gmane.os.netbsd.devel.pkgsrc.wip.review archive

1307 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 14). Latest articles →

RE: Please review wip/umurmur
Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:17:45 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2300
Re: Please review wip/umurmur
Sat, 12 Jan 2013 18:45:03 -0600
Ken wong <[email protected]> • #2299
Re: Please review wip/umurmur
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:11:24 -0500
matthew sporleder <[email protected]> • #2298
Please review wip/umurmur
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:00:04 -0600
Ken wong <[email protected]> • #2297
Please, review heimdall and py-memcached
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:16:51 -0500
[email protected] • #2296
Re: please review (and import ?) logrotate 3.8.2
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:17:13 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2295
Re: please review (and import ?) logrotate 3.8.2
Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:44:59 +0100 (CET)
Nils Ratusznik <[email protected]> • #2294
Re: Please review a number of R libraries
Tue, 1 Jan 2013 03:02:59 +0200
"Mike M. Volokhov" <[email protected]> • #2293
Re: Please review vimprobable2
Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:59:33 +0100
Leonardo Taccari <[email protected]> • #2292
Re: Please review vimprobable2
Sun, 30 Dec 2012 00:54:08 -0500
Matthew Mondor <[email protected]> • #2291
Call to TI calculator owners: Please, review tilp2 and gfm
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:45:08 -0500
[email protected] • #2290
Re: Please, review tcl-tclOO and tcl85-itcl
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:13:51 -0500
[email protected] • #2289
Re: giant review request
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:06:13 -0500
[email protected] • #2288
Re: Please review vimprobable2
Sun, 30 Dec 2012 02:09:09 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2287
Please review vimprobable2
Sun, 30 Dec 2012 01:47:42 +0100
Leonardo Taccari <[email protected]> • #2286
Re: ham/tqsllib ham/trustedQSL
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:27:06 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #2285
Re: ham/tqsllib ham/trustedQSL
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:21:41 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2284
Re: giant review request
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:47:39 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2283
Re: giant review request
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:17:12 +1300
Mark Davies <[email protected]> • #2282
Re: Please, review tcl-tclOO and tcl85-itcl
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:29:57 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2281
Re: Please, review tcl-tclOO and tcl85-itcl
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:32:14 -0500
[email protected] • #2280
Re: Please, review gxmessage
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:24:21 -0500
[email protected] • #2279
Re: Please, review tktable
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:18:35 -0500
[email protected] • #2278
Re: Please, review py-jswebkit
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:10:11 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2277
Re: Please, review gxmessage
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:06:01 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2276
Re: Please, review qcomicbook
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:02:13 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2275
Re: Please, review gimp-high-pass-filter
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:59:47 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2274
Re: please review (and import ?) logrotate 3.8.2
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:52:40 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2273
Re: Please, review tktable
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:49:03 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2272
Re: Please, review tcl-tclOO and tcl85-itcl
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:47:31 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2271
Re: giant review request
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:43:49 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2270
Re: Please review wip/xombrero
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:39:29 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2269
Re: Please review a number of R libraries
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:03:53 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2268
Re: Please review wip/libctl
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:38:39 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2267
Re: Please review wip/labelnation
Thu, 27 Dec 2012 23:34:58 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2266
Please, review gxmessage
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 07:17:21 -0500
[email protected] • #2265
Reviewing and importing wip/deforaos-desktop
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 00:37:31 +0000 (UTC)
Pierre Pronchery <[email protected]> • #2264
Re: review wip/marathon-evil
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:48:33 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2263
Re: Please, review slocate
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:26:57 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2262
Re: please review wip/razor-qt
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:20:41 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2261
Re: review wip/marathon-evil
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:04:34 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2260
RE: review wip/marathon-evil
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:38:08 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2259
Re: review wip/marathon-evil
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:55:56 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #2258
Re: review wip/marathon-evil
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:36:26 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2257
Re: Please review some packages
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:22:53 +0100
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2256
Re: wip/libgeotiff ready for import?
Sun, 9 Dec 2012 15:53:47 -0500
[email protected] • #2255
wip/libgeotiff ready for import?
Sun, 09 Dec 2012 11:18:12 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #2254
Please, review slocate
Sun, 9 Dec 2012 09:07:53 -0500
[email protected] • #2253
RE: please review wip/polarssl
Fri, 7 Dec 2012 15:43:49 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2252
Re: please review wip/polarssl
Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:02:38 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #2251
please review wip/razor-qt
Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:59:24 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2250
RE: please review wip/polarssl
Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:55:16 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2249
RE: review wip/marathon-evil
Fri, 7 Dec 2012 14:53:27 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2248
Re: Please review wip/clipit
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 21:55:53 +0000 (UTC)
Pierre Pronchery <[email protected]> • #2247
Please review wip/clipit
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
Pierre Pronchery <[email protected]> • #2246
review wip/marathon-evil
Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:40:44 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2245
RE: please review wip/polarssl
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:30:07 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2244
Re: Please review wip/armadillo
Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:17:13 -0600
Jason bacon <[email protected]> • #2243
Re: please review wip/polarssl
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:32:13 +0100
Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> • #2242
Re: please review wip/polarssl
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:00:47 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #2241
RE: please review wip/polarssl
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:48:34 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2240
Re: please review wip/polarssl
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:48:02 -0500
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #2239
RE: please review wip/polarssl
Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:32:22 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2238
Re: Please review wip/armadillo
Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:44:13 -0500
[email protected] • #2237
Re: Please review wip/libctl
Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:39:47 -0600
Jason bacon <[email protected]> • #2236
Re: Please review wip/libctl
Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:48:24 -0500
[email protected] • #2235
Please review wip/libctl
Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:42:13 -0600
Jason bacon <[email protected]> • #2234
Please review wip/armadillo
Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:57:32 -0600
Jason bacon <[email protected]> • #2233
Re: wip/eclipse patch for openjdk; can it go to pkgsrc [ Was : devel/eclipse: JRE compatibility question; upgrade needed ]
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:37:12 +0530
Mayuresh <[email protected]> • #2232
Re: wip/eclipse patch for openjdk; can it go to pkgsrc [ Was : devel/eclipse: JRE compatibility question; upgrade needed ]
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 23:52:14 +0000
David Brownlee <[email protected]> • #2231
wip/eclipse patch for openjdk; can it go to pkgsrc [ Was : devel/eclipse: JRE compatibility question; upgrade needed ]
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:17:31 +0530
Mayuresh <[email protected]> • #2230
please review wip/polarssl
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 05:53:41 +0000
Tim Larson <[email protected]> • #2229
Please, review qcomicbook
Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:46:58 -0500
[email protected] • #2228
Please, review gimp-high-pass-filter
Sat, 3 Nov 2012 08:13:30 -0400
[email protected] • #2227
Re: ham/tqsllib ham/trustedQSL
Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:20:11 +0900
Makoto Fujiwara <[email protected]> • #2226
Re: Bug in wip/PulseAudio2.1
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:23:02 +0200
Tomas Bodzar <[email protected]> • #2225
Re: Bug in wip/PulseAudio2.1
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:17:55 +0200
Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> • #2224
Bug in wip/PulseAudio2.1
Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:54:41 +0200
Tomas Bodzar <[email protected]> • #2223
Re: Please, review tcl-tclOO and tcl85-itcl
Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:49:59 -0400
[email protected] • #2222
Re: Please review wip/fish
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:17:22 -0300
Silas Silva <[email protected]> • #2221
Please, review py-jswebkit
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:55:03 -0300
Silas Silva <[email protected]> • #2220
please review (and import ?) logrotate 3.8.2
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:15:11 +0200 (CEST)
Nils Ratusznik <[email protected]> • #2219
ham/tqsllib ham/trustedQSL
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:49:47 +0900
Makoto Fujiwara <[email protected]> • #2218
Please, review tktable
Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:06:32 -0400
[email protected] • #2217
Please review wip/labelnation
Thu, 4 Oct 2012 07:39:39 +0200
Mora Sylvain <[email protected]> • #2216
Re: Please review wip/labelnation
Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:24:47 -0400
[email protected] • #2215
Please, review tcl-tclOO and tcl85-itcl
Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:00:32 -0400
[email protected] • #2214
Re: Please review some packages
Thu, 4 Oct 2012 09:57:04 -0400
[email protected] • #2213
Re: Please review some packages
Thu, 4 Oct 2012 19:16:32 +0200
Moritz Wilhelmy <[email protected]> • #2212
Please review some packages
Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:13:38 +0200
Moritz Wilhelmy <[email protected]> • #2211
Re: pkgsrc/wip/autocutsel
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:24:09 -0500 (CDT)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #2210
Re: pkgsrc/wip/autocutsel
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:55:57 -0400
Greg Troxel <[email protected]> • #2209
pkgsrc/wip/autocutsel
Wed, 19 Sep 2012 02:25:06 +0900 (JST)
Ryo ONODERA <[email protected]> • #2208
giant review request
Sun, 9 Sep 2012 16:58:52 -0400
[email protected] • #2207
Re: Please review wip/xombrero
Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:38:24 -0400
Gary Duzan <[email protected]> • #2206
Re: Please review wip/xombrero
Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:56:52 +0200
Charles Rapenne <[email protected]> • #2205
Re: Please review wip/xombrero
Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:44:13 -0400
[email protected] • #2204
Re: Please review wip/xombrero
Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:12:57 +0200
Charles Rapenne <[email protected]> • #2203
Re: Please review wip/xombrero
Wed, 5 Sep 2012 17:10:53 +0200
Charles Rapenne <[email protected]> • #2202
Re: Please review wip/xombrero
Wed, 05 Sep 2012 10:37:41 -0400
Gary Duzan <[email protected]> • #2201
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.