gmane.ietf.zeroconf archive
382 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →
Re: WG ACTION: 1 week continued discussion [LL70] DNAv4 normative or informative?
Wed, 26 May 2004 11:42:20 +0100Re: WG ACTION: 1 week continued discussion [LL63] Text should be more explicit
Wed, 26 May 2004 11:18:14 +0100Re: WG ACTION: continued 1 week discussion [LL53] Forward references requested
Wed, 26 May 2004 11:12:04 +0100Re: resolution of LL57
Wed, 26 May 2004 10:20:21 +0100Re: resolution of LL52 LL54 LL55 LL56 LL57 LL58 LL59 LL60 LL61 LL62 LL64 LL65 LL66 LL67 LL68 LL69
Tue, 25 May 2004 18:00:29 +0200 (CEST)WG ACTION: 1 week continued discussion [LL70] DNAv4 normative or informative?
Tue, 25 May 2004 17:56:34 +0200 (CEST)WG ACTION: 1 week continued discussion [LL63] Text should be more explicit
Tue, 25 May 2004 17:55:28 +0200 (CEST)WG ACTION: continued 1 week discussion [LL53] Forward references requested
Tue, 25 May 2004 17:54:30 +0200 (CEST)resolution of LL52 LL54 LL55 LL56 LL57 LL58 LL59 LL60 LL61 LL62 LL64 LL65 LL66 LL67 LL68 LL69
Tue, 25 May 2004 17:52:37 +0200 (CEST)Re: remove
Thu, 20 May 2004 16:06:37 -0400 (EDT)remove
Thu, 20 May 2004 16:02:00 -0400 (EDT)Re: LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Wed, 19 May 2004 06:49:23 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Wed, 19 May 2004 10:05:27 +0100Re: LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Wed, 19 May 2004 09:48:20 +0100Re: LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Tue, 18 May 2004 15:34:09 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Tue, 18 May 2004 15:25:32 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Tue, 18 May 2004 13:51:39 -0700Re: LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Tue, 18 May 2004 14:48:22 -0700Re: LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Tue, 18 May 2004 21:34:32 +0100Re: LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Tue, 18 May 2004 10:12:11 -0700LL70: Use of the term "valid"
Tue, 18 May 2004 09:47:23 -0700 (PDT)Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL67] Fix clause which forbids routable to LL communication
Mon, 17 May 2004 12:17:02 +1000Re: LL67
Sun, 16 May 2004 16:28:48 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL65
Sun, 16 May 2004 16:22:58 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL70
Sun, 16 May 2004 16:19:19 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL64
Sun, 16 May 2004 16:07:08 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL63
Sun, 16 May 2004 16:03:51 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL60
Sun, 16 May 2004 15:01:32 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL59
Sun, 16 May 2004 15:01:01 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL58
Sun, 16 May 2004 15:00:39 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL57
Sun, 16 May 2004 15:00:05 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL56
Sun, 16 May 2004 14:59:46 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL55
Sun, 16 May 2004 14:59:18 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL54
Sun, 16 May 2004 14:58:55 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL53
Sun, 16 May 2004 14:58:14 -0700 (PDT)Re: LL52
Sun, 16 May 2004 14:57:49 -0700 (PDT)RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Tue, 11 May 2004 15:54:20 -0400RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Tue, 11 May 2004 12:43:02 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL67] Fix clause which forbids routable to LL communication
Tue, 11 May 2004 14:47:07 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Tue, 11 May 2004 14:42:58 -0400Please comment on [LL67] and [LL61]
Mon, 10 May 2004 16:47:42 +0200 (MEST)Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Mon, 10 May 2004 16:40:06 +0200 (MEST)Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Mon, 10 May 2004 08:44:20 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Mon, 10 May 2004 08:40:15 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Sat, 08 May 2004 08:24:11 +0700RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 7 May 2004 17:21:05 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Fri, 7 May 2004 16:30:46 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 7 May 2004 16:04:57 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 7 May 2004 15:57:52 -0700RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 7 May 2004 15:57:10 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Fri, 7 May 2004 21:50:03 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL57] Straightforward editorial fixes
Fri, 7 May 2004 21:33:28 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL66] Additional statistical example
Fri, 07 May 2004 17:32:30 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 07 May 2004 17:21:27 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 7 May 2004 21:12:15 -0000RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 7 May 2004 13:50:06 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL57] Straightforward editorial fixes
Sat, 08 May 2004 03:23:41 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Sat, 08 May 2004 03:21:23 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL60] Forward reference style
Sat, 08 May 2004 02:24:15 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL55] 'Prevent' is too strong
Sat, 08 May 2004 02:13:05 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL68] Stress constants are not user configurable
Fri, 7 May 2004 10:53:09 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Fri, 7 May 2004 10:52:22 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL57] Straightforward editorial fixes
Fri, 7 May 2004 10:51:55 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 7 May 2004 10:46:39 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 07 May 2004 11:33:59 -0400RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Fri, 7 May 2004 07:24:40 -0700RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 7 May 2004 07:14:38 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL69] Move constants to beginning of doc
Fri, 07 May 2004 09:10:48 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Fri, 07 May 2004 09:08:03 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL60] Forward reference style
Fri, 07 May 2004 09:07:20 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL59] Wireless comment not needed
Fri, 07 May 2004 09:04:31 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL54] Consistent terminology for out of scope
Fri, 07 May 2004 09:02:20 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL52] Text surrounding RFC 2119 clause is poor
Fri, 07 May 2004 09:00:05 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL69] Move constants to beginning of doc
Fri, 07 May 2004 08:56:33 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL68] Stress constants are not user configurable
Fri, 07 May 2004 08:52:42 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL70] DNAv4 normative or informative?
Fri, 7 May 2004 12:53:18 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL69] Move constants to beginning of doc
Fri, 7 May 2004 12:34:19 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL68] Stress constants are not user configurable
Fri, 7 May 2004 12:32:56 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL67] Fix clause which forbids routable to LL communication
Fri, 7 May 2004 12:30:27 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL66] Additional statistical example
Fri, 7 May 2004 12:27:30 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL64] Simplify some text
Fri, 7 May 2004 12:21:53 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Fri, 7 May 2004 12:16:54 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Fri, 7 May 2004 12:00:40 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL60] Forward reference style
Fri, 7 May 2004 11:56:15 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL59] Wireless comment not needed
Fri, 7 May 2004 11:54:06 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL58] Duplicate inconsistent routable address definition
Fri, 7 May 2004 11:47:37 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL57] Straightforward editorial fixes
Fri, 7 May 2004 11:39:06 -0000RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL53] Forward references requested
Fri, 7 May 2004 04:21:32 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL55] 'Prevent' is too strong
Fri, 7 May 2004 11:09:25 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL54] Consistent terminology for out of scope
Fri, 7 May 2004 11:05:57 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL53] Forward references requested
Fri, 7 May 2004 11:02:19 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL56] Contradictory text?
Fri, 7 May 2004 10:53:45 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL52] Text surrounding RFC 2119 clause is poor
Fri, 7 May 2004 10:40:03 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL65] Need a requirement for multihomed hosts
Fri, 7 May 2004 09:56:28 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL52] Text surrounding RFC 2119 clause is poor
Fri, 07 May 2004 05:52:45 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Fri, 7 May 2004 09:34:35 -0000RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Thu, 6 May 2004 23:01:02 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL68] Stress constants are not user configurable
Thu, 6 May 2004 23:00:12 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL66] Additional statistical example
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:58:37 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL65] Need a requirement for multihomed hosts
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:57:27 -0700
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.