gmane.ietf.rfc822 archive
1437 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 15). Latest articles →
Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:07:59 -0800 (PST)Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:34:43 -0800 (PST)Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:18:35 +0000Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:04:22 -0800 (PST)Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:27:06 +0000Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:54:30 -0800 (PST)Re: [ietf-smtp] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:41:48 -0800 (PST)Re: [ietf-smtp] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:17:50 -0500Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:50:20 +0000Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:00:58 -0500Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:02:00 -0600Re: The MIME-Version header and comments
Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:00:18 -0800 (PST)The MIME-Version header and comments
Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:01:07 +0100Re: Limiting the amount of msg-ids in the References header
Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:45:15 -0700Limiting the amount of msg-ids in the References header
Sat, 03 Nov 2012 20:49:44 +0100Re: EAI and ADSP/DMARC
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:44:09 -0700Re: EAI and ADSP/DMARC
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:05:39 -0700Re: EAI and ADSP/DMARC
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:03:11 -0700Re: EAI and ADSP/DMARC
12 Sep 2012 19:46:47 -0000Re: EAI and ADSP/DMARC
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:37:20 +0200Re: EAI and ADSP/DMARC
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:17:13 +0000Re: [EAI] EAI and ADSP/DMARC
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:06:46 -0400Re: EAI and ADSP/DMARC
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:55:44 -0400Re: EAI and ADSP/DMARC
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 01:57:58 +0000Re: EAI and ADSP/DMARC
12 Sep 2012 01:36:04 -0000EAI and ADSP/DMARC
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:59:19 +0000Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 01:37:07 -0700Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:50:14 -0700 (PDT)Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:30:07 -0700 (PDT)Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:34:19 -0700Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:47:43 -0700 (PDT)Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:21:26 -0400Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:12:23 -0700 (PDT)Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:26:03 -0400Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 23:17:02 -0700 (PDT)Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Sun, 9 Sep 2012 17:09:48 -0400Re: interpretation of whitespace inside obs-phrase
Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:30:01 +0000 (UTC)Re: interpretation of whitespace inside obs-phrase
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:17:12 +0300interpretation of whitespace inside obs-phrase
Sat, 25 Aug 2012 05:25:16 +0000 (UTC)Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header - how about sender?
9 Aug 2012 00:32:47 -0400Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header - how about sender?
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 00:13:21 -0400Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Thu, 9 Aug 2012 00:10:50 -0400Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header - how about sender?
Wed, 08 Aug 2012 18:40:14 -0700 (PDT)Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:42:11 -0400Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header - how about sender?
8 Aug 2012 21:33:32 -0000Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
8 Aug 2012 21:30:25 -0000Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:40:58 +0200Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header
2 Aug 2012 10:39:45 -0700Re: Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header field
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:21:23 -0400Update to RFC 5322 to allow "group" syntax in the "from" header field
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:19:50 -0400New Non-WG Mailing List: IETF-822
Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:37:51 -0700FW: [apps-discuss] Call for Adoption: draft-kucherawy-received-state-02.txt
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:44:43 +0000draft-kucherawy-received-state
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:44:07 -0800Re: Do S/MIME and OpenPGP protect message headers?
Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:12:33 -0800Do S/MIME and OpenPGP protect message headers?
Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:27:42 +0100Privicons and redaction
Fri, 09 Dec 2011 13:18:22 +0100draft-koenig-privicons-03.txt
Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:54:06 -0800Re: FW: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Tue, 10 May 2011 11:52:16 -0700[Fwd: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document]
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:45:29 +0100Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:38:21 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:19:19 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:55:48 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:35:59 -0400RE: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:29:10 -0700Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:24:41 -0400Re: FW: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:25:07 GMTRe: FW: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:40:20 -0400Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:56:08 -0700Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:13:32 +0100Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:00:09 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:45:34 -0700 (PDT)Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:44:50 -0400Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:05:24 -0400Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:44:16 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:36:58 -0700Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:48:58 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:47:08 +0100Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:19:49 +0100Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:10:55 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:08:13 +0100Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Sat, 16 Apr 2011 19:54:49 +0200Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Sat, 16 Apr 2011 10:45:37 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Sat, 16 Apr 2011 10:39:13 +0200Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:27:35 +0100RE: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:09:26 -0700 (PDT)Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:45:57 -0700Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:20:50 -0700Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:25:49 +0200Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:45:12 -0400RE: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:01:53 -0700Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:41:43 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:22:59 -0700RE: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:12:12 -0700Re: [apps-discuss] Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:08:51 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:06:03 -0400RE: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:04:27 -0700Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:03:42 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:00:22 -0400Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:58:28 -0700Re: Comments on Malformed Message BCP draft
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:45:55 -0400
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.