gmane.network.tux archive

978 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 10). Latest articles →

tux cuts large files short
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 18:28:44 +0200
"Alex Kramarov" <[email protected]> • #165
GREAT PDF !! (was AW: virtual hosts with apache ? )
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 19:22:25 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #164
AW: virtual hosts with apache ?
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 12:32:20 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #163
RE: virtual hosts with apache ?
Mon, 17 Jun 2002 09:56:53 +0200
"Angel Marin" <[email protected]> • #162
AW: listen to IP xyz
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 20:11:48 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #161
virtual hosts with apache ?
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 20:06:07 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #160
Re: listen to IP xyz
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 21:07:39 +0300
Alex Antropoff <[email protected]> • #159
listen to IP xyz
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:28:20 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #158
AW: TUX keeps forgetting virtual_host
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 18:25:11 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #157
Re: TUX keeps forgetting virtual_host
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 16:18:17 +0300
Alex Antropoff <[email protected]> • #156
TUX keeps forgetting virtual_host
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 14:30:28 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #155
tux freezing
13 Jun 2002 15:09:16 -0400
Nicholas Tang <[email protected]> • #154
TUX + PHP
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:14:08 +0900
Na Sang-ho <[email protected]> • #153
Tux development/List
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:17:14 -0500
William R Thomas <[email protected]> • #152
Re: TUX CGI module problems
Tue, 4 Jun 2002 21:19:20 +0300
Alex Antropoff <[email protected]> • #151
RE: TUX CGI module problems
Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:38:12 +0100
"Serge Sozonoff" <[email protected]> • #150
[BUG] in sendfile() under high load
Fri, 31 May 2002 18:53:18 +0200
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[email protected]> • #149
Re: Tux fsck up on high load
Fri, 31 May 2002 18:41:58 +0200
"Alex Kramarov" <[email protected]> • #148
RE: Tux and TCP
Fri, 31 May 2002 09:02:23 -0500
"Collins, Tom" <[email protected]> • #147
Tux fsck up on high load
Fri, 31 May 2002 15:38:52 +0200
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[email protected]> • #146
Re: white paper of some sort?
Wed, 29 May 2002 08:02:06 -0400
"Bill Rugolsky Jr." <[email protected]> • #145
Re: white paper of some sort?
Tue, 28 May 2002 22:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Andrew Ng <[email protected]> • #144
white paper of some sort?
Wed, 29 May 2002 02:31:59 +0200
Jon Åslund <[email protected]> • #143
Re: Machine freezes with Tux
Tue, 28 May 2002 13:05:41 -0500
William R Thomas <[email protected]> • #142
Machine freezes with Tux
Mon, 27 May 2002 11:32:38 +0530
"Anish Srivastava" <[email protected]> • #141
Re: Tux and TCP
Sat, 25 May 2002 04:18:36 +0100
João Paulo Ribeiro <[email protected]> • #140
RE: Tux and TCP
Fri, 24 May 2002 16:21:48 -0500
"Collins, Tom" <[email protected]> • #139
virtual hosts not working ?
Fri, 17 May 2002 13:21:14 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #138
RE: TUX CGI module problems
Wed, 15 May 2002 14:25:41 +0100
"Serge Sozonoff" <[email protected]> • #137
TUX CGI module problems
Wed, 15 May 2002 14:05:08 +0100
"Serge Sozonoff" <[email protected]> • #136
TUX Hostheader to Apache ?
Wed, 15 May 2002 12:15:03 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #135
Feature Request
Tue, 14 May 2002 16:05:38 -0500
William R Thomas <[email protected]> • #134
RE: Tux and TCP
Mon, 13 May 2002 13:20:30 -0500
"Collins, Tom" <[email protected]> • #133
RE: Tux and TCP
Thu, 9 May 2002 11:21:46 -0500
"Collins, Tom" <[email protected]> • #132
Re: Missing /proc/sys/net/tux/serverport
Wed, 08 May 2002 17:47:25 -0400
Javier Gostling <[email protected]> • #131
Missing /proc/sys/net/tux/serverport
Wed, 08 May 2002 17:26:26 -0400
Javier Gostling <[email protected]> • #130
More on tux's userspace redirection.
Mon, 6 May 2002 23:33:10 -0400 (EDT)
Dormando <[email protected]> • #129
Re: AW: TUX won't start...
Mon, 06 May 2002 20:45:10 -0700
J Sloan <[email protected]> • #128
AW: TUX won't start...
Mon, 6 May 2002 17:52:19 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #127
Re:Re: TUX won't start...
Mon, 6 May 2002 13:46:33 +0200
"Jan-Hendrik Heuing" <[email protected]> • #126
about post method problem
Mon, 6 May 2002 18:5:2 +0800
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #125
Problem with redirecting (stack trace).
Sat, 4 May 2002 16:48:26 -0400 (EDT)
Dormando <[email protected]> • #124
Problem with redirecting.
Sat, 4 May 2002 14:54:04 -0400 (EDT)
Dormando <[email protected]> • #123
Re: Tux and TCP
Sat, 4 May 2002 15:03:13 +0100
[email protected] • #122
RE: Tux and PHP
Fri, 3 May 2002 13:39:12 +0100
"Serge Sozonoff" <[email protected]> • #121
Tux and PHP
Fri, 3 May 2002 11:23:47 +0100
"Serge Sozonoff" <[email protected]> • #120
RE: Tux and TCP
Thu, 2 May 2002 08:06:40 -0500
"Collins, Tom" <[email protected]> • #119
Re: Tux and TCP
Thu, 2 May 2002 12:14:15 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #118
Tux and TCP
Thu, 2 May 2002 06:57:45 -0500
"Collins, Tom" <[email protected]> • #117
TUX_ACTION_GET_OBJECT and TUX_ACTION_READ_OBJECT
Wed, 1 May 2002 10:50:18 -0400 (EDT)
Dormando <[email protected]> • #116
Virtual Hosting
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:51:11 -0400
Andrés Lara <[email protected]> • #115
help
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:41:17 -0400
Andrés Lara <[email protected]> • #114
Re: Tux and HTTP request forwarding
29 Apr 2002 09:11:51 +1000
Bojan Smojver <[email protected]> • #113
Re: tux performance on Linux 2.4.17
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:44:57 +0200 (CEST)
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[email protected]> • #112
Re: Tux and HTTP request forwarding
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 10:34:29 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #111
Re: tux performance on Linux 2.4.17
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 10:33:37 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #110
Re: tux performance on Linux 2.4.17
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 01:32:11 +0200
"Alex Kramarov" <[email protected]> • #109
tux performance on Linux 2.4.17
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 18:09:05 -0400
Yaoping Ruan <[email protected]> • #108
Re: Tux and HTTP request forwarding
26 Apr 2002 09:25:54 +1000
Bojan Smojver <[email protected]> • #107
RE: Tux and HTTP request forwarding
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:56:01 +0100
"Serge Sozonoff" <[email protected]> • #106
Re: Tux and HTTP request forwarding
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 18:23:37 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #105
Tux and HTTP request forwarding
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:19:22 +0100
"Serge Sozonoff" <[email protected]> • #104
Re: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:42:44 +0200 (CEST)
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[email protected]> • #103
Re: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:30:54 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #102
Re: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:23:54 +0200 (CEST)
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[email protected]> • #101
Re: Tux and Symbolic links.
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:53:15 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #100
Tux and Symbolic links.
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:35:12 +0100
"Serge Sozonoff" <[email protected]> • #99
Re: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:42:48 -0500
Joe Cooper <[email protected]> • #98
RE: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:39:01 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #97
RE: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 20:33:47 +0200
"Alex Kramarov" <[email protected]> • #96
RE: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:03:27 -0700
Liang Yang <[email protected]> • #95
RE: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:44:00 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #94
RE: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:43:23 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #93
RE: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:37:44 -0700
Liang Yang <[email protected]> • #92
RE: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:12:23 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #91
RE: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:11:41 -0700
Liang Yang <[email protected]> • #90
Re: doubt about 99% of the cases if the first byte of the file is cached.
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:17:58 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #89
Re: What's max_object_size for?
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:12:25 +0200 (CEST)
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> • #88
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.