gmane.comp.capabilities.general archive

390 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Tue, 5 Jan 2016 08:58:06 +0100
Lorens Kockum <[email protected]> • #14947
Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:40:13 -0800
Matt Rice <[email protected]> • #14946
Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:37:18 -0800
Alan Karp <[email protected]> • #14945
Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:34:36 -0800
Bill Frantz <[email protected]> • #14944
Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 20:29:59 -0800
Alan Karp <[email protected]> • #14943
Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:16:44 -0800
Chip Morningstar <[email protected]> • #14942
Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:05:30 -0800
Kenton Varda <[email protected]> • #14941
Re: Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:24:01 -0800
Bill Frantz <[email protected]> • #14940
Joins on capabilities that have passed through different membranes
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:53:48 -0800
Kenton Varda <[email protected]> • #14939
Re: fun with Capper and OFX financial transaction fetching
Mon, 4 Jan 2016 00:01:15 -0600
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #14938
fun with Capper and OFX financial transaction fetching
Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:39:38 -0600
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #14937
Deputies in Missouri statutes (may they never become confused)
Sat, 26 Dec 2015 18:54:02 -0600
David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14936
MattockFS (A strangely hybrid file-system)
Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:15:59 +0100
rmeijer <rmeijer-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #14935
Re: "Effect Capabilities for Haskell"
Sat, 12 Dec 2015 09:48:13 -0800
Matt Rice <[email protected]> • #14934
Re: [cap-talk] "Effect Capabilities for Haskell"
Sat, 12 Dec 2015 13:23:24 +0000
Thomas Leonard <[email protected]> • #14933
Re: "Effect Capabilities for Haskell"
Tue, 8 Dec 2015 21:19:08 -0800
Matt Rice <[email protected]> • #14932
"Effect Capabilities for Haskell"
Mon, 7 Dec 2015 20:12:20 -0800
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14931
Re: security vs. ux: never the twain shall meet
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 12:26:45 -0800
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14930
security vs. ux: never the twain shall meet
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 12:24:50 -0800
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14929
Re: [friam] Re: UX resources for object capabilities
Sat, 7 Nov 2015 11:32:32 -0700
Marc Stiegler <[email protected]> • #14928
Re: Cap'nProto RPC implementation questions
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:24:06 -0800
Kenton Varda <[email protected]> • #14927
Cap'nProto RPC implementation questions
Thu, 5 Nov 2015 14:37:15 +1100
William ML Leslie <[email protected]> • #14926
Re: [friam] Re: UX resources for object capabilities
Wed, 4 Nov 2015 18:25:40 -0700
Marc Stiegler <[email protected]> • #14925
Re: [friam] Re: UX resources for object capabilities
Tue, 3 Nov 2015 14:09:12 +1100
William ML Leslie <[email protected]> • #14924
Re: UX resources for object capabilities
Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:03:21 -0800
Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> • #14923
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:43:42 +0100
Tim Coote <[email protected]> • #14922
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Fri, 16 Oct 2015 01:33:33 +0100
Daira Hopwood <[email protected]> • #14921
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Thu, 15 Oct 2015 19:22:32 -0400
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #14920
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:55:05 +0200
Tom Van Cutsem <[email protected]> • #14919
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:21:36 -0700
Matt Rice <[email protected]> • #14918
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:46:11 -0400
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14917
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:32:52 -0700
Marc Stiegler <[email protected]> • #14916
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:26:43 -0700
Marc Stiegler <[email protected]> • #14915
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:51:24 -0700
Matt Rice <[email protected]> • #14914
Re: Android Marshmallow permissions model
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:31:25 -0500
David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14913
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:06:10 -0400
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #14912
Re: Android Marshmallow permissions model
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:23:10 -0700
Chip Morningstar <[email protected]> • #14911
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:28:27 -0700
Marc Stiegler <[email protected]> • #14910
Re: Android Marshmallow permissions model
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:56:41 -0500
David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14909
Re: Android Marshmallow permissions model
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:57:06 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14908
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:39:51 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14907
Re: Android Marshmallow permissions model
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:50:03 -0700
Marc Stiegler <[email protected]> • #14906
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:57:11 +0200
rmeijer <rmeijer-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #14905
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:14:45 -0700
Bill Frantz <[email protected]> • #14904
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:27:27 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14903
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:25:25 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14902
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:13:59 -0700
Bill Frantz <[email protected]> • #14901
Re: alive e/ken style projects?
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:00:00 -0700
Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> • #14900
alive e/ken style projects?
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:49:39 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14899
Android Marshmallow permissions model
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:39:20 -0500
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #14898
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:03:30 -0700
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #14897
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:50:24 +0100
Daira Hopwood <[email protected]> • #14896
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:49:20 +0100
Daira Hopwood <[email protected]> • #14895
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:12:16 +0200
rmeijer <rmeijer-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #14894
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Mon, 12 Oct 2015 20:06:10 +0200
Lorens Kockum <[email protected]> • #14893
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:07:58 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14892
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Mon, 12 Oct 2015 08:16:09 -0500
David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14891
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:42:59 +0100
Tim Coote <[email protected]> • #14890
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Sun, 11 Oct 2015 17:46:43 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14889
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Sun, 11 Oct 2015 17:44:21 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14888
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Sun, 11 Oct 2015 12:03:23 -0700
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14887
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Sun, 11 Oct 2015 13:49:48 -0500
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #14886
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:22:15 -0700
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14885
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Fri, 9 Oct 2015 05:52:33 -0700
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14884
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 23:00:02 -0500
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #14883
Re: Are memory safety and maximized data volatility mutually exclusive?
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:37:48 -0700
Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> • #14882
Re: Are memory safety and maximized data volatility mutually exclusive?
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 13:12:49 -0700
Bill Frantz <[email protected]> • #14881
Re: Are memory safety and maximized data volatility mutually exclusive?
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 13:01:29 -0700
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]> • #14880
Re: Are memory safety and maximized data volatility mutually exclusive?
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 13:02:27 -0700
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <[email protected]> • #14879
Re: Are memory safety and maximized data volatility mutually exclusive?
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:24:59 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14878
Re: Are memory safety and maximized data volatility mutually exclusive?
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:20:39 -0400
Scott Moore <[email protected]> • #14877
Re: [friam] SOSP History Day
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 07:22:08 -0700
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14876
Re: Are memory safety and maximized data volatility mutually exclusive?
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 21:58:05 +1100
Toby Murray <tobycmurray-gM/[email protected]> • #14875
Re: Are memory safety and maximized data volatility mutually exclusive?
Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:24:11 +0100
Sylvan Clebsch <[email protected]> • #14874
Are memory safety and maximized data volatility mutually exclusive?
Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:23:18 +0200
rmeijer <rmeijer-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #14873
Re: C++ becoming memory safe (sorta)
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:34:38 -0500
David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14872
Re: CFP: POST 2016
Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:19:11 +0200
rmeijer <rmeijer-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #14871
CFP: POST 2016
Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:33:43 -0700
Deian Stefan <[email protected]> • #14870
Re: C++ becoming memory safe (sorta)
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 13:01:21 -0500
Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> • #14869
Re: C++ becoming memory safe (sorta)
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 10:20:09 -0700
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14868
C++ becoming memory safe (sorta)
Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:57:37 +0200
rmeijer <rmeijer-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #14867
SSV 2015 - Deadline Extended to Oct 5th
Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:13:43 +1000
Toby Murray <tobycmurray-gM/[email protected]> • #14866
Re: Fwd: Re: [Cryptography] Encryption opinion
Tue, 22 Sep 2015 22:12:38 -0500
Dan Connolly <[email protected]> • #14865
Python port of RumpelTree++ (plus some demo tooling)
Sat, 19 Sep 2015 01:25:41 +0200
rmeijer <rmeijer-qWit8jRvyhVmR6Xm/[email protected]> • #14864
Fwd: [seL4 Announce] Second seL4 Devel opers Day, 8–9 Oct in Malibu
Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:43:06 -0700
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14863
Fwd: [seL4 Announce] seL4 Roadmap announced
Wed, 16 Sep 2015 07:41:52 -0700
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14862
Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:36:34 -0500
David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14861
Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:09:55 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14860
Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:01:34 -0400
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #14859
Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:48:35 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14858
Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:45:19 -0400
Mark Miller <[email protected]> • #14857
Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:40:29 -0700
Raoul Duke <[email protected]> • #14856
Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:09:06 +0100
Sylvan Clebsch <[email protected]> • #14855
Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:38:00 -0700
Yuvaraj Athur Raghuvir <[email protected]> • #14854
Re: imagining a programming language with a capability calling convention
Tue, 08 Sep 2015 20:42:53 +0200
Lluís <[email protected]> • #14853
Fwd: [seL4 Announce] So Long NICTA, Go DATA61!
Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:44:42 -0700
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14852
Attending - driving down? (was: Re: [friam] SOSP History Day )
Wed, 2 Sep 2015 00:54:07 -0700
Jed Donnelley <capability-iCFHVraI1K1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #14851
Re: [e-lang] SOSP History Day
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:30:19 -0400
[email protected] • #14850
Re: [e-lang] SOSP History Day
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:55:46 -0700
"Mark S. Miller" <[email protected]> • #14849
Re: [e-lang] SOSP History Day
Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:21:15 +0100
Tim Coote <[email protected]> • #14848
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.