gmane.os.freebsd.performance archive

501 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 6). Latest articles →

Re: Scaling and performance issues with FreeBSD 9 (& 10) on 4 socket systems
Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:50:22 +0200
Remy Nonnenmacher <[email protected]> • #4012
Re: Scaling and performance issues with FreeBSD 9 (& 10) on 4 socket systems
Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:05:44 +0800
David Xu <[email protected]> • #4011
Re: Scaling and performance issues with FreeBSD 9 (& 10) on 4 socket systems
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:36:24 -0500
"Mark Felder" <[email protected]> • #4010
Re: Scaling and performance issues with FreeBSD 9 (& 10) on 4 socket systems
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:31:19 -0700
"David O'Brien" <[email protected]> • #4009
Re: Scaling and performance issues with FreeBSD 9 (& 10) on 4 socket systems
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:01:27 +0200
Remy Nonnenmacher <[email protected]> • #4008
Re: Scaling and performance issues with FreeBSD 9 (& 10) on 4 socket systems
Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:32:41 -0500
"Mark Felder" <[email protected]> • #4007
Scaling and performance issues with FreeBSD 9 (& 10) on 4 socket systems
Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:58:49 -0700
"David O'Brien" <[email protected]> • #4006
NUMA awareness
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:48:07 +0000
Meny Yossefi <[email protected]> • #4005
Re: New Phoronix performance benchmarks between some Linuxes and *BSDs
Tue, 28 May 2013 17:04:46 +0200
dennis berger <[email protected]> • #4004
Re: New Phoronix performance benchmarks between some Linuxes and *BSDs
Tue, 28 May 2013 16:27:58 +0200
dennis berger <[email protected]> • #4003
Re: New Phoronix performance benchmarks between some Linuxes and *BSDs
Tue, 28 May 2013 06:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Pathiakis <[email protected]> • #4002
Re: New Phoronix performance benchmarks between some Linuxes and *BSDs
Tue, 28 May 2013 07:12:50 -0500
"Mark Felder" <[email protected]> • #4001
Re: New Phoronix performance benchmarks between some Linuxes and *BSDs
Tue, 28 May 2013 14:48:12 +0300
Volodymyr Kostyrko <[email protected]> • #4000
Re: New Phoronix performance benchmarks between some Linuxes and *BSDs
Tue, 28 May 2013 02:03:45 -0700
Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> • #3999
New Phoronix performance benchmarks between some Linuxes and *BSDs
Tue, 28 May 2013 09:08:22 +0200
"O. Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #3998
Re: irq balancer
Mon, 13 May 2013 19:16:12 -0700
Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> • #3997
Re: irq balancer
Mon, 13 May 2013 11:10:44 -0500
Eric van Gyzen <[email protected]> • #3996
irq balancer
Mon, 13 May 2013 08:43:19 +0000
Meny Yossefi <[email protected]> • #3995
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:55:10 +0800
Jia-Shiun Li <[email protected]> • #3994
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:29:31 +0200
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3993
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:20:47 +0800
Jia-Shiun Li <[email protected]> • #3992
Re: End of test sessions [Was Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 119, Issue 9]
Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:29:36 -0700
Carl Delsey <[email protected]> • #3991
End of test sessions [Was Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 119, Issue 9]
Sun, 31 Mar 2013 23:52:03 +0200
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3990
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8]
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:20:26 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3989
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8]
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:11:16 -0700
Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> • #3988
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8]
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:45:58 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3987
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8]
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:00:14 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3986
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:55:45 +0100
Daniel Bilik <[email protected]> • #3985
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:48:21 -0700
Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> • #3984
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:45:58 -0500
Adam Vande More <[email protected]> • #3983
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:51:15 -0700
Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> • #3982
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:09:53 -0500
Adam Vande More <[email protected]> • #3981
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:01:05 -0500
Adam Vande More <[email protected]> • #3980
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Pathiakis <[email protected]> • #3979
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:33:51 -0700
Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> • #3978
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:11:41 -0400
Bill Totman <[email protected]> • #3977
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:36:48 +0100
Daniel Bilik <[email protected]> • #3976
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:38:02 +0100
Daniel Bilik <[email protected]> • #3975
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:11:53 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3974
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:27:03 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3973
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:10:02 -0700
Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <[email protected]> • #3972
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:59:29 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3971
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:14:16 -0700
Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> • #3970
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:20:33 -0500
Adam Vande More <[email protected]> • #3969
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:08:33 -0700
Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> • #3968
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:34:06 +0100
Daniel Bilik <[email protected]> • #3967
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 08:44:31 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3966
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Pathiakis <[email protected]> • #3965
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:07:23 -0700
Periko Support <[email protected]> • #3964
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:15:08 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3963
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:56:09 +0400
Евгений Хоркин <[email protected]> • #3962
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:16:13 -0400
Mark Saad <[email protected]> • #3961
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:06:46 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3960
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:00:40 -0400
"Traffanstead, Mike" <[email protected]> • #3959
FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:03:27 +0100
Davide D'Amico <[email protected]> • #3958
Re: buffer cache usage
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:11:14 +1100 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[email protected]> • #3957
buffer cache usage
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:57:24 +0000
Richard Kearsley <[email protected]> • #3956
Surge 2013 CFP Open
Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:32:03 -0400
Katherine Jeschke <[email protected]> • #3955
Re: Phoronix comparision of Linux & FreeBSD kernel on Debian
Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:05:50 +0000
Marcus Reid <[email protected]> • #3954
Re: Phoronix comparision of Linux & FreeBSD kernel on Debian
Fri, 1 Mar 2013 08:07:51 +0000
Marcus Reid <[email protected]> • #3953
Re: PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore?
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:04:36 -0600
Mark Felder <[email protected]> • #3952
Re: PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore?
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:18:45 +0100
"O. Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #3951
Re: PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore?
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:18:43 +0000
David Chisnall <[email protected]> • #3950
Re: PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore?
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:09:47 GMT
Anton Shterenlikht <[email protected]> • #3949
PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore?
Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:09:49 +0100
"O. Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #3948
Devilator 1.1 including ZFS stats
Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:49:21 +0100
Borja Marcos <[email protected]> • #3947
Re: FreeBSD 9.1 and how to map the libraries form gcc47?
Mon, 31 Dec 2012 19:07:44 +0200
Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> • #3946
FreeBSD 9.1 and how to map the libraries form gcc47?
Mon, 31 Dec 2012 10:34:29 +0100
"Paul Maulberger" <[email protected]> • #3945
Re: FFS - Still using rotational delay with modern disks?
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:56:49 +0300
Sergey Kandaurov <[email protected]> • #3944
Re: FFS - Still using rotational delay with modern disks?
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:23:51 +1100
Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[email protected]> • #3943
FFS - Still using rotational delay with modern disks?
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:44:11 -0500
"Dieter BSD" <[email protected]> • #3942
Re: find vs ls performance for walking folders, are there any faster options?
Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:38:02 +0100
Olav Grønås Gjerde <[email protected]> • #3941
Phoronix comparision of Linux & FreeBSD kernel on Debian
Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:18:35 +0100
Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> • #3940
Re: find vs ls performance for walking folders, are there any faster options?
Thu, 13 Dec 2012 01:50:52 +1100 (EST)
Bruce Evans <[email protected]> • #3939
find vs ls performance for walking folders, are there any faster options?
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:19:58 +0100
Olav Grønås Gjerde <[email protected]> • #3938
FreeBSD NFS latency stats
Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:59:30 +0100
Victor Balada Diaz <[email protected]> • #3937
Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:12:02 +0200
Volodymyr Kostyrko <[email protected]> • #3936
Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:27:54 -0500
Mike Jakubik <[email protected]> • #3935
Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:19:32 +0100
"O. Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #3934
Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:56:42 +0100
Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> • #3933
Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:54:52 +0100
Erik Cederstrand <[email protected]> • #3932
Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:03:03 -0500
Mike Jakubik <[email protected]> • #3931
Jumbo Packet fail.
Sat, 17 Nov 2012 17:32:46 -0500
Zaphod Beeblebrox <[email protected]> • #3930
Re: Compressed RAM disk swap space
Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:37:46 +0100
Achim Patzner <[email protected]> • #3929
Compressed RAM disk swap space
Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:33:35 +0000
David <[email protected]> • #3928
Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:21:20 -0400
Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> • #3927
new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:10:27 +0200
Miroslav Lachman <[email protected]> • #3926
Re: Help. Porting "FreeOCL" fails (atomic_ops.h missing, CLANG++ libc++ issues ...)
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:08:18 -1000
Jan Beich <[email protected]> • #3925
Re: Help. Porting "FreeOCL" fails (atomic_ops.h missing, CLANG++ libc++ issues ...)
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:19:15 +0200
Dimitry Andric <[email protected]> • #3924
Re: Help. Porting "FreeOCL" fails (atomic_ops.h missing, CLANG++ libc++ issues ...)
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 20:28:38 +0200
"O. Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #3923
Re: Help. Porting "FreeOCL" fails (atomic_ops.h missing, CLANG++ libc++ issues ...)
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:04:29 +0200
"O. Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #3922
Re: Help. Porting "FreeOCL" fails (atomic_ops.h missing, CLANG++ libc++ issues ...)
Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:51:19 +0200
Dimitry Andric <[email protected]> • #3921
Help. Porting "FreeOCL" fails (atomic_ops.h missing, CLANG++ libc++ issues ...)
Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:45:49 +0200
"O. Hartmann" <[email protected]> • #3920
Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:47:29 -0700
Gezeala M. Bacuño II <[email protected]> • #3919
Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:07:40 -0500
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #3918
Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:23:05 -0700
Gezeala M. Bacuño II <[email protected]> • #3917
Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:02:53 -0500
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #3916
Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:09:15 -0700
Gezeala M. Bacuño II <[email protected]> • #3915
Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:24:48 -0500
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #3914
Re: vm.kmem_size_max and vm.kmem_size capped at 329853485875 (~307GB)
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:00:39 +0200
Ivan Voras <[email protected]> • #3913
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.