gmane.ietf.calendar archive

378 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

proposed revised charter for IETF calsch WG
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10786
proposed agenda for IETF calsch WG, Tuesday 2004-08-03 1415-1515
Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10785
Re:
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 18:59:40 -0500
"Rlmorgan" <[email protected]> • #10784
Re: question on 'LAST-MODIFIED' property
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:35:12 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10783
Re: question on 'LAST-MODIFIED' property
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:34:19 -0400
[email protected] • #10782
question on 'LAST-MODIFIED' property
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:38:28 +0200
Harrie Hazewinkel <[email protected]> • #10781
Participating in the Interop test event at UC Berkeley
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:38:04 -0700
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10780
Re: CALSCH at IETF
Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:37:43 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10779
Correct dates (29-30 July): Re: Latest on Interop testing event at UC Berkeley
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:43:13 -0700
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10778
Latest on Interop testing event at UC Berkeley
Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:18:44 -0700
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10777
Re: CALSCH at IETF
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10776
CALSCH at IETF
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:03:23 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10775
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:18:57 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10774
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:54:39 +0200
Harrie Hazewinkel <[email protected]> • #10773
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Wed, 16 Jun 2004 16:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10772
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:07:53 -0700
Ted Hardie <[email protected]> • #10771
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:04:43 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10770
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:07:35 -0400
[email protected] • #10769
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:40:31 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10768
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:19:38 -0400
[email protected] • #10767
Reminder: Calendaring Interop at UCB July 29-30 2004
Tue, 08 Jun 2004 11:24:05 -0700
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10766
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:39:49 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10765
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:59:54 -0400
[email protected] • #10764
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:44:34 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10763
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:07:18 -0400
[email protected] • #10762
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Sat, 5 Jun 2004 09:11:41 -0400
[email protected] • #10761
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 16:30:32 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10760
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 4 Jun 2004 18:02:23 -0400
[email protected] • #10759
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:24:16 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10758
Re: CAP-13: Another CAL-QUERY / VAGENDA question
Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:05:59 -0400
[email protected] • #10757
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:12:34 -0400
[email protected] • #10756
CAP-13: Defining the meaning of "*"
Fri, 4 Jun 2004 13:05:17 -0400
[email protected] • #10755
Re: CAP-13: Another CAL-QUERY / VAGENDA question
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 10:05:36 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10754
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:50:57 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10753
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:55:03 -0400
[email protected] • #10752
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:44:18 -0400
[email protected] • #10751
CAP-13: Another CAL-QUERY / VAGENDA question
Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:36:21 -0400
[email protected] • #10750
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 23:24:27 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10749
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 22:49:10 -0400
[email protected] • #10748
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:26:20 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10747
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Thu, 3 Jun 2004 17:30:47 -0400
[email protected] • #10746
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 14:38:51 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10745
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Thu, 3 Jun 2004 14:51:12 -0400
[email protected] • #10744
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:08:57 +0100
"Mike Higginbottom" <[email protected]> • #10743
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Thu, 03 Jun 2004 14:31:03 +0100
"Mike Higginbottom" <[email protected]> • #10742
Re: CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Wed, 02 Jun 2004 23:00:28 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10741
Re: CAP-12-e: TRANSP and -NOCONFLICT changes
Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:53:22 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10740
CAP 13: Bad CAL-QUERY example / description?
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 23:07:19 -0400
[email protected] • #10739
Re: CAP-12-e: TRANSP and -NOCONFLICT changes
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 18:21:59 -0400
[email protected] • #10738
Re: CAP-12-e: TRANSP and -NOCONFLICT changes
Fri, 28 May 2004 15:34:58 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10737
Re: CAP-12-e: TRANSP and -NOCONFLICT changes
Fri, 28 May 2004 15:52:19 -0400
[email protected] • #10736
Re: CAP-12-e: TRANSP and -NOCONFLICT changes
Thu, 27 May 2004 17:10:11 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10734
Re: CAP-12-e: TRANSP and -NOCONFLICT changes
Thu, 27 May 2004 18:28:30 -0400
[email protected] • #10733
C# CAP Implementation
Thu, 27 May 2004 14:54:24 -0700
"Carlos Ortega" <[email protected]> • #10732
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cap-13.txt
Thu, 27 May 2004 10:36:39 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10731
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cap-13.txt
27 May 2004 12:21:46 +0200
Harrie Hazewinkel <[email protected]> • #10730
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cap-13.txt
Tue, 25 May 2004 11:02:47 -0400
[email protected] • #10729
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-calsch-cap-13.txt
Mon, 24 May 2004 15:42:21 -0400
[email protected] • #10728
RE: Incoming Msg
Sat, 22 May 2004 15:56:31 +0530
"Pregen" <[email protected]> • #10726
draft-hare-xcalendar-00.txt
Thu, 20 May 2004 22:19:20 -0400
[email protected] • #10725
Re: CAP-12-e: TRANSP and -NOCONFLICT changes
Thu, 20 May 2004 10:49:17 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10724
CAP-12-e: TRANSP and -NOCONFLICT changes
Wed, 19 May 2004 16:55:42 -0400
[email protected] • #10723
Re: [Fwd: Re: draft - 13-a soon]
Mon, 17 May 2004 21:54:21 -0400
[email protected] • #10722
Re: CAP-12-e: TRANSP has misleading ABNF comments
Wed, 19 May 2004 09:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10721
CAP-12-e: TRANSP has misleading ABNF comments
Wed, 19 May 2004 10:50:12 -0400
[email protected] • #10720
draft-hare-xcalendar-00
Sun, 16 May 2004 22:22:14 -0400
[email protected] • #10719
Re: xCalendar draft revision submitted
Thu, 13 May 2004 12:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10718
[Fwd: Re: draft - 13-a soon]
Tue, 11 May 2004 10:07:09 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10717
www.coordidate.org
Tue, 11 May 2004 10:36:53 -0400
Thomas Gagné <[email protected]> • #10716
Re: xCalendar draft revision submitted
Tue, 11 May 2004 08:30:24 +0100 (BST)
Libby Miller <[email protected]> • #10715
Re: xCalendar draft revision submitted
Mon, 10 May 2004 20:42:12 -0400
[email protected] • #10714
Re: A note regarding XSL and xCalendar
Mon, 10 May 2004 14:36:35 -0400
John Stracke <[email protected]> • #10713
A note regarding XSL and xCalendar
Mon, 10 May 2004 14:23:16 -0400
[email protected] • #10712
Re: xCalendar draft revision submitted
Mon, 10 May 2004 13:45:31 -0400
John Stracke <[email protected]> • #10711
Re: xCalendar draft revision submitted
Mon, 10 May 2004 13:30:04 -0400
[email protected] • #10710
Re: xCalendar draft revision submitted
Mon, 10 May 2004 13:11:38 -0400
John Stracke <[email protected]> • #10709
Re: xCalendar draft revision submitted
Mon, 10 May 2004 11:55:44 -0500
Gary Frederick <[email protected]> • #10708
Re: xCalendar draft revision submitted
Mon, 10 May 2004 12:19:29 -0400
John Stracke <[email protected]> • #10707
xCalendar draft revision submitted
Mon, 10 May 2004 12:03:28 -0400
[email protected] • #10706
First Interop sponsored by C&S Consortium: July 29-30 at UCB
Mon, 03 May 2004 07:12:01 -0700
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10705
More about First Interop Sponsored by Calendaring & Scheduling Consortium
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:06:34 -0700
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10704
Re: interop dates
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:55:51 -0400
[email protected] • #10703
Re: interop dates
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:37:05 -0700
Ted Hardie <[email protected]> • #10702
Re: interop dates
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:44:35 -0700
Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> • #10701
(unknown)
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #10700
Re: representing an event vs a calendar?
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:45:51 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10699
(unknown)
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #10698
Re: Scheduling the First Interop sponsored by The Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:00:34 -0700
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10697
Re: Scheduling the First Interop sponsored by The Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:38:05 -0400
Cyrus Daboo <[email protected]> • #10696
Scheduling the First Interop sponsored by The Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium
Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:24:12 -0700
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10695
representing an event vs a calendar?
Sun, 18 Apr 2004 04:54:44 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #10694
draft - 13-a soon
Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:47:26 -0600
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10693
[iesg-secretary #27313] Here is the document (Autoreply)
Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:56:08 -0400
Support Online <[email protected]> • #10692
minutes from calsch WG meeting at IETF 59, 2004-03-02
Fri, 2 Apr 2004 15:49:51 -0800 (PST)
"RL 'Bob' Morgan" <[email protected]> • #10691
Status of Calendaring and Scheduling Consortium
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:08:15 -0800
"David C. Thewlis" <[email protected]> • #10690
Re: RELATED-TO
Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:22:41 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10689
Re: RELATED-TO
Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:26:09 -0000
"Mike Higginbottom" <[email protected]> • #10688
Re: RELATED-TO
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:56:33 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10686
RELATED-TO
Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:03:30 -0000
"Mike Higginbottom" <[email protected]> • #10685
Re: diff bewteen Vtodo with Vevent and VFreeBusy with VJournay?
Fri, 12 Mar 2004 11:20:34 -0700
Doug Royer <[email protected]> • #10684
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.