gmane.ietf.zeroconf archive
383 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →
Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:56:02 -0700RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:54:56 -0700RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:53:19 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL60] Forward reference style
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:52:08 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL59] Wireless comment not needed
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:50:52 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL58] Duplicate inconsistent routable address definition
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:49:28 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL56] Contradictory text?
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:47:29 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL55] 'Prevent' is too strong
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:47:02 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL55] 'Prevent' is too strong
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:40:58 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL53] Forward references requested
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:39:15 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL52] Text surrounding RFC 2119 clause is poor
Thu, 6 May 2004 22:34:44 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL69] Move constants to beginning of doc
Wed, 05 May 2004 07:54:49 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL57] Straightforward editorial fixes
Wed, 05 May 2004 07:45:44 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL70] DNAv4 normative or informative?
Wed, 05 May 2004 08:11:30 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL55] 'Prevent' is too strong
Wed, 05 May 2004 07:58:10 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL54] Consistent terminology for out of scope
Wed, 05 May 2004 07:56:23 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL68] Stress constants are not user configurable
Wed, 05 May 2004 08:05:02 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Wed, 05 May 2004 08:02:15 +0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL65] Need a requirement for multihomed hosts
Wed, 05 May 2004 07:51:59 +0700Re: IPR notice regarding draft-ietf-zeroconf-IPv4-linklocal
Thu, 06 May 2004 06:53:23 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL66] Additional statistical example
Thu, 06 May 2004 06:46:35 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL59] Wireless comment not needed
Thu, 06 May 2004 06:44:39 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL53] Forward references requested
Thu, 06 May 2004 06:38:43 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL56] Contradictory text?
Thu, 06 May 2004 06:38:00 -0400Re: IPR notice regarding draft-ietf-zeroconf-IPv4-linklocal
Thu, 6 May 2004 20:18:38 +1000RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Wed, 05 May 2004 18:37:02 +0300RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL68] Stress constants are not user configurable
Tue, 4 May 2004 21:41:48 -0700RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Tue, 4 May 2004 21:29:26 -0700RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Tue, 4 May 2004 21:25:27 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL70] DNAv4 normative or informative?
Tue, 04 May 2004 22:44:49 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL64] Simplify some text
Tue, 04 May 2004 21:28:51 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Tue, 04 May 2004 21:27:24 -0400RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Tue, 04 May 2004 21:25:19 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL60] Forward reference style
Tue, 04 May 2004 21:21:15 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL57] Straightforward editorial fixes
Tue, 04 May 2004 21:16:48 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL55] 'Prevent' is too strong
Tue, 04 May 2004 21:09:27 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL54] Consistent terminology for out of scope
Tue, 04 May 2004 20:54:04 -0400Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL52] Text surrounding RFC 2119 clause is poor
Tue, 04 May 2004 20:53:03 -0400Re: IPR notice regarding draft-ietf-zeroconf-IPv4-linklocal
Tue, 4 May 2004 17:40:28 -0700Re: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Tue, 04 May 2004 20:16:31 -0400RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Tue, 4 May 2004 16:45:33 -0700RE: WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Tue, 4 May 2004 16:39:18 -0700WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL70] DNAv4 normative or informative?
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:26:14 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL69] Move constants to beginning of doc
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:24:53 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL68] Stress constants are not user configurable
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:23:25 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL67] Fix clause which forbids routable to LL communication
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:22:07 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL66] Additional statistical example
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:20:50 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL65] Need a requirement for multihomed hosts
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:19:49 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL64] Simplify some text
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:18:19 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL63] Text could be more specific
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:17:00 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL62] Do not space probes randomly
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:11:53 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL61] Remove initial wait
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:07:14 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL60] Forward reference style
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:05:44 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL59] Wireless comment not needed
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:04:43 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL58] Duplicate inconsistent routable address definition
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:03:37 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL57] Straightforward editorial fixes
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:02:06 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL55] 'Prevent' is too strong
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:00:48 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL54] Consistent terminology for out of scope
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:00:29 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL52] Text surrounding RFC 2119 clause is poor
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:00:16 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL53] Forward references requested
Wed, 5 May 2004 01:00:06 +0200WG ACTION: 2 weeks to discuss [LL56] Contradictory text?
Wed, 5 May 2004 00:59:46 +0200WG status - last minute issues to consider
Wed, 5 May 2004 00:40:53 +0200IPR notice regarding draft-ietf-zeroconf-IPv4-linklocal
Wed, 5 May 2004 00:35:59 +0200Out of Office AutoReply: <Possible SPAM> Re: Your music
Sat, 1 May 2004 23:58:55 +0300Re: Msg reply
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:19:06 -0500Incoming message
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:19:06 -0500WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL51] Embellish Address Ambiguity problem statement
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:40:22 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL50] Simple forwarding rule text needs caveat
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:39:12 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL49] Lower case 2 MUSTs
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:38:05 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL48] Some security section text should be relocated
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:36:54 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL47] IESG nits
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:35:37 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL46] Text implies limited applicability
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:33:54 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL45] Embellish text coping with scoped addresses
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:32:22 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: REJECT [LL44] Clarify higher layer protocol considerations
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:31:12 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL43] Clarify rules for use of LL vs routeable addresses
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:29:57 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL42] Category inconsistency for DNS / IPv4LL
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:28:44 +0200 (MEST)WG ACTION: ACCEPT [LL41] Broadcast text for IPv4 LL
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:27:07 +0200 (MEST)Re: WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL46] Text implies limited applicability
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:29:58 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL46] Text implies limited applicability
Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:40:01 -0000Re: WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL49] Lower case 2 MUSTs
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 10:14:01 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL49] Lower case 2 MUSTs
Fri, 19 Mar 2004 18:35:56 +1100Re: WG ACTION: 1 week last call on [LL41] Broadcast text for IPv4 LL (fwd)
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:01:01 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL51] Embellish Address Ambiguity problem statement
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:15:30 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL50] Simple forwarding rule needs caveat
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:13:22 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL49] Lower case 2 MUSTs
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:10:54 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL48] Some security text should be relocated
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:08:25 +0100 (MET)Re: WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL46] IESG Nits
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:03:35 +0100 (MET)Re: WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL46] Text implies limited applicability
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:46:25 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 1 week discussion [LL42] Category inconsistency for DNS /IPv4LL
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:39:34 -0500Re: WG ACTION: 1 week last call on [LL41] Broadcast text for IPv4 LL
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 14:37:38 -0500zeroconf_nemo
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:31:56 +0100zeroconfiguration_NEMO
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:22:07 +0100(should be) WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL47] IESG Nits
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:20:53 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL46] IESG Nits
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:04:28 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL46] Text implies limited applicability
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:01:47 +0100 (MET)Re: IESG review of draft-ietf-zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-13.txt
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:58:24 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL45] Embellish text coping with scoped addresses
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:53:53 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL43]
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:41:43 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week to discuss [LL44] Clarify higher layer protocol considerations
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:50:32 +0100 (MET)WG ACTION: 1 week discussion [LL42] Category inconsistency for DNS /IPv4LL
Wed, 17 Mar 2004 16:39:19 +0100 (MET)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.