gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical archive
1145 archived articles, newest first (page 8 of 12). Latest articles →
Re: python-cogent [Was: Bug#950598: Chain of Dependencies prevents closing RC bugs]
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 09:11:55 +0200Re: python-cogent [Was: Bug#950598: Chain of Dependencies prevents closing RC bugs]
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:28:10 -0300Re: python-cogent [Was: Bug#950598: Chain of Dependencies prevents closing RC bugs]
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 03:14:26 +0530python-cogent [Was: Bug#950598: Chain of Dependencies prevents closing RC bugs]
Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:19:43 +0200Re: package bcftools dependencies for gff2gff.py and guess-ploidy.py cause bcftools to have 10x as many dependencies
Tue, 25 Jun 2024 10:08:24 -0400Re: Bug#950598: Chain of Dependencies prevents closing RC bugs
Tue, 25 Jun 2024 14:38:59 +0100Re: package bcftools dependencies for gff2gff.py and guess-ploidy.py cause bcftools to have 10x as many dependencies
Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:42:28 +0900Re: package bcftools dependencies for gff2gff.py and guess-ploidy.py cause bcftools to have 10x as many dependencies
Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:40:46 +0900Re: [Help] Re: [bredelings/BAli-Phy] Test suite error in 4.0-beta7 (Issue #17)]
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 23:20:32 -0400Re: [Help] Re: [bredelings/BAli-Phy] Test suite error in 4.0-beta7 (Issue #17)]
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 23:16:51 -0400Re: If someone wants to join (Was: Any input for some talk about usage of Debian in HPC)
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 16:36:43 +0200If someone wants to join (Was: Any input for some talk about usage of Debian in HPC)
Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:15:30 +0200Re: package bcftools dependencies for gff2gff.py and guess-ploidy.py cause bcftools to have 10x as many dependencies
Wed, 19 Jun 2024 21:50:45 +0200Re: package bcftools dependencies for gff2gff.py and guess-ploidy.py cause bcftools to have 10x as many dependencies
Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:04:21 -0400Re: package bcftools dependencies for gff2gff.py and guess-ploidy.py cause bcftools to have 10x as many dependencies
Tue, 18 Jun 2024 21:03:06 +0200Re: Upgrading fis-gtm and closing CVE-2021-44496 CVE-2021-44504
Tue, 18 Jun 2024 16:51:54 +0200Fwd: SPAdes 4.0 is released!
Wed, 5 Jun 2024 18:58:57 +0200Re: SONAME transition vs reverse dependencies
Tue, 4 Jun 2024 22:19:21 +0200Re: SONAME transition vs reverse dependencies
Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:29:12 +0530SONAME transition vs reverse dependencies
Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:11:29 +0200Re: Migration to htslib ecosystem 1.20.
Sun, 2 Jun 2024 10:02:58 +0200Re: Migration to htslib ecosystem 1.20.
Fri, 31 May 2024 09:48:48 +0200Re: Migration to htslib ecosystem 1.20.
Thu, 30 May 2024 21:06:11 +0200Migration to htslib ecosystem 1.20.
Thu, 30 May 2024 20:17:25 +0200Re: [Help] Re: [bredelings/BAli-Phy] Test suite error in 4.0-beta7 (Issue #17)]
Thu, 30 May 2024 07:31:50 +0200Re: [Help] Re: [bredelings/BAli-Phy] Test suite error in 4.0-beta7 (Issue #17)]
Wed, 29 May 2024 09:39:01 +0200[Help] Re: [bredelings/BAli-Phy] Test suite error in 4.0-beta7 (Issue #17)]
Tue, 28 May 2024 23:01:39 +0200Re: Any input for some talk about usage of Debian in HPC
Mon, 20 May 2024 21:51:57 +0100Re: Any input for some talk about usage of Debian in HPC
Mon, 20 May 2024 15:00:11 -0500Re: Any input for some talk about usage of Debian in HPC
Sun, 19 May 2024 21:47:07 -0700Re: Any input for some talk about usage of Debian in HPC
Sun, 19 May 2024 15:31:02 +0100Any input for some talk about usage of Debian in HPC
Sun, 19 May 2024 13:12:40 +0200Re: Action needed for R-pkg Uploaders
Thu, 09 May 2024 21:40:03 +0200Re: Action needed for R-pkg Uploaders
Tue, 7 May 2024 13:20:28 +0000Re: Action needed for R-pkg Uploaders
Tue, 7 May 2024 16:05:18 +0300Re: Action needed for R-pkg Uploaders
Tue, 7 May 2024 14:53:40 +0200Re: emboss and python-biopython stuck in Building state
Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:39:10 +0200Re: emboss and python-biopython stuck in Building state
Thu, 25 Apr 2024 18:11:57 +0200Could someone have a look into bali-phy [[email protected]: Re: [bredelings/BAli-Phy] Test suite error in 4.0-beta7 (Issue #17)]
Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:43:32 +0200Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client
Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:12:06 -0400Re: Binary conflict between Midnight Commander and MinIO Client
Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:41:36 +0200If someone might care for raxml-ng this would be great (Was: [amkozlov/raxml-ng] What libpll code is really needed (Issue #164))
Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:25:41 +0200Re: [amkozlov/raxml-ng] What libpll code is really needed (Issue #164)
Fri, 18 Aug 2023 14:17:07 -0700Re: emboss and python-biopython stuck in Building state
Wed, 24 Apr 2024 09:02:54 +0300Re: emboss and python-biopython stuck in Building state
Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:38:23 +0200Re: emboss and python-biopython stuck in Building state
Tue, 23 Apr 2024 19:25:49 +0200emboss and python-biopython stuck in Building state
Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:28:33 +0300Re: Status of the t64 transition
Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:20:38 +0200Re: Status of the t64 transition
Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:49:15 +0200Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:27:00 +0200Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Wed, 17 Apr 2024 15:20:27 +0300Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Tue, 16 Apr 2024 21:31:11 +0200Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Tue, 16 Apr 2024 19:33:15 +0530Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:52:01 +0300Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:34:27 +0530Bug#1069098: emboss: all executables segfault on s390x
Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:50:47 +0300Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:40:40 +0300Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:23:41 -0400Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Mon, 15 Apr 2024 13:03:47 -0500Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Mon, 15 Apr 2024 10:06:00 +0300We are currently maintaining exactly 1000 packages in main
Sun, 14 Apr 2024 15:46:56 +0200Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x
Sun, 14 Apr 2024 15:42:42 +0200Re: Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf
Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:41:17 +0530Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf
Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:53:08 +0200Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:33:53 -0700Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:59:27 -0400Re: Bug#1068766: RM: maude [i386 armhf armel] -- ROM; Unsuitable for release on 32-bit archs
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 22:13:06 +0530Re: Bug#1068766: RM: maude [i386 armhf armel] -- ROM; Unsuitable for release on 32-bit archs
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:59:13 +0200Bug#1068766: RM: maude [i386 armhf armel] -- ROM; Unsuitable for release on 32-bit archs
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:15:02 +0530Re: Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:49:29 +0200Re: libcifpp updated
Wed, 10 Apr 2024 10:49:58 +0300Bug#1067957: [[maude-bugs]] [EXTERNAL] Re: Maude fails to build on armhf
Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:56:53 -0700Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [[maude-bugs]] Maude fails to build on armhf
Tue, 9 Apr 2024 09:01:45 +0200Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [[maude-bugs]] Maude fails to build on armhf
Mon, 8 Apr 2024 15:38:50 -0700Re: Maude fails to build on armhf
Sun, 7 Apr 2024 20:58:04 +0530Maude fails to build on armhf
Sun, 7 Apr 2024 19:45:33 +0530Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:29:08 -0500Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Sat, 6 Apr 2024 14:47:22 +0200Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Sat, 6 Apr 2024 14:40:39 +0200Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Sat, 6 Apr 2024 14:39:10 +0200Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Sat, 6 Apr 2024 14:37:41 +0200Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Sat, 6 Apr 2024 14:32:27 +0200Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Sat, 6 Apr 2024 14:22:13 +0200Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Sat, 6 Apr 2024 14:21:51 +0200libcifpp updated
Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:32:35 +0200Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Tue, 2 Apr 2024 07:54:26 +0200Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Mon, 1 Apr 2024 21:12:49 +0200Re: Upgrading fis-gtm and closing CVE-2021-44496 CVE-2021-44504
Mon, 1 Apr 2024 14:51:26 +0200Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1062404: orthanc-python: flaky autopkgtest: Test failed with
Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:24:25 +0100Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1062404: orthanc-python: flaky autopkgtest: Test failed with
Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:13:24 +0100Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1062404: orthanc-python: flaky autopkgtest: Test failed with
Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:34:43 +0530Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1062404: orthanc-python: flaky autopkgtest: Test failed with
Sat, 30 Mar 2024 14:26:07 +0100Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1062404: orthanc-python: flaky autopkgtest: Test failed with
Sat, 30 Mar 2024 18:01:21 +0530Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1062404: orthanc-python: flaky autopkgtest: Test failed with
Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:51:56 +0100Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1062404: orthanc-python: flaky autopkgtest: Test failed with
Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:11:52 +0530Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#1062404: orthanc-python: flaky autopkgtest: Test failed with
Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:28:45 +0100Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Fri, 29 Mar 2024 17:00:12 -0700Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Fri, 29 Mar 2024 13:44:15 -0500Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Fri, 29 Mar 2024 16:56:25 +0200Re: Debian-Med policy proposal: 64-bit & little-endian only* for new packages
Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:27:11 +0100
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.