gmane.linux.rpm.yum archive

3458 archived articles, newest first (page 12 of 35). Latest articles →

Re: possible bug: yum and rhn-plugin interaction
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:35:04 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13469
possible bug(2): repomanage: AttributeError: RpmUtilsError instance has no attribute 'message'
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:45:44 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #13468
possible bug: yum and rhn-plugin interaction
Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:37:52 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #13467
yum update failing for delta rpms
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:06:56 -0500
Mike McIntyre <[email protected]> • #13466
Re: yum update failing for delta rpms
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:32:05 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13465
yum update failing for delta rpms
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:13:48 -0500
Mike McIntyre <[email protected]> • #13464
Re: yum update failing for delta rpms
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:47:25 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13463
yum update failing for delta rpms
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:29:07 -0500
Mike McIntyre <[email protected]> • #13462
Re: Caching remote data for multiple computers
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:25:41 +0100
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]> • #13461
Re: Caching remote data for multiple computers
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:41:15 +0100
Pierre Guillet <[email protected]> • #13460
Re: Caching remote data for multiple computers
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:15:48 +0100
Pierre Guillet <[email protected]> • #13459
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:17:23 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13458
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:11:57 +0000
Gerhardus Geldenhuis <[email protected]> • #13457
Re: Caching remote data for multiple computers
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:47:55 -0600
Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #13456
Re: Caching remote data for multiple computers
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:55:31 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13455
Caching remote data for multiple computers
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:35:19 +0100
Pierre Guillet <[email protected]> • #13454
Re: Direct RPM install?
Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:22:43 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #13453
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:04:42 +0000
Gerhardus Geldenhuis <[email protected]> • #13452
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:46:06 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13451
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:43:13 +0000
Gerhardus Geldenhuis <[email protected]> • #13450
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:47:50 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13449
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:38:03 +0000
Gerhardus Geldenhuis <[email protected]> • #13448
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:57:55 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13447
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:37:56 +0000
Gerhardus Geldenhuis <[email protected]> • #13446
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:33:22 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13445
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:55:41 +0000
Gerhardus Geldenhuis <[email protected]> • #13444
Re: Documentation Questions and Updates
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:38:06 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13443
Documentation Questions and Updates
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:57:09 +0000
Gerhardus Geldenhuis <[email protected]> • #13442
Re: basearch, bestarch, exactarch, repo setup questions
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:38:38 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13441
Re: basearch, bestarch, exactarch, repo setup questions
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:30:38 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13440
basearch, bestarch, exactarch, repo setup questions
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:23:32 -0500
John Dennis <[email protected]> • #13439
Re: Direct RPM install?
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:57:49 -0500 (EST)
"Robert G. Brown" <[email protected]> • #13438
Re: Direct RPM install?
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:23:53 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13437
Direct RPM install?
Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:55:38 -0500 (EST)
"Robert G. Brown" <[email protected]> • #13436
Re: yum fails to install most up to date version
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:10:13 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13435
Re: yum fails to install most up to date version
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:36:45 +0100
Maria Alandes Pradillo <[email protected]> • #13434
Re: yum fails to install most up to date version
Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:52:48 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13433
Re: yum fails to install most up to date version
Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:53:34 +0100
Maria Alandes Pradillo <[email protected]> • #13432
Re: yum fails to install most up to date version
Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:52:38 +0100
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]> • #13431
Re: yum fails to install most up to date version
Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:19:37 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13430
Re: yum fails to install most up to date version
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 07:33:17 -0500
Jim Perrin <[email protected]> • #13429
yum fails to install most up to date version
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:09:08 +0100
Maria Alandes Pradillo <[email protected]> • #13428
Re: Is there something wrong with the update files?
Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:25:26 -0500
Brian Long <[email protected]> • #13427
Re: Is there something wrong with the update files?
Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:34:32 +0100
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]> • #13426
Is there something wrong with the update files?
Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:22:06 -0500
"Habig, Tom" <[email protected]> • #13425
Re: Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread
Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13424
Re: Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread
Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:41:39 -0600
Dennis Gilmore <[email protected]> • #13423
Re: Only 1 of multiple obsoletes mentioned in pre-transaction prompt
Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:16:34 +0000
Paul Howarth <[email protected]> • #13422
Re: Only 1 of multiple obsoletes mentioned in pre-transaction prompt
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:44:15 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13421
Only 1 of multiple obsoletes mentioned in pre-transaction prompt
Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:50:55 +0000
Paul Howarth <[email protected]> • #13420
Re: Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread
Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:56:34 +0100
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]> • #13419
Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13418
Update on "Yum install fails on Solaris, reports success" thread
Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:23:53 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13417
Re: Resolve dependencies while "yum downgrade" process
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:25:21 +0300
Alex <[email protected]> • #13416
Re: Resolve dependencies while "yum downgrade" process
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:28:11 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13415
Re: Resolve dependencies while "yum downgrade" process
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:41:38 +0300
devel anaconda <[email protected]> • #13414
Re: Resolve dependencies while "yum downgrade" process
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:00:53 +0000
Paul Howarth <[email protected]> • #13413
Resolve dependencies while "yum downgrade" process
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:27:30 +0300
devel anaconda <[email protected]> • #13412
Re: Plugin for yum to download packages in parts
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:59:19 +0530
pranjal pandit <[email protected]> • #13411
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:53:36 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13410
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:51:01 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13409
Re: Plugin for yum to download packages in parts
Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:24:41 -0500
Brian Long <[email protected]> • #13408
Re: Plugin for yum to download packages in parts
Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:04:44 +0530
Ashwini Dhiman <[email protected]> • #13407
Re: Plugin for yum to download packages in parts
Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:53:37 +0530
Ashwini Dhiman <[email protected]> • #13406
Re: Plugin for yum to download packages in parts
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:49:38 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13405
Re: Plugin for yum to download packages in parts
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:45:27 -0500
Konstantin Ryabitsev <[email protected]> • #13404
Re: Plugin for yum to download packages in parts
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:59:31 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13403
Plugin for yum to download packages in parts
Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:43:52 +0530
arpit Aggarwal <[email protected]> • #13402
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:20:38 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13401
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:42:17 +0100
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]> • #13400
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:25:20 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13399
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:37:10 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[email protected]> • #13398
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:15:52 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13397
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:37:16 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13396
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13395
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:52:06 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13394
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13393
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 12:04:09 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13392
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:57:46 +0100
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]> • #13391
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:38:54 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13390
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13389
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:04:39 -0500
Brian Long <[email protected]> • #13388
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 21:55:35 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13387
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13386
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:48:46 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13385
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13384
Re: YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:01:02 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13383
YUM install [package.rpm] fails on Solaris, reports success
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:42:08 -0800 (PST)
Joshua Burns <[email protected]> • #13382
Re: knetworkmanager-pptp
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:17 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13381
Re: cachedir ignored?
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:19:25 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13380
Re: cachedir ignored?
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:17:00 +0000
Paul Howarth <[email protected]> • #13379
knetworkmanager-pptp
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:21:51 -0500
Jeremy Mordkoff <[email protected]> • #13378
Re: cachedir ignored?
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:56:36 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13377
Re: cachedir ignored?
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:49:45 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13376
Re: cachedir ignored?
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:58:41 +0100
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]> • #13375
Re: cachedir ignored?
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:05:54 +0000
Paul Howarth <[email protected]> • #13374
Re: cachedir ignored?
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:45:46 -0500
James Antill <[email protected]> • #13373
cachedir ignored?
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:42:29 +0000
Paul Howarth <[email protected]> • #13372
Re: feedback wanted for two new yum-utils
Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:06:05 +0100
Tim Lauridsen <[email protected]> • #13371
Re: feedback wanted for two new yum-utils
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:02:47 -0500 (EST)
Seth Vidal <[email protected]> • #13370
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.