gmane.network.end2end archive
383 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →
Re: Once again buffer bloat and CC. Re: A Cute Story. Or: How to talk completely at cross purposes. Re: [ih] When was Go Back N adopted by TCP
Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:13:21 -0700CFP - IEEE Sixteenth International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WowMoM 2015)
Tue, 5 Aug 2014 18:07:54 -0500Once again buffer bloat and CC. Re: A Cute Story. Or: How to talk completely at cross purposes. Re: [ih] When was Go Back N adopted by TCP
Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:02:18 +0200a remark
Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:10:50 +0200DEADLINE EXTENDED TO JULY 11 - IEEE ICPADS, TAIWAN, 2014
Thu, 3 Jul 2014 16:03:18 +0800CFP: HotNets 2014 (conference: Oct 27-28, 2014, abstracts: July 9, 2014)
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:58:28 -0700Bufferbloat
Wed, 04 Jun 2014 16:11:50 +0200Re: A Cute Story. Or: How to talk completely at cross purposes. Re: [ih] When was Go Back N adopted by TCP
Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:58:03 +0200Re: A Cute Story. Or: How to talk completely at cross purposes. Re: [ih] When was Go Back N adopted by TCP
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 09:59:52 +0100or in other words:
Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:56:44 +0200Re: [e2e] A Cute Story. Or: How to talk completely at cross purposes. Re: When was Go Back N adopted by TCP
Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:44:56 +0200Re: A Cute Story. Or: How to talk completely at cross purposes. Re: [ih] When was Go Back N adopted by TCP
Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:01:27 +1000A Cute Story. Or: How to talk completely at cross purposes. Re: [ih] When was Go Back N adopted by TCP
Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:43:51 +0200IEEE LANMAN Call for Participation
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:08:59 -0500Call for Papers: ExtremeCom 2014 - The Gal ápagos Expedition (due in 2 weeks)
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 20:43:02 -0700Re: A not-end-to-end question
Sat, 29 Mar 2014 09:55:45 +0100Re: A not-end-to-end question
Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:16 +0000A not-end-to-end question
Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:32:36 -0700[ACM IMC 2014] Call for Papers (Due: April 30, 2014)
Sun, 16 Mar 2014 22:52:16 -0700 (PDT)Re: Just as an idea. Why can't we use hop by hop flow control for TCP?
Tue, 11 Mar 2014 21:04:56 +0100a note about posts
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:34:23 -0700Deadline April 1 CFP – 2014 IEEE Globecom Green Track
Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:43:13 -0700 (PDT)To make my thought more clear.
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 02:48:47 +0100Re: Just as an idea. Why can't we use hop by hop flow control for TCP?
Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:58:08 +0100Re: Just as an idea. Why can't we use hop by hop flow control for TCP?
Sun, 02 Mar 2014 21:53:09 +0100Just as an idea. Why can't we use hop by hop flow control for TCP?
Sun, 02 Mar 2014 14:52:28 +0100Re: A note on entropy Re: Are our models correct? Re: Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 22 Feb 2014 00:13:10 +0100Re: A note on entropy Re: Are our models correct? Re: Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:01:56 +1100A note on entropy Re: Are our models correct? Re: Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:22:34 +0100Re: Are our models correct? Re: Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 20:05:40 +0100Re: Are our models correct? Re: Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 22 Feb 2014 04:10:56 +1100Are our models correct? Re: Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:17:14 +0100Re: Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:07:10 +0100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:26:16 +0100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:54:33 +1100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:46:57 +0000Re: Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:55:23 +0100Re: Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:56:27 +0100Just a very quick remark on system theory Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:36:30 +0100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:54:12 +1100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 20:39:44 +0100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 16:54:31 +0100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:16:58 +0100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 03:15:10 +0100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:22:02 -0300Re: Archives was Fwd: Re: Historical question: Link layer flow control / silent discard
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:38:15 -0800Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 20:45:49 +0100Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:18:10 -0200Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:13:52 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:44:45 -0800Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:40:00 -0200Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 01:35:29 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:53:09 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:26:46 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:26:45 +0100Re: Archives was Fwd: Re: Historical question: Link layer flow control / silent discard
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:51:50 -0800Re: Archives was Fwd: Re: Historical question: Link layer flow control / silent discard
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:52:37 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:46:14 +0100Re: Archives was Fwd: Re: Historical question: Link layer flow control / silent discard
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:42:37 -0800Re: Archives was Fwd: Re: Historical question: Link layer flow control / silent discard
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:10:31 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:03:34 -0500 (EST)Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:18:23 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:56:01 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:29:02 -0500Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:44:50 -0800CFP: IEEE Workshop on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN)
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:51:08 -0600Re: Fwd: Re: Historical question: Link layer flow control / silent discard
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:05:44 -0800Re: Archives was Fwd: Re: Historical question: Link layer flow control / silent discard
Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:24:00 +0000Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:20:36 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:05:08 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:40:18 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:59:08 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:11:55 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:25:54 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:49:40 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:24:12 -0800Fwd: Re: Historical question: Link layer flow control / silent discard
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:50:55 -0500Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 18:47:00 +0000CFP: IEEE Micro Special Issue: High-Speed Data Center Interconnects
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:41:48 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:39:36 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:29:20 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:09:29 -0500 (EST)Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 07:10:35 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:56:58 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:17:00 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:41:15 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:24:40 +0000Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:09:46 +0000Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:57:13 +0000Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:53:13 +0000Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:17:19 +0000Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:11:57 -0500 (EST)Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:31:35 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 18:37:49 -0800Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:17:48 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:08:38 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:44:09 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:43:21 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:49:30 +0100Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:29:42 +0000
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.