gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical archive

1145 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 12). Latest articles →

Help for ciftilib needed
Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:43:37 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28524
Removing gbrowse?
Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:08:36 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28523
Re: Status of lambda-align
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 12:41:07 +0200
Sascha Steinbiss <[email protected]> • #28522
Status of lambda-align
Thu, 16 Oct 2025 09:20:26 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28521
Re: [Attention: Expediteur suspect] Re: Ogre > 1.12
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 22:14:57 +0200
Flavien Bridault <[email protected]> • #28520
Re: Ogre > 1.12
Mon, 13 Oct 2025 21:12:29 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28519
iqtree upload to unstable to fix rc bugs
Wed, 8 Oct 2025 21:29:53 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28518
Re: Ogre > 1.12
Sun, 5 Oct 2025 11:06:29 +0200
Flavien Bridault <[email protected]> • #28517
Re: Ogre > 1.12
Sat, 4 Oct 2025 21:55:21 +0200
Antoine Le Gonidec <[email protected]> • #28516
Re: Ogre > 1.12
Sat, 4 Oct 2025 17:13:50 +0200
Flavien Bridault <[email protected]> • #28515
Re: Ogre > 1.12
Sat, 4 Oct 2025 15:33:02 +0200
Alexandre Detiste <[email protected]> • #28514
Re: Who hosted Debian Med sprint in 2018 in Barcelona
Thu, 2 Oct 2025 13:53:23 +0200
Sascha Steinbiss <[email protected]> • #28513
Re: Who hosted Debian Med sprint in 2018 in Barcelona
Wed, 1 Oct 2025 13:56:06 +0000
Matus Kalas <[email protected]> • #28512
Inviting Debian Science contributors to Debian Med sprint (Was: Who hosted Debian Med sprint in 2018 in Barcelona)
Wed, 1 Oct 2025 07:41:05 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28511
Re: Who hosted Debian Med sprint in 2018 in Barcelona
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 23:23:33 +0200
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <[email protected]> • #28510
Re: Who hosted Debian Med sprint in 2018 in Barcelona
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:12:31 +0200
"Michael R. Crusoe" <[email protected]> • #28509
Who hosted Debian Med sprint in 2018 in Barcelona
Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:49:45 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28508
Re: ncbi-cxx-toolkit-public - a monorepo for NCBI tools?
Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:48:51 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28507
Bug#1116608: RFS: python-awkward/2.8.9-1 -- manipulate JSON-like data with NumPy-like idioms
Mon, 29 Sep 2025 07:39:49 +0530
Aryan Karamtoth <[email protected]> • #28506
Re: ncbi-cxx-toolkit-public - a monorepo for NCBI tools?
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 10:43:28 -0400
"Aaron M. Ucko" <[email protected]> • #28505
ncbi-cxx-toolkit-public - a monorepo for NCBI tools?
Thu, 25 Sep 2025 09:36:06 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28504
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 21:53:51 +0200
Santiago Vila <[email protected]> • #28503
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 21:37:49 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28502
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Mon, 22 Sep 2025 12:31:04 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28501
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Thu, 18 Sep 2025 08:43:28 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28500
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 23:51:23 +0200
"Andrea Pappacoda" <[email protected]> • #28499
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Wed, 17 Sep 2025 02:22:47 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28498
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Tue, 16 Sep 2025 21:53:37 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28497
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Sat, 13 Sep 2025 08:22:15 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28496
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 20:09:48 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28495
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 20:09:01 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28494
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 23:28:09 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28493
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 17:25:00 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28492
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:49:41 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28491
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 23:10:18 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28490
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:25:16 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28489
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 16:03:52 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28488
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:16:24 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28487
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Thu, 11 Sep 2025 03:11:48 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28486
Re: Do we still need pristine-tar?
Wed, 10 Sep 2025 22:36:23 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28485
Re: libcifpp update
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 14:05:50 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28484
Re: libcifpp update
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 11:23:52 +0200
"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> • #28483
Re: libcifpp update
Tue, 9 Sep 2025 09:40:29 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28482
Re: libcifpp update
Mon, 8 Sep 2025 20:13:15 +0200
"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> • #28481
Re: libcifpp update
Mon, 8 Sep 2025 17:10:31 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28480
Re: libcifpp update
Mon, 8 Sep 2025 11:36:24 +0200
"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> • #28479
Re: libcifpp update
Mon, 8 Sep 2025 10:15:22 +0300
Andrius Merkys <[email protected]> • #28478
libcifpp update
Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:04:03 +0200
"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> • #28477
Re: [tag2upload 884] failed, htslib 1.22.1+ds2-1
Fri, 5 Sep 2025 09:38:10 +0100
Ian Jackson <[email protected]> • #28476
Re: [tag2upload 884] failed, htslib 1.22.1+ds2-1
Fri, 5 Sep 2025 08:20:21 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28475
Re: [tag2upload 884] failed, htslib 1.22.1+ds2-1
Thu, 4 Sep 2025 23:28:57 +0100
Ian Jackson <[email protected]> • #28474
Re: [tag2upload 884] failed, htslib 1.22.1+ds2-1
Fri, 5 Sep 2025 00:15:19 +0200
"Michael R. Crusoe" <[email protected]> • #28473
Re: [tag2upload 884] failed, htslib 1.22.1+ds2-1
Thu, 4 Sep 2025 15:54:29 +0100
Ian Jackson <[email protected]> • #28472
Re: [tag2upload 884] failed, htslib 1.22.1+ds2-1
Thu, 4 Sep 2025 16:43:30 +0200
"Michael R. Crusoe" <[email protected]> • #28471
Do we still need pristine-tar?
Thu, 4 Sep 2025 21:07:12 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28470
Re: mcfp is stuck, what to do?
Thu, 4 Sep 2025 13:47:11 +0200
"Michael R. Crusoe" <[email protected]> • #28469
mcfp is stuck, what to do?
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 21:50:19 +0200
"Maarten L. Hekkelman" <[email protected]> • #28468
Re: Salsa CI potentially used in vain at med-team/ugene
Tue, 2 Sep 2025 09:57:27 +0530
Aayush Raj <[email protected]> • #28467
Re: new public database
Fri, 29 Aug 2025 20:50:21 +0200
Karsten Hilbert <[email protected]> • #28466
Re: Salsa CI potentially used in vain at med-team/ugene
Fri, 29 Aug 2025 07:41:21 +0200
Pierre Gruet <[email protected]> • #28465
Re: Salsa CI potentially used in vain at med-team/ugene
Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:21:11 +0200
"Michael R. Crusoe" <[email protected]> • #28464
new public database
Sun, 24 Aug 2025 18:05:54 +0200
Karsten Hilbert via Gnumed-announce <[email protected]> • #28463
Re: Request to move python-awkward under the umbrella of Debian Python Team
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 21:53:46 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28462
Bug#1111909: ITP: macsylib -- model and detech macromolecular systems & genetic pathways
Sat, 23 Aug 2025 15:50:29 +0100
"Michael R. Crusoe" <[email protected]> • #28461
Re: Request to move python-awkward under the umbrella of Debian Python Team
Fri, 22 Aug 2025 13:51:22 +0530
Aryan Karamtoth <[email protected]> • #28460
Re: Request to move python-awkward under the umbrella of Debian Python Team
Fri, 22 Aug 2025 09:27:43 +0200
Sascha Steinbiss <[email protected]> • #28459
Re: Request to move python-awkward under the umbrella of Debian Python Team
Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:45:03 +0530
Aryan Karamtoth <[email protected]> • #28458
Re: Request to move python-awkward under the umbrella of Debian Python Team
Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:21:31 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28457
Request to move python-awkward under the umbrella of Debian Python Team
Thu, 21 Aug 2025 20:29:52 +0530
Aryan Karamtoth <[email protected]> • #28456
Re: Compiling with gcc 15
Tue, 19 Aug 2025 14:49:19 +0200
Sébastien Jodogne <[email protected]> • #28455
Re: Compiling with gcc 15
Mon, 11 Aug 2025 22:24:19 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28454
Bug#1110863: RM: ghemical -- RoQA; not in trixie, depends on obsolete libglade2
Mon, 11 Aug 2025 16:47:54 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #28453
Compiling with gcc 15
Mon, 11 Aug 2025 12:03:56 +0200
Sébastien Jodogne <[email protected]> • #28452
Re: Debian Science BOF in Debconf 25?
Mon, 11 Aug 2025 06:52:35 +0200
Anton Gladky <[email protected]> • #28451
Package PyVCF3 as regular successor of PyVCF?
Sat, 2 Aug 2025 21:48:46 +0000
Steffen Möller <[email protected]> • #28450
FYI: ITP: dualword-rt -- computer program for measuring bimanual simple visual reaction time
Fri, 1 Aug 2025 13:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
Alexander Busorgin <[email protected]> • #28449
Crude initial packaging of neoantigen pipeline
Thu, 31 Jul 2025 21:15:51 +0000
Steffen Möller <[email protected]> • #28448
Re: Using hwcaps instead of simde dispatcher scripts?
Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:04:18 +0200
Christian Kastner <[email protected]> • #28447
Re: Using hwcaps instead of simde dispatcher scripts?
Sun, 27 Jul 2025 13:40:16 +0200
"Michael R. Crusoe" <[email protected]> • #28446
Using hwcaps instead of simde dispatcher scripts?
Sat, 26 Jul 2025 23:02:00 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28445
Re: Aw: Aw: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages
Fri, 25 Jul 2025 18:46:11 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28444
Aw: Aw: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages
Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:40:59 +0000
Steffen Möller <[email protected]> • #28443
Aw: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages
Mon, 21 Jul 2025 15:14:17 +0000
Steffen Möller <[email protected]> • #28442
Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages
Fri, 18 Jul 2025 21:59:28 +0900
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> • #28441
Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages
Fri, 18 Jul 2025 12:50:06 +0000
Steffen Möller <[email protected]> • #28440
Re: Autopkgtest added for package staden
Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:31:07 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28439
Re: Autopkgtest added for package staden
Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:39:06 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28438
Re: Autopkgtest added for package staden
Sun, 6 Jul 2025 15:24:13 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28437
Autopkgtest added for package staden
Sat, 5 Jul 2025 20:50:53 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28436
Re: Push the add of ROCm and Pocl autopkgtest for Examl
Fri, 20 Jun 2025 21:24:39 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28435
Re: bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Wed, 18 Jun 2025 23:26:35 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28434
Re: bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Wed, 18 Jun 2025 19:23:29 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28433
Missing on Salsa: sideretro
Wed, 18 Jun 2025 12:36:38 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #28432
Re: bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Tue, 17 Jun 2025 22:23:32 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28431
Re: bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 20:02:41 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28430
Re: bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 17:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
harish chavre <[email protected]> • #28429
Re: bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:43:49 +0530
Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> • #28428
Re: bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:09:56 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28427
Re: bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Thu, 12 Jun 2025 04:34:23 +0000
Ananthu C V <[email protected]> • #28426
Re: bitseq - Clarification on autopkgtest setup for 32-bit.
Wed, 11 Jun 2025 22:59:00 +0200
Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> • #28425
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.