gmane.lisp.cclan.general archive

779 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 8). Latest articles →

Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:40:06 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #773
Re: [asdf-install-devel] Re: proposed asdf-install patch
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:55:59 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #772
Re: [asdf-install-devel] Re: proposed asdf-install patch
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:47:15 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #771
Re: proposed asdf-install patch
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:04:41 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #770
Re: proposed asdf-install patch
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:36:42 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #769
Re: proposed asdf-install patch
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:20:56 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #768
proposed asdf-install patch
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:50:06 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #767
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:41:21 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #766
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:31:53 -0600
"Robert P. Goldman" <[email protected]> • #765
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:21:54 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #764
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:47:40 +0200
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #763
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:26:42 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #762
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:58:34 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #761
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:02:56 +0200
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #760
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:15:58 -0600
"Robert P. Goldman" <[email protected]> • #759
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:34:30 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #758
I just committed the changes to asdf.textinfo
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:24:00 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #757
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:19:29 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #756
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:18:01 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #755
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:11:07 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #754
Re: Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:01:45 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #753
Could there be a way to disable LOAD-PREFERENCES?
Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:26:22 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #752
Re: ASDF & symlinks, not Windows
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:46:40 -0800
Kevin Layer <[email protected]> • #751
Re: ASDF, Windows, symlinks
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:45:30 -0500
Todd Sabin <[email protected]> • #750
Re: ASDF, Windows, symlinks
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:42:01 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #749
Re: ASDF & symlinks, not Windows
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:28:32 +0200
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #748
Re: ASDF & symlinks, not Windows
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:54:26 -0800
Kevin Layer <[email protected]> • #747
Re: ASDF, Windows, symlinks
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:49:33 -0800
Kevin Layer <[email protected]> • #746
Re: ASDF, Windows, symlinks
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 06:48:28 -0800
Kevin Layer <[email protected]> • #745
Re: ASDF, Windows, symlinks
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:31:10 +0000
Daniel Barlow <[email protected]> • #744
ASDF & symlinks, not Windows
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:47:03 +0200
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #743
Re: ASDF, Windows, symlinks
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:35:41 -0500
Richard M Kreuter <[email protected]> • #742
Re: ASDF, Windows, symlinks
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:14:45 -0800
Kevin Layer <[email protected]> • #741
ASDF, Windows, symlinks
Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:24:11 +0200
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[email protected]> • #740
patch for ASDF documentation regarding dependencies and versions
Tue, 5 Feb 2008 09:14:56 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #739
Re: ASDF test-op
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:01:50 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #738
Re: ASDF test-op
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:48:21 -0500
Todd Sabin <[email protected]> • #737
Re: ASDF test-op
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:25:42 -0500
Todd Sabin <[email protected]> • #736
Re: ASDF test-op
Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:28:55 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #735
Re: ASDF test-op
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:54:42 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #734
Re: ASDF test-op
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:04:37 -0500
Todd Sabin <[email protected]> • #733
Re: [PATCH] have OPERATION-DONE-P return NIL for TEST-OP by default
Wed, 2 Jan 2008 14:05:38 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #732
Re: ASDF test-op
Wed, 02 Jan 2008 08:08:46 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #731
Re: [PATCH] have OPERATION-DONE-P return NIL for TEST-OP by default
Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:56:52 -0600
"Robert P. Goldman" <[email protected]> • #730
Re: [PATCH] have OPERATION-DONE-P return NIL for TEST-OP by default
Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:23:24 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #729
Re: ASDF test-op
Tue, 1 Jan 2008 10:28:20 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #728
ASDF test-op
Wed, 26 Dec 2007 20:16:32 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #727
Re: [PATCH] avoid compiler notes about unreachable code
Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:10:38 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #726
Re: [PATCH] have OPERATION-DONE-P return NIL for TEST-OP by default
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:50:15 +0000
Luis Oliveira <[email protected]> • #725
Re: [PATCH] have OPERATION-DONE-P return NIL for TEST-OP by default
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:27:31 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #724
Re: [PATCH] avoid compiler notes about unreachable code
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:24:04 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #723
[PATCH] have OPERATION-DONE-P return NIL for TEST-OP by default
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:48:39 +0000
Luis Oliveira <[email protected]> • #722
[PATCH] avoid compiler notes about unreachable code
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:06:26 +0000
Luis Oliveira <[email protected]> • #721
Re: [Sbcl-devel] [PATCH] ASDF: .fasl and .lisp in sync when mtime is equal
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:07:59 +0100
Andreas Fuchs <[email protected]> • #720
Re: [asdf-install-devel] Patches, Darcs, 'n' stuff
Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:06:28 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #719
Re: Suggestion for ASDF:TEST-OP
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:02:11 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #718
Re: Suggestion for ASDF:TEST-OP
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:23:42 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #717
Re: Suggestion for ASDF:TEST-OP
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:00:21 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #716
Suggestion for ASDF:TEST-OP
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:56:42 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #715
Re: operating on multiple systems
Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:33:01 -0500
Todd Sabin <[email protected]> • #714
Re: operating on multiple systems
Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:04:54 -0600
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #713
Re: [PATCH] asdf-install: set external-format for openmcl
Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:54:15 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #712
Re: operating on multiple systems
Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:08:52 -0500
C Y <[email protected]> • #711
operating on multiple systems
Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:19:44 -0500
Gary King <[email protected]> • #710
Re: PATCH Error message for broken asd file links
Sun, 7 Oct 2007 11:39:28 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #709
PATCH Error message for broken asd file links
Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:37:51 +0200
Andreas Fuchs <[email protected]> • #708
Re: [Cclan-commits] CVS: asdf asdf.lisp,1.109,1.110
Sat, 29 Sep 2007 21:42:32 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #707
Re: [Cclan-commits] CVS: asdf asdf.lisp,1.109,1.110
Sat, 29 Sep 2007 10:09:34 +0100
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> • #706
Re: [Cclan-commits] CVS: asdf asdf.lisp,1.109,1.110
Fri, 28 Sep 2007 19:21:32 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #705
Re: [Cclan-commits] CVS: asdf asdf.lisp,1.109,1.110
Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:58:57 +0100
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> • #704
Re: How do I do something after loading a module?
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:58:40 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #703
Re: How do I do something after loading a module?
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:36:05 -0700
"Sunil Mishra" <[email protected]> • #702
How do I do something after loading a module?
Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:13:00 -0700
"Sunil Mishra" <[email protected]> • #701
Re: ASDF-INSTALL and gpg
Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:40:56 -0500
"Robert P. Goldman" <[email protected]> • #700
Re: ASDF-INSTALL and gpg
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
GP lisper <[email protected]> • #699
Re: ASDF-INSTALL and gpg
Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:33:12 -0500
"Robert P. Goldman" <[email protected]> • #698
Re: (no subject)
Tue, 4 Sep 2007 13:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
GP lisper <[email protected]> • #697
Re: (no subject)
Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:40:00 -0600
"Robert P. Goldman" <[email protected]> • #696
Re: (no subject)
Sun, 2 Sep 2007 11:24:27 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #695
Re: (no subject)
Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
GP lisper <[email protected]> • #694
(no subject)
Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:12:14 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #693
Re: [PATCH] nicer arglist for ADSF:OOS
Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:02:22 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #692
Re: [PATCH] nicer arglist for ADSF:OOS
Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:54:07 -0500
"Robert P. Goldman" <[email protected]> • #691
Re: [PATCH] nicer arglist for ADSF:OOS
Thu, 30 Aug 2007 10:32:02 -0400
Zach Beane <[email protected]> • #690
Re: [PATCH] nicer arglist for ADSF:OOS
Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:47:17 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #689
Re: [PATCH] nicer arglist for ADSF:OOS
Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:45:14 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #688
Re: [PATCH] nicer arglist for ADSF:OOS
Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:44:38 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #687
Re: [PATCH] nicer arglist for ADSF:OOS
Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:07:53 -0500
"Robert P. Goldman" <[email protected]> • #686
Re: [PATCH] nicer arglist for ADSF:OOS
Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:46:44 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #685
[PATCH] nicer arglist for ADSF:OOS
Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:21:05 +0200
"Tobias C. Rittweiler" <[email protected]> • #684
Re: [PATCH] add a RETRY restart to the MISSING-DEPENDENCY error
Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:34:39 +0100
Luis Oliveira <[email protected]> • #683
static files and serial systems
Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:02:30 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #682
Re: [cl-markdown-devel] (no subject)
Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:06:29 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #681
Re: :static-file trivial feature request
Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:22:34 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #680
:static-file trivial feature request
Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:09:18 +0000 (UTC)
Kilian Sprotte <[email protected]> • #679
Re: asdf and windows .lnk files
Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:16:50 -0000
"Pixel // pinterface" <[email protected]> • #678
Re: asdf and windows .lnk files
Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:50:27 -0400
Gary King <[email protected]> • #677
Re: asdf and windows .lnk files
Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:48:12 -0500
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> • #676
asdf and windows .lnk files
Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:47:24 +0100
Christophe Rhodes <[email protected]> • #675
Re: ASDF depends-on / do-first
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 14:57:45 +0100
dan <[email protected]> • #674
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.