gmane.network.end2end archive

385 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:51:36 +0000
"Matta, Abraham I" <[email protected]> • #7578
Re: Lost Layer?
Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:35:13 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7577
Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:52:36 -0500
Steven Blake <[email protected]> • #7576
Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 23:55:27 +0000
Jon Crowcroft <[email protected]> • #7575
Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:37:10 +0200
Ioannis Korovesis <[email protected]> • #7574
Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:25:27 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7573
Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:57:39 -0500
Steven Blake <[email protected]> • #7572
Yes, there IS a lost layer: The flow control layer, or "deadlock avoidance layer". Re: Lost Layer?
Mon, 13 Jan 2014 12:46:08 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7571
Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 11 Jan 2014 20:43:12 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7570
Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 11 Jan 2014 18:20:55 +0000
Jon Crowcroft <[email protected]> • #7569
Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:17:04 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7568
Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:40:55 +0000
Jon Crowcroft <[email protected]> • #7567
Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:39:02 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #7566
Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:50:42 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7565
Re: Lost Layer?
Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:40:52 +0000
Jon Crowcroft <[email protected]> • #7564
Re: end2end-interest Digest, Vol 117, Issue 2
Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:20:10 +0000
"Gary Berger (gaberger)" <[email protected]> • #7563
Lost Layer?
Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:34:14 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7562
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Thu, 2 Jan 2014 06:31:20 +0000
"Fred Baker (fred)" <[email protected]> • #7561
Re: What are the shared resources? Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 24 Dec 2013 15:24:08 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7560
Re: What are the shared resources? Re: Codel and Wireless
Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:02:24 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7559
Re: What are the shared resources? Re: Codel and Wireless
Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:08:29 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7558
Re: What are the shared resources? Re: Codel and Wireless
Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:30:00 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7557
Re: What are the shared resources? Re: Codel and Wireless
Sun, 22 Dec 2013 13:58:56 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7556
What are the shared resources? Re: Codel and Wireless
Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:04:25 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7555
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 13:56:56 -0500
Curtis Villamizar <[email protected]> • #7554
Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 17 Dec 2013 13:19:01 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7553
Re: Codel and Wireless
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:10:26 -0800
Richard Bennett <[email protected]> • #7552
Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:07:07 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7551
Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 17 Dec 2013 01:03:59 +0200 (EET)
Markku Kojo <[email protected]> • #7550
Re: [aqm] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:37:33 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7549
Re: [e2e] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:30:03 +0000
"Fred Baker (fred)" <[email protected]> • #7548
Re: [e2e] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:05:56 +0100
Naeem Khademi <[email protected]> • #7547
Re: [e2e] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:47:34 +0100
Naeem Khademi <[email protected]> • #7546
Re: [aqm] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:18:10 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7545
Re: [aqm] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:55:29 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7544
Re: [e2e] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:34:52 +0000
"Fred Baker (fred)" <[email protected]> • #7543
Re: [e2e] What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:57:39 +0000
Bob Briscoe <[email protected]> • #7542
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:03:09 +0100
Naeem Khademi <[email protected]> • #7541
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:42:12 +0000
"Fred Baker (fred)" <[email protected]> • #7540
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:41:42 +0100
Naeem Khademi <[email protected]> • #7539
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 21:59:59 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7538
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:54:45 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7537
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:29:15 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7536
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:47:54 +0100
Naeem Khademi <[email protected]> • #7535
Re: What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:37:56 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7534
What is a good burst? -- AQM evaluation guidelines
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 06:35:04 +0100
Naeem Khademi <[email protected]> • #7533
Re: Codel and Wireless
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:21:43 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7532
Re: Codel and Wireless
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 02:28:31 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7531
Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:11:49 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7530
Re: A "Railway Model." Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 23:40:28 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7529
Re: A "Railway Model." Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:28:46 +0000
Jon Crowcroft <[email protected]> • #7528
Re: A "Railway Model." Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:04:00 +0000
Jon Crowcroft <[email protected]> • #7527
Re: A "Railway Model." Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:17:10 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7526
Re: A "Railway Model." Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:08:26 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7525
Re: A "Railway Model." Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:36:14 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7524
Re: A "Railway Model." Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 7 Dec 2013 12:12:04 +0000
Neil Davies <[email protected]> • #7523
Re: A "Railway Model." Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 7 Dec 2013 22:11:57 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7522
A "Railway Model." Re: Codel and Wireless
Sat, 07 Dec 2013 01:03:46 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7521
Re: Codel and Wireless
Fri, 06 Dec 2013 15:17:17 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7520
Re: Codel and Wireless
Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:49:37 +0000
Jon Crowcroft <[email protected]> • #7519
Re: Codel and Wireless
Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:02:47 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7518
Re: Codel and Wireless
Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:23:41 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7517
Re: Codel and Wireless
Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:16:23 -0500
Keith Winstein <[email protected]> • #7516
Re: Codel and Wireless
Fri, 6 Dec 2013 10:22:33 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7515
Re: Codel and Wireless
Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:30:42 -0500
Hari Balakrishnan <[email protected]> • #7514
Re: Codel and Wireless
Thu, 05 Dec 2013 16:49:51 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7513
Re: Codel and Wireless
Thu, 05 Dec 2013 14:47:31 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7512
Re: Codel and Wireless
Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:11:55 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7511
Re: Codel and Wireless
Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:44:11 +0100
KUHN Nicolas <[email protected]> • #7510
Re: Codel and Wireless
Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:52:23 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7509
Re: Codel and Wireless
Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Daniel Havey <[email protected]> • #7508
Re: Codel and Wireless
Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:26:52 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7507
Re: Codel and Wireless
Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:40:23 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7506
Re: Codel and Wireless
Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:11:35 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7505
Re: Codel and Wireless
Wed, 04 Dec 2013 08:10:51 +0100
"LOCHIN Emmanuel" <[email protected]> • #7504
Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:29:57 -0800 (PST)
Daniel Havey <[email protected]> • #7503
Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:02:14 -0500
Anirudh Sivaraman <[email protected]> • #7502
Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 3 Dec 2013 17:34:40 -0800 (PST)
Daniel Havey <[email protected]> • #7501
Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:54:15 -0500
Keith Winstein <[email protected]> • #7500
Re: Codel and Wireless
Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:45:58 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7499
Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 3 Dec 2013 15:10:41 -0800 (PST)
Daniel Havey <[email protected]> • #7498
Re: Codel and Wireless
Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:41:29 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7497
Re: Codel and Wireless
Tue, 3 Dec 2013 13:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Daniel Havey <[email protected]> • #7496
Codel and Wireless
Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:11:55 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7495
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Mon, 2 Dec 2013 08:16:08 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7494
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:23:17 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7493
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Sun, 01 Dec 2013 16:57:28 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7492
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Sun, 1 Dec 2013 16:05:12 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7491
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Fri, 29 Nov 2013 14:13:49 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7490
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:24:13 +1100
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> • #7489
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:05:06 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7488
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:17:01 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #7487
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:06:59 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7486
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:28:01 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #7485
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:50:28 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7484
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:54:33 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7483
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:36:53 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #7482
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:49:41 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7481
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:53:02 +0100
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> • #7480
Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:10:44 -0800
Richard Bennett <[email protected]> • #7479
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.