gmane.ietf.rfc822 archive

1437 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 15). Latest articles →

Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Fri, 27 Jun 2014 14:48:50 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #12756
Re: Aptness of DKIM for MLs
Sun, 08 Jun 2014 09:05:06 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12755
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 8 Jun 2014 02:05:58 +0100
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #12754
Re: Aptness of DKIM for MLs
Sat, 7 Jun 2014 23:46:02 +0100
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #12753
Re: Aptness of DKIM for MLs
Fri, 06 Jun 2014 12:44:32 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12752
Re: Aptness of DKIM for MLs
Thu, 5 Jun 2014 11:34:06 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #12751
Re: Aptness of DKIM for MLs
Fri, 09 May 2014 13:05:27 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12750
Re: Aptness of DKIM for MLs
Fri, 09 May 2014 08:44:13 -0700
S Moonesamy <[email protected]> • #12749
Re: Aptness of DKIM for MLs
Fri, 09 May 2014 12:23:24 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12748
Re: Aptness of DKIM for MLs
Thu, 08 May 2014 10:59:19 -0700
S Moonesamy <[email protected]> • #12747
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Wed, 07 May 2014 12:10:40 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12746
Aptness of DKIM for MLs
Wed, 07 May 2014 12:06:42 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12745
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (on-topic)
Tue, 06 May 2014 15:10:48 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12744
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
Mon, 05 May 2014 13:47:32 -0700
S Moonesamy <[email protected]> • #12743
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
6 May 2014 17:09:34 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12742
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Mon, 05 May 2014 23:29:05 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12741
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Tue, 6 May 2014 10:34:52 -0700
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12740
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
Mon, 05 May 2014 18:30:30 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #12739
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Tue, 6 May 2014 10:26:55 -0700
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12738
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
6 May 2014 17:12:38 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12737
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
5 May 2014 16:45:58 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12736
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Tue, 06 May 2014 11:12:17 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #12735
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Mon, 5 May 2014 19:34:27 -0700
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #12734
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
Tue, 06 May 2014 01:44:09 -0700
S Moonesamy <[email protected]> • #12733
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
Mon, 05 May 2014 21:19:11 -0400
Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> • #12732
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
Mon, 05 May 2014 21:27:04 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #12731
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
Tue, 06 May 2014 07:12:30 -0400
Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> • #12730
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (on-topic)
Tue, 06 May 2014 13:02:47 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12729
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
Mon, 05 May 2014 14:42:27 -0400
Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> • #12728
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
5 May 2014 22:41:49 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12727
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Mon, 5 May 2014 11:32:32 -0700
Brandon Long <[email protected]> • #12726
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Mon, 5 May 2014 11:19:00 -0700
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #12725
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
6 May 2014 02:01:59 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12724
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to... (off-topic)
Mon, 05 May 2014 13:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12723
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Mon, 05 May 2014 12:10:28 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12722
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 16:40:50 -0400
Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> • #12721
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 13:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12720
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
4 May 2014 19:37:42 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12719
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 15:32:57 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #12718
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 15:27:08 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #12717
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
4 May 2014 19:26:22 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12716
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 14:33:25 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12715
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 4 May 2014 11:39:26 -0700
Bart Schaefer <[email protected]> • #12714
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 4 May 2014 18:03:08 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #12713
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
4 May 2014 11:42:48 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12712
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
4 May 2014 11:40:30 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12711
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 08:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12710
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 08:29:49 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #12709
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 08:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12708
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
4 May 2014 14:08:18 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12707
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 4 May 2014 15:32:25 +0200
Arnt Gulbrandsen <[email protected]> • #12706
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
4 May 2014 13:13:30 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12705
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
4 May 2014 09:03:02 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12704
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 07:51:51 -0400
Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> • #12703
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 12:01:03 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12702
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 12:00:56 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12701
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 11:28:21 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12700
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sun, 04 May 2014 09:06:16 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #12699
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sat, 03 May 2014 20:35:23 -0400
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> • #12698
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sat, 03 May 2014 17:13:55 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12697
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sat, 03 May 2014 22:31:17 +0200
"Rolf E. Sonneveld" <[email protected]> • #12696
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sat, 03 May 2014 19:59:06 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #12695
Re: WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
3 May 2014 14:37:51 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12694
WSJ/gmail/ML, was a permission to...
Sat, 03 May 2014 20:29:17 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12693
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Sat, 03 May 2014 12:42:57 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12692
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Fri, 2 May 2014 10:09:03 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #12691
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Fri, 02 May 2014 12:44:07 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12690
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
2 May 2014 10:42:32 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12689
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Fri, 2 May 2014 09:33:10 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12688
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Fri, 02 May 2014 13:58:41 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #12687
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Fri, 02 May 2014 14:48:14 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12686
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Fri, 2 May 2014 00:42:44 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #12685
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
1 May 2014 19:54:49 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12684
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
1 May 2014 03:29:45 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12683
Re: We need a DKIM Policy Working Group
Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:23:21 -0700
S Moonesamy <[email protected]> • #12682
We need a DKIM Policy Working Group
Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:10:48 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12681
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:15:34 -0700
Douglas Otis <[email protected]> • #12680
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Wed, 30 Apr 2014 08:54:54 -0700
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12679
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Sat, 26 Apr 2014 10:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12678
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Sat, 26 Apr 2014 19:32:05 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12677
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Sat, 26 Apr 2014 07:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12676
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
26 Apr 2014 13:33:37 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12675
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sat, 26 Apr 2014 13:07:11 +0200
Jan Kundrát <[email protected]> • #12674
Re: one can re-sign without a permission to re-sign header
Sat, 26 Apr 2014 12:31:35 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12673
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 25 Apr 2014 18:01:07 -0400
Miles Fidelman <[email protected]> • #12672
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Fri, 25 Apr 2014 23:57:20 +0200
"Rolf E. Sonneveld" <[email protected]> • #12671
Re: don't need a permission to re-sign header
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12670
Re: don't need a permission to re-sign header
22 Apr 2014 19:56:48 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12669
Re: don't need a permission to re-sign header
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12668
Re: don't need a permission to re-sign header
22 Apr 2014 20:24:03 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12667
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:38:34 +0100
Paul Smith <[email protected]> • #12666
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:15:39 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #12665
Re: A permission to re-sign header
Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12664
Re: a detour into SPF, was Mailing lists - assumptions
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 22:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12663
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions {dkim-fail}
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 21:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Ned Freed <[email protected]> • #12662
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:57:18 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12661
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
20 Apr 2014 12:14:38 -0400
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #12660
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:32:38 -0500
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> • #12659
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
20 Apr 2014 14:23:16 -0000
"John Levine" <[email protected]> • #12658
Re: Mailing lists - assumptions
Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:01:52 -0400
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #12657
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.