gmane.ietf.rfc822 archive

1437 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 15). Latest articles →

Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 07:28:42 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #12656
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 13:02:31 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12655
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:39:42 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12654
Re: DMARC Extension for 3rd party Signers
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 01:51:28 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12653
Re: DMARC Extension for 3rd party Signers
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 01:14:06 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #12652
DMARC Extension for 3rd party Signers
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 00:59:09 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12651
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 00:17:26 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #12650
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 23:58:18 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12649
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 23:45:33 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #12648
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:44:45 -0700
S Moonesamy <[email protected]> • #12647
Re: a detour into SPF, was Mailing lists - assumptions
20 Apr 2014 01:39:51 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12646
Re: A permission to re-sign header
20 Apr 2014 01:35:00 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12645
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 20:38:38 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #12644
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12643
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 20:00:05 -0400
Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> • #12642
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
19 Apr 2014 19:18:02 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12641
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
19 Apr 2014 19:15:51 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12640
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:57:57 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12639
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:55:16 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12638
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12637
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 14:42:20 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #12636
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:36:53 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #12635
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12634
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
19 Apr 2014 16:39:37 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12633
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
19 Apr 2014 16:26:08 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12632
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:57:24 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #12631
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:52:41 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #12630
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:43:04 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #12629
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12628
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:07:03 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #12627
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 09:05:23 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #12626
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:57:48 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #12625
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 08:56:26 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #12624
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:12:35 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #12623
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:49:06 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12622
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:39:20 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12621
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12620
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:01:57 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #12619
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:43:41 -0700
Jim Fenton <[email protected]> • #12618
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:23:44 -0400
Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> • #12617
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:19:25 +0000
"MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <[email protected]> • #12616
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 17:08:39 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #12615
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:04:06 +0000
"MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <[email protected]> • #12614
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:38:37 +0100
Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]> • #12613
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 20:38:09 +0000
[email protected] • #12612
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:33:24 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12611
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 20:26:12 +0000
[email protected] • #12610
Re: A permission to re-sign header
18 Apr 2014 16:18:11 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12609
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:06:54 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12608
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:00:45 -0700
Jim Fenton <[email protected]> • #12607
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:57:57 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12606
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:55:37 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12605
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:49:31 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12604
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:45:26 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12603
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:38:11 -0700
Jim Fenton <[email protected]> • #12602
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:27:13 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12601
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:20:04 -0400
Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]> • #12600
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 12:10:46 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12599
Re: A permission to re-sign header
18 Apr 2014 15:05:54 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12598
Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:43:51 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12597
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:34:04 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12596
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 13:32:07 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12595
Re: A permission to re-sign header
18 Apr 2014 14:32:05 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12594
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:16:03 -0700
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #12593
Re: A permission to re-sign header
18 Apr 2014 11:44:00 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12592
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:23:29 -0700
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #12591
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:22:17 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12590
Re: A permission to re-sign header
18 Apr 2014 12:37:21 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12589
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:17:09 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12588
A permission to re-sign header
18 Apr 2014 02:19:25 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12587
Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists
18 Apr 2014 01:37:33 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12586
Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special
18 Apr 2014 01:29:34 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12585
List-Id on the receiving end
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:15:06 +0400
Vasiliy Faronov <[email protected]> • #12584
Re: Correct value for EHLO when submitting mail
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:46:09 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12583
Re: Correct value for EHLO when submitting mail
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 23:38:06 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12582
Re: Correct value for EHLO when submitting mail
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 17:14:32 -0800
"Carl S. Gutekunst" <[email protected]> • #12581
Re: Correct value for EHLO when submitting mail
Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:59:48 +0100
Jan Kundrát <[email protected]> • #12580
Re: Correct value for EHLO when submitting mail
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:51:10 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #12579
Re: Correct value for EHLO when submitting mail
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:29:30 +0000
Tony Finch <[email protected]> • #12578
Re: Correct value for EHLO when submitting mail
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:23:47 +0100
Patrick Ben Koetter <[email protected]> • #12577
Re: Correct value for EHLO when submitting mail
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:58:52 -0800
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12576
Correct value for EHLO when submitting mail
Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:08:22 +0100
Jan Kundrát <[email protected]> • #12575
Re: Is RFC5322 a 'protocol'?
Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:08:41 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12574
Re: Is RFC5322 a 'protocol'?
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 18:20:21 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #12573
Re: Is RFC5322 a 'protocol'?
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:30:35 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12572
Re: Is RFC5322 a 'protocol'?
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:11:50 +0100
"Rolf E. Sonneveld" <[email protected]> • #12571
Is RFC5322 a 'protocol'?
Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:28:19 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12570
Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science
Sat, 27 Apr 2013 12:53:45 -0400
[email protected] • #12569
Authentication-Results
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:55:24 -0700
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #12568
Authentication-Results
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 09:54:43 -0700
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #12567
Re: Different "replying" modes in a MUA
Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:25:54 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #12566
Re: Different "replying" modes in a MUA
Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:22:27 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12565
Re: Different "replying" modes in a MUA
Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:44:11 -0800 (PST)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12564
Re: Different "replying" modes in a MUA
Fri, 4 Jan 2013 23:14:59 -0500
Keith Moore <[email protected]> • #12563
Re: Different "replying" modes in a MUA
Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:15:43 -0800
SM <[email protected]> • #12562
Different "replying" modes in a MUA
Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:44:33 +0100
Jan Kundrát <[email protected]> • #12561
Detecting message/rfc822 file type
Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:20:21 +0100
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12560
Re: [ietf-smtp] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:55:39 +0100
Christoph Anton Mitterer <[email protected]> • #12559
Re: [ietf-smtp] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 5 Dec 2012 07:35:32 -0800
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12558
Re: [ietf-smtp] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5322 (3400)
Wed, 05 Dec 2012 07:31:06 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12557
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.