gmane.ietf.calendar archive

378 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Questions regarding recurrence rules
Tue, 31 May 2005 15:59:12 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer <[email protected]> • #10887
Status of Calconnect Recurrence Questionnaire results, and future questionnaires
Thu, 19 May 2005 11:05:06 -0700
Dave Thewlis <[email protected]> • #10886
Paranoider Deutschenmoerder kommt in Psychiatrie
Tue, 17 May 2005 18:21:23 GMT
[email protected] • #10885
Re: More recurrence rule clarifications sought
Wed, 11 May 2005 22:25:56 -0400
Sam Roberts <[email protected]> • #10884
RE: More recurrence rule clarifications sought
Thu, 5 May 2005 14:00:47 -0400
"Laird Nelson" <[email protected]> • #10883
Re: More recurrence rule clarifications sought
Thu, 5 May 2005 10:29:54 +0200
Reinhold Kainhofer <[email protected]> • #10882
More recurrence rule clarifications sought
Tue, 3 May 2005 15:28:13 -0400
"Laird Nelson" <[email protected]> • #10881
RE: Recurrence question regarding Februaries
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:42:20 -0400
"Laird Nelson" <[email protected]> • #10880
Re: Recurrence question regarding Februaries
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:58:32 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10879
Recurrence question regarding Februaries
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:56:34 -0400
"Laird Nelson" <[email protected]> • #10878
Further about the Calconnect Recurrence Questionnaire - status, thanks, and future developments
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:31:23 -0700
Dave Thewlis <[email protected]> • #10877
General Notification -- June Interop Tests and Roundtable III -- Calconnect: The Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:33:31 -0700
Dave Thewlis <[email protected]> • #10876
Document Action: 'Calendar Access Protocol (CAP)' to Experimental RFC
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:59:20 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10875
Calconnect Questionnaire on Recurrence - request responses by 11 April
Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:37:01 -0700
Dave Thewlis <[email protected]> • #10874
Re: dtend removed? (Re: draft-royer-ical-basic-01.txt - sent to IETF)
Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:17:05 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10873
Re: [Ietf-calsify] VALARM
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:32:28 -0500
Sam Roberts <[email protected]> • #10872
Re: Few Questions Reg Vcal/iCal
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:33:45 -0500
Sam Roberts <[email protected]> • #10871
dtend removed? (Re: draft-royer-ical-basic-01.txt - sent to IETF)
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 21:27:15 -0500
Sam Roberts <[email protected]> • #10870
Re: Where to use EXDATE
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:29:51 -0500
[email protected] • #10869
Re: Where to use EXDATE
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:30:35 -0500
[email protected] • #10868
Few Questions Reg Vcal/iCal
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:46:32 +0530 (IST)
Manoj Gangadhar Dixit <[email protected]> • #10867
Re: Where to use EXDATE
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:05:16 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10866
Re: Where to use EXDATE
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:59:50 -0800
"Carsten Guenther" <[email protected]> • #10865
Re: Where to use EXDATE
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:52:59 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10864
Where to use EXDATE
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:47:42 -0800
"Carsten Guenther" <[email protected]> • #10863
Re: CAP BoF at 62nd IETF?
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:05:36 -0800
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10862
CAP BoF at 62nd IETF?
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:47:47 -0800
"Leibowitz, Michael" <[email protected]> • #10861
Re: IANA Time Zone Registration
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:40:11 -0500
Jonathan Lennox <[email protected]> • #10860
Re: IANA Time Zone Registration
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:12:48 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10859
IANA Time Zone Registration
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 16:10:45 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10858
draft-royer-ical-basic-01.txt - sent to IETF
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 14:11:43 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10857
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-royer-ical-basic-00.txt]
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:06:01 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10856
Re: Re iCal-Basic - draft 00
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 21:12:08 -0500
[email protected] • #10855
[Fwd: Re: Re iCal-Basic - draft 00]
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:06:08 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10854
RE: Re iCal-Basic - draft 00
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:24:40 -0600
"Shannon Clark" <[email protected]> • #10853
Re iCal-Basic - draft 00
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:48:49 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #10852
Re iCal-Basic - draft 00
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 10:42:41 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10851
iCal-Basic - draft 00
Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:25:38 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10850
бухгалтерские услуги
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:34:54 +0300
"SERVICE" <[email protected]> • #10849
Новогодний и Рождество в Прибалтике
Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:43:01 +0300
"SERVICE" <[email protected]> • #10848
Call for Participantion -- Second Calconnect Interop - 11-12 January 2005 - Seattle, Washington
Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:48:00 -0800
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10847
Лучший справочник 2004 года
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:58:25 +0300
"WA2register" <[email protected]> • #10846
Re: Interop Results
Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:19:53 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10845
Interop Results
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:25:46 -0500
[email protected] • #10844
Re: rrule not allowed in vfreebusy?
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:33:21 +1000
Stuart Guthrie <[email protected]> • #10843
Re: VCAL 1.0 RRULE Spec?
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:53:24 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10842
VCAL 1.0 RRULE Spec?
Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:56:51 -0500
"Dan Hickman" <[email protected]> • #10841
rrule not allowed in vfreebusy?
Sun, 03 Oct 2004 15:14:21 -0700
"Mark D. Anderson" <[email protected]> • #10840
Re: question about calendar software
Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:16:12 -0500
Curt Ellmann <[email protected]> • #10839
question about calendar software
Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:09:25 -0700
"Web Team \(Cody Hinchliff\)" <[email protected]> • #10838
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-royer-calsch-xmltz-00.txt]
Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:59:49 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10837
WG Action: Conclusion of Calendaring and Scheduling (calsch)
Thu, 09 Sep 2004 13:39:04 -0400
The IESG <[email protected]> • #10836
DIFF to -13 of CAP
Tue, 07 Sep 2004 12:47:40 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10835
Plan to close the working group
Tue, 7 Sep 2004 11:55:42 -0700
Ted Hardie <[email protected]> • #10834
[Fwd: ABNF DIFF - pass 1]
Tue, 07 Sep 2004 12:12:27 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10833
test, please ignore
Tue, 7 Sep 2004 11:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10832
Re: [Ietf-calsify] possible VALARM solution?
Tue, 07 Sep 2004 11:44:42 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10831
Re: VALARM
Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:23:34 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10830
Re: [Ietf-calsify] VALARM
Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:46:03 -0400
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> • #10829
RE: [Ietf-calsify] VALARM
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:34:46 -0700
"Cameron Stillion" <[email protected]> • #10828
Re: [Ietf-calsify] VALARM
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 07:51:54 -0400
[email protected] • #10827
RE: draft-hare-xcalendar-01 has been posted
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 07:39:25 -0400
[email protected] • #10826
ABNF DIFF - pass 1
Sun, 22 Aug 2004 20:27:48 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10825
RE: draft-hare-xcalendar-01 has been posted
Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:06:30 -0700
"Cameron Stillion" <[email protected]> • #10824
draft-hare-xcalendar-01 has been posted
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:03:36 -0400
[email protected] • #10823
Re: Fwd: beep in calsch-cap-13.txt
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:05:13 -0400
David Blacka <[email protected]> • #10822
Re: Fwd: beep in calsch-cap-13.txt
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:33:57 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10821
New mailing lists
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:34:23 -0700
Lisa Dusseault <[email protected]> • #10820
Fwd: beep in calsch-cap-13.txt
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:54:57 -0700
Ted Hardie <[email protected]> • #10819
Re: CAP issue #657 (BEEP profile): closed?
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 18:06:11 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10817
Re: CAP issue #657 (BEEP profile): closed?
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 15:01:34 -0600
"Preston Stephenson" <[email protected]> • #10816
Re: CAP issue #657 (BEEP profile): closed?
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:33:14 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10815
Re: CAP issue #657 (BEEP profile): closed?
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 12:23:25 -0600
"Preston Stephenson" <[email protected]> • #10814
Re: CAP issue #657 (BEEP profile): closed?
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 11:46:09 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10813
re: CAP issue #657 (BEEP profile): closed?
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 10:32:54 -0600
"Preston Stephenson" <[email protected]> • #10812
Re: Item missing from Bob's list of unresolved items in Bugzilla...
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:31:44 -0400
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> • #10811
[Bug 657] CAP BEEP profile is missing
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:20:10 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] • #10810
calendaring BoF @ IETF, Thursday 1300-1500
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10809
Item missing from Bob's list of unresolved items in Bugzilla...
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 20:49:08 -0400
[email protected] • #10808
Jabber log from calsch IETF meeting
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:36:59 -0400
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> • #10807
CalDav rev 01 - for those that missed it.
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 16:38:18 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10806
Re: CAP issue #768: REQUEST-STATUS update
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 17:31:09 -0400
[email protected] • #10805
CAP issue #768: REQUEST-STATUS update
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 14:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10804
CAP issue #794: need ABNF ADDED
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10803
CAP issue #773: All uses of "FALSE" should be fully capitalized
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10802
CAP issue #758: REQUEST-STATUS syntax
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10801
CAP issue resolution
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10800
CAP issue #657 (BEEP profile): closed?
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10799
chatroom for calsch WG session at IETF 60
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10798
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:37:46 -0400
[email protected] • #10797
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:38:58 -0400
[email protected] • #10796
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:46:16 -0400
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> • #10795
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10794
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:19:06 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10793
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Sat, 31 Jul 2004 04:07:31 -0400
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> • #10792
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:08:18 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10791
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:35:04 -0400
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> • #10790
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
30 Jul 2004 22:06:57 +0200
Harrie Hazewinkel <[email protected]> • #10789
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10788
Re: proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:23:27 -0400
Nathaniel Borenstein <[email protected]> • #10787
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.