 20:33:59 +0100
Jerome BENOIT <[email protected]> • #28358
[igraph] [PATCH] Two important packaging improvements for igraph
Thu, 06 Mar 2025 18:02:54 +0100
Aymeric Agon-Rambosson <[email protected]> • #28357
Re: New bali-phy version 4.0
Sat, 1 Mar 2025 09:37:16 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28356
New bali-phy version 4.0
Fri, 28 Feb 2025 08:54:21 -0500
Benjamin Redelings <[email protected]> • #28355
Re: RFS: libzeep version 6
Mon, 24 Feb 2025 20:43:14 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28354
Re: Packages with a history of security issues and whose packaged version is not up to date
Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:24:06 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28353
Bug#1078626: marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 16:04:29 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28352
Bug#1078626: marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 15:09:07 +0100
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #28351
Bug#1078626: marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 14:13:26 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28350
Bug#1078626: marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 13:00:48 +0100
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #28349
Bug#1078626: marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:39:40 +0100
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #28348
Bug#1078626: marked as done (libbio-procedural-perl: Tries to access the network during build)
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:27:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #28347
Bug#1078626: marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:21:59 +0100
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #28346
Processed: Re: Bug#1078626: marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:27:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #28345
Bug#1078626: marked as done (libbio-procedural-perl: will FTBFS during trixie support period)
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:09:03 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #28344
Bug#1078626: marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:06:17 +0100
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #28343
Bug#1078626: marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:58:59 +0100
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #28342
Processed: Bug#1078626 marked as pending in libbio-procedural-perl
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 09:48:02 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #28341
Re: missing pkg_resources dependencies
Sun, 16 Feb 2025 01:54:16 +0100
Alexandre Detiste <[email protected]> • #28340
Processed: Will FTBFS during trixie support period
Sat, 15 Feb 2025 11:51:08 +0000
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <[email protected]> • #28339
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:49:06 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28338
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:52:14 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28337
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:54:07 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28336
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:36:30 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28335
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 21:09:13 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28334
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:01:14 -0300
Emmanuel Arias <[email protected]> • #28333
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:56:55 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28332
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:42:27 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28331
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:38:21 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28330
Re: RFS: libzeep version 6
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:58:24 +0100
"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> • #28329
Re: Proposals for GSoC25
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:06:55 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28328
Proposals for GSoC25
Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:59:11 +0530
Abhijith PA <[email protected]> • #28327
Re: RFS: libzeep version 6
Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:18:48 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28326
Re: htslib ecosystem 1.21
Thu, 6 Feb 2025 21:56:50 +0100
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28325
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.