gmane.comp.video.mplayer.g2.devel archive

Re: An open, standard video/audio API?

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:46:22 -0400

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #735

Re: An open, standard video/audio API?

Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:36:09 -0400

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #734

Re: An open, standard video/audio API?

Sun, 18 Apr 2004 01:30:13 +0200

Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> • #733

Re: An open, standard video/audio API?

Sun, 18 Apr 2004 01:03:42 +0200

Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> • #732

Re: An open, standard video/audio API?

Sun, 18 Apr 2004 02:58:12 +0400

Mikhail Ramendik <[email protected]> • #731

Re: An open, standard video/audio API?

Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:34:11 +0300 (EEST)

"Ivan Kalvachev" <[email protected]> • #730

Re: An open, standard video/audio API?

Sun, 18 Apr 2004 02:28:36 +0400

Mikhail Ramendik <[email protected]> • #729

Re: An open, standard video/audio API?

Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:11:40 +0200

Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> • #728

An open, standard video/audio API?

Sat, 17 Apr 2004 22:35:24 +0400

Mikhail Ramendik <[email protected]> • #727

Re: Yet another video API. :)

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:09:30 -0400

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #726

Re: Yet another video API. :)

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:25:08 -0400

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #725

Yet another video API. :)

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:22:16 +0300

"Andriy N. Gritsenko" <[email protected]> • #724

CVS: g2/stream http.c,1.1.1.1,1.2

Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:19:08 +0200 (CEST)

[email protected] (Michael Niedermayer CVS) • #723

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:29:16 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #722

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:46:46 +0100

Alex Beregszaszi <[email protected]> • #721

Re: dual licensing try 2

Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:44:04 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #720

Re: dual licensing try 2

Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:48:13 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #719

Re: dual licensing try 2

Fri, 05 Mar 2004 05:40:28 +0100

Diego Biurrun <[email protected]> • #718

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:36:30 +0200 (EET)

Fre_ax <[email protected]> • #717

Re: specifing visual for X11 window

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:06:06 +0100

Reimar Döffinger <[email protected]> • #716

Re: specifing visual for X11 window

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:49:54 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #715

specifing visual for X11 window

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:38:02 +0100

Reimar Döffinger <[email protected]> • #714

Re: dual licensing try 2

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:47:10 +0100

Alex Beregszaszi <[email protected]> • #713

Re: Legal issues: would companies really pay?

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:53:51 -0300 (ART)

Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[email protected]> • #712

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:20:14 +0000

xi <[email protected]> • #711

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:38:01 +0100 (CET)

florian dietrich <[email protected]> • #710

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:28:53 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #709

Re: Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:24:19 +0100

Balatoni Denes <[email protected]> • #708

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:05:32 +0100 (CET)

florian dietrich <[email protected]> • #707

Re: Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:35:02 +0100

Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> • #706

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:34:16 +0100

Alban Bedel <[email protected]> • #705

Re: Legal issues: would companies really pay?

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:17:12 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #704

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:07:42 +0100

Dirk <[email protected]> • #703

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:35:32 +0100

Jonas Jermann <[email protected]> • #702

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:26:28 +0800

Anders Johansson <[email protected]> • #701

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 01:32:49 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #700

Re: Legal issues: would companies really pay?

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 01:28:41 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #699

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:56:01 +0800

Anders Johansson <[email protected]> • #698

Legal issues: would companies really pay?

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 02:39:44 -0300 (ART)

Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[email protected]> • #697

Re: dual licensing try 2

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:57:00 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #696

Re: dual licensing try 2

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 00:37:31 -0300 (ART)

Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[email protected]> • #695

Re: dual licensing try 2

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:36:49 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #694

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:42:19 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #693

Re: dual licensing try 2

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:48:52 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #692

Re: dual licensing try 2

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:46:05 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #691

Re: dual licensing try 2

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:42:51 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #690

Re: dual licensing try 2

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:38:17 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #689

Re: dual licensing try 2

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:17:45 +0100

[email protected] • #688

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:26:02 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #687

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:23:09 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #686

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:21:12 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #685

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:53:38 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #684

Re: [PATCH] vo_x11_fullscreen check width and height

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:50:38 +0100

Reimar Döffinger <[email protected]> • #683

Re: [PATCH] vo_x11_fullscreen check width and height

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:45:07 +0100 (CET)

Arpi <[email protected]> • #682

[PATCH] vo_x11_fullscreen check width and height

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:38:03 +0100

Reimar Döffinger <[email protected]> • #681

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:34:54 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #680

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:34:26 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #679

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:26:56 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #678

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:11:28 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #677

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:57:13 +0100

[email protected] • #676

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:26:49 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #675

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:14:05 +0100

[email protected] • #674

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:19:42 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #673

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:11:27 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #672

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:22:39 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #671

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:18:01 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #670

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:46:31 +0100

[email protected] • #669

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:51:18 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #668

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:45:49 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #667

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:06:45 +0100

Attila Kinali <[email protected]> • #666

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:46:43 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #665

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:06:15 +0100

[email protected] • #664

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:06:57 -0600

Joey Parrish <[email protected]> • #663

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:20:19 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #662

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:16:59 +0100

Attila Kinali <[email protected]> • #661

Re: dual licensing

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:30:58 +0100

Gábor Lénárt <[email protected]> • #660

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:00:21 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #659

Re: dual licensing try 2

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:10:31 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #658

Re: dual licensing try 2

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 00:58:38 +0300

[email protected] (Dmitry Baryshkov) • #657

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:54:19 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #656

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:38:55 +0100

Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> • #655

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:15:45 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #654

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:14:28 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #653

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:08:10 +0100

Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> • #652

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:01:56 +0100

Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> • #651

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:21:10 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #650

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:13:10 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #649

Re: dual licensing try 2

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:28:58 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #648

Re: dual licensing try 2

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:08:47 +0100 (CET)

Arpi <[email protected]> • #647

Re: dual licensing try 2

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:59:03 -0600

Joey Parrish <[email protected]> • #646

Re: dual licensing try 2

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:52:35 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #645

dual licensing try 2

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 18:38:30 +0100 (CET)

Arpi <[email protected]> • #644

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 18:36:28 +0100

Michael Niedermayer <[email protected]> • #643

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:14:50 -0600

Joey Parrish <[email protected]> • #642

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:14:45 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #641

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:04:30 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #640

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:03:37 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #639

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:03:03 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #638

Re: CVS: g2/audio dec_audio.c,1.1.1.1,1.2

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:58:30 -0500

D Richard Felker III <[email protected]> • #637

Re: dual licensing

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:24:36 +0100

Gabucino <[email protected]> • #636