gmane.linux.drivers.eepro100.devel archive

664 archived articles, newest first (page 6 of 7). Latest articles →

Re: card reports no resources
Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:50:03 -0700
Nate Amsden <[email protected]> • #164
card reports no resources
Thu, 01 Aug 2002 17:31:07 -0400
John Ketchum <[email protected]> • #163
Re: update eepro100 driver
Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:28:38 +0800 (Singapore Standard Time)
Wei Keong <[email protected]> • #162
Re: Unresolved symbols, pci-scan.c and 2.2.14-5.0smp
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:25:38 +0300
"Sami Pitko" <[email protected]> • #161
Re: 82562ET
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:42:35 +0800 (Singapore Standard Time)
Wei Keong <[email protected]> • #160
Re: IPSEC support
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 22:17:59 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #159
IPSEC support
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:10:44 -0300 (BRT)
Roberto Jung Drebes <[email protected]> • #158
Re: eth0: card reports no resources.
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 09:42:03 +1000
Andrew Pollock <[email protected]> • #157
(no subject)
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:20:30
<[email protected]> • #156
Re: 82562ET
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:19:03 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #155
Re: eth0: card reports no resources.
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 12:16:44 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #154
Re: eth0: card reports no resources.
Mon, 29 Jul 2002 14:22:44 +1000
Andrew Pollock <[email protected]> • #153
82562ET
Sun, 28 Jul 2002 15:09:07 +1000 (EST)
Graeme Robinson <[email protected]> • #152
eepro100.c:v1.24 7/25/2002 -- updated eepro100.c version
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:13:08 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #151
eth0: can't fill rx buffer (force 1)!
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:34:45 +0800 (Singapore Standard Time)
Wei Keong <[email protected]> • #150
eth0: card reports no resources.
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:33:39 +1000
Andrew Pollock <[email protected]> • #149
trouble linking eepro100 and pci-scan into 2.4.18 kernel (unresolved symbols)
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 15:36:39 -0700
"Ryan S. Upton" <[email protected]> • #148
Re: eepro100 and Compaq Evo N600c Notebook
Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:58:11 +0200 (CEST)
Roman Hochleitner <[email protected]> • #147
Re: [eepro100-bug] binding eth0 to a particular card
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:38:49 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #146
binding eth0 to a particular card
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 10:51:37 -0700
Kallol Biswas <[email protected]> • #145
Re: eepro100 and Compaq Evo N600c Notebook
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:57:02 -0700
Kallol Biswas <[email protected]> • #144
Re: eepro100 and Compaq Evo N600c Notebook
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 13:49:31 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #143
eepro100 and Compaq Evo N600c Notebook
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 14:36:03 +0200 (CEST)
Roman Hochleitner <[email protected]> • #142
sleep mode bit causes Pro/100 V 82559 to transmit timeout at 10mbps
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:57:14 -0700
Kallol Biswas <[email protected]> • #141
Re: [eepro100-bug] sleep mode bit causes Pro/100 V 82559 to transmit timeout at 10mbps
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 06:33:24 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #140
freeze
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:25:32 +0200
Patrick Cipiere <[email protected]> • #139
netdrivers-3.1-1.src.rpm doesn't build on my machine
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:54:00 -0700
"H&G" <[email protected]> • #138
Re: PC with Intel D845BG motherboard hangs up
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 12:59:37 +1000
Lucian Daniel Kafka <[email protected]> • #137
Re: [eepro100-bug] PC with Intel D845BG motherboard hangs up
Fri, 12 Jul 2002 21:58:33 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #136
PC with Intel D845BG motherboard hangs up
Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:35:30 -0700
"H&G" <[email protected]> • #135
Re: Kernel oops with eepro100? Can this be confirmed?
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:49:25 -0500
"Matthew Callaway" <[email protected]> • #134
Re: Kernel oops with eepro100? Can this be confirmed?
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:49:12 -0500
"Matthew Callaway" <[email protected]> • #133
Re: Kernel oops with eepro100? Can this be confirmed?
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:48:22 -0500
"Matthew Callaway" <[email protected]> • #132
Re: Kernel oops with eepro100? Can this be confirmed?
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:51:59 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #131
Kernel oops with eepro100? Can this be confirmed?
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:00:48 -0500 (CDT)
Matthew Callaway <[email protected]> • #130
Re: problems detecting eepro100 on RH 7.2 kernel 2.4.10
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 01:29:47 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #129
problems detecting eepro100 on RH 7.2 kernel 2.4.10
Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
Victor Chang <[email protected]> • #128
URGENT & CONFIDENTIAL
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:59:08 +0100 (BST)
musa ibrahim <[email protected]> • #127
URGENT & CONFIDENTIAL
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:54:57 +0100 (BST)
musa ibrahim <[email protected]> • #126
URGENT & CONFIDENTIAL
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 17:33:41 +0100 (BST)
musa ibrahim <[email protected]> • #125
URGENT AND CONFIDENTIAL
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 09:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
santalaw habi <[email protected]> • #124
Re: PCI EtherExpress Pro100 82557 "reports no resources"- "no rx buffers"
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 09:36:52 -0400
Ian Zapczynski <[email protected]> • #123
eepro100 question
Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
krishna kumar rangan <[email protected]> • #122
Re: PCI EtherExpress Pro100 82557 "reports no resources" - "no rx buffers"
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 16:11:44 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #121
PCI EtherExpress Pro100 82557 "reports no resources" - "no rx buffers"
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 14:45:16 -0400
Ian Zapczynski <[email protected]> • #120
Re: eth0: Unknown receiver errors ??
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 19:49:04 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #119
eth0: Unknown receiver errors ??
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:30:28 -0700
"G-man" <[email protected]> • #118
Re: Command 0000 was not immediately accepted, BLAH ticks??..
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 16:43:57 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #117
Re: Command 0000 was not immediately accepted, BLAH ticks??..
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 12:54:11 -0700
"G-man" <[email protected]> • #116
RE: eepro100 on SuSE Linux
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 08:20:54 -0400
"Olson, John C" <[email protected]> • #115
RE: eepro100 on SuSE Linux
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:17:57 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #114
RE: eepro100 on SuSE Linux
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 16:22:44 -0400
"Olson, John C" <[email protected]> • #113
Re: eepro100 on SuSE Linux
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 14:33:11 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #112
eepro100 on SuSE Linux
Wed, 26 Jun 2002 13:39:57 -0400
"Olson, John C" <[email protected]> • #111
Re: wait_for_cmd_done timeout!
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 07:38:22 -0700
Michael Barnes <[email protected]> • #110
wait_for_cmd_done timeout!
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 03:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Terence Leung <[email protected]> • #109
Re: RE: WATCHDOG timeout
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 13:47:07 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #108
RE: WATCHDOG timeout
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 10:42:32 -0700
"Afzal, Naeem M" <[email protected]> • #107
Re: WATCHDOG timeout
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 11:56:39 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #106
WATCHDOG timeout
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:45:46 -0700
"Afzal, Naeem M" <[email protected]> • #105
Re: RedHat 7.3 & vpn client 3.5.2 on T23
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 10:19:57 -0700
Michael Barnes <[email protected]> • #104
Re: RedHat 7.3 & vpn client 3.5.2 on T23
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 02:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #103
Re: RedHat 7.3 & vpn client 3.5.2 on T23
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 23:28:38 -0700
Michael Barnes <[email protected]> • #102
Re: RedHat 7.3 & vpn client 3.5.2 on T23
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 01:20:33 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #101
Re: RedHat 7.3 & vpn client 3.5.2 on T23
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:28:06 -0700
Michael Barnes <[email protected]> • #100
Re: RedHat 7.3 & vpn client 3.5.2 on T23
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:07:31 -0700
Michael Barnes <[email protected]> • #99
Re: RedHat 7.3 & vpn client 3.5.2 on T23
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 21:20:45 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #98
RedHat 7.3 & vpn client 3.5.2 on T23
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:14:53 -0700
Michael Barnes <[email protected]> • #97
RedHat 7.3 & vpn client 3.5.2 on T23
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:03:04 -0700
Michael Barnes <[email protected]> • #96
Re: eepro100 in 10Mbit mode
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 14:19:34 -0500 (CDT)
Amit Kucheria <[email protected]> • #95
[Fwd: Re: Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad]
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:57:20 +0200
John Sved <[email protected]> • #94
Re: eepro100 in 10Mbit mode
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 10:20:27 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #93
eepro100 in 10Mbit mode
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 01:20:35 -0500 (CDT)
Amit Kucheria <[email protected]> • #92
Command 0000 was not immediately accepted, BLAH ticks??..
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:11:27 -0700
"G-man" <[email protected]> • #91
Re: Unresolved symbols, pci-scan.c/eepro100.c and 2.2.19-6.2.16enterprise redhat 6.2
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:38:41 -0700
"G-man" <[email protected]> • #90
Re: Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 13:50:45 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #89
Re: Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 18:54:03 +0200
John Sved <[email protected]> • #88
RE: Re: Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 9:40:52
Robbie Dinn <[email protected]> • #87
Re: Unresolved symbols, pci-scan.c/eepro100.c and 2.2.19-6.2.16enterprise redhat 6.2
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 09:58:40 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #86
Re: Unresolved symbols, pci-scan.c/eepro100.c and 2.2.19-6.2.16enterprise redhat 6.2
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:33:36 -0700
"G-man" <[email protected]> • #85
Re: Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 21:28:59 +0200
John Sved <[email protected]> • #84
Re: Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:43:08 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #83
Re: RedHat-6.2 and (IBM) Dual Port Server Adapter.
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 16:49:35 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #82
Re: RedHat-6.2 and (IBM) Dual Port Server Adapter.
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 11:07:15 -0700
Nate Amsden <[email protected]> • #81
RedHat-6.2 and (IBM) Dual Port Server Adapter.
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:22:13 -0700
Bill Schoolcraft <[email protected]> • #80
Re: Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 20:08:51 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #79
Re: Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:43:02 +0200
John Sved <[email protected]> • #78
Re: Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:08:56 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #77
Twin laptops - one good NIC configuration - one bad
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:16:17 +0200
John Sved <[email protected]> • #76
Re: should i be worried about my eepro cards
17 Jun 2002 09:16:08 +0200
Joe Radinger <[email protected]> • #75
Short technical discussion about "No (RX) resources"
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 11:11:16 +0200
Christoph Plattner <[email protected]> • #74
82559ER eeprom
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:52:30 -0700
"Afzal, Naeem M" <[email protected]> • #73
Re: Unresolved symbols, pci-scan.c/eepro100.c and 2.2.19-6.2.16enterprise redhat 6.2
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 18:43:20 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #72
Re: FIXED - Unresolved symbols, pci-scan.c/eepro100.c and 2.2.19-6.2.16enterprise redhat 6.2
Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:37:25 -0700
"G-man" <[email protected]> • #71
Urgent and confidential.
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 20:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
so so <[email protected]> • #70
Unresolved symbols, pci-scan.c/eepro100.c and 2.2.19-6.2.16enterprise redhat 6.2
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:38:04 -0700
"G-man" <[email protected]> • #69
Re: should i be worried about my eepro cards
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:17:19 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #68
should i be worried about my eepro cards
13 Jun 2002 11:55:36 +0200
Joe Radinger <[email protected]> • #67
Re: Unresolved symbols, pci-scan.c and 2.2.14-5.0smp
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:55:16 +0300
"Sami Pitko" <[email protected]> • #66
Re: Unresolved symbols, pci-scan.c and 2.2.14-5.0smp
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 17:16:19 -0400 (EDT)
Donald Becker <[email protected]> • #65
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.