gmane.linux.aurora.devel archive
372 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →
udev-063-6sparc fails to start properly with hypeSPARC....
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 18:47:08 +0200Re: binutils in corona and next Aurora release?
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:20:02 +0200Re: Hardware optimalizations on P3 Tualatin fails
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:17:39 +0200Re: Hardware optimalizations on P3 Tualatin fails
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:42:38 +0200Re: Hardware optimalizations on P3 Tualatin fails
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:39:01 +0200Re: Hardware optimalizations on P3 Tualatin fails
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:39:32 +0200Hardware optimalizations on P3 Tualatin fails
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:10:21 +0200binutils in corona and next Aurora release?
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:56:17 +0200Re: [2.6.14-rc1/sparc54]: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:59:43 +0200 (CEST)Re: [2.6.14-rc1/sparc54]: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 19:49:17 +0200 (CEST)Re: [2.6.14-rc1/sparc54]: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:22:45 +0200 (CEST)Re: [2.6.14-rc1/sparc54]: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:59:19 -0400 (EDT)Re: [2.6.14-rc1/sparc54]: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:57:15 -0400 (EDT)Re: [2.6.14-rc1/sparc54]: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:42:56 +0200 (CEST)Re: [2.6.14-rc1/sparc54]: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:36:03 -0500 (CDT)[2.6.14-rc1/sparc54]: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:40:27 +0200 (CEST)Re: [2.6.13-rc6-git13/sparc64]: Slab corruption (possible stack or buffer-cache corruption)
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:40:39 +0200 (CEST)Re: [2.6.13-rc6-git13/sparc64]: Slab corruption (possible stack or buffer-cache corruption)
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:16:20 +0200 (CEST)Re: Sun v440 and 2.6.13-1.1552sp1smp (Aurora) kernel
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:29:32 +0200Re: Sun v440 and 2.6.13-1.1552sp1smp (Aurora) kernel
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:20:21 +0200Sun v440 and 2.6.13-1.1552sp1smp (Aurora) kernel
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:15:36 +0200 (CEST)Re: [2.6.13-rc6-git13/sparc64]: Slab corruption (possible stack or buffer-cache corruption)
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:12:22 +0200 (CEST)Re: [2.6.13-rc6-git13/sparc64]: Slab corruption (possible stack or buffer-cache corruption)
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:45:05 -0500Re: [2.6.13-rc6-git13/sparc64]: Slab corruption (possible stack or buffer-cache corruption)
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:39:10 +0200 (CEST)Re: [2.6.13-rc6-git13/sparc64]: Slab corruption (possible stack or buffer-cache corruption)
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:45:16 -0500[2.6.13-rc6-git13/sparc64]: Slab corruption (possible stack or buffer-cache corruption)
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:37:04 +0200 (CEST)Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:44:01 -0400Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Mon, 05 Sep 2005 16:50:51 -0400Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Mon, 05 Sep 2005 16:52:12 -0400Re: RPM 4.4 on SPARC
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:48:46 -0400RPM 4.4 on SPARC
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:39:50 -0400 (EDT)Kashmir running on Spacely.
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:28:24 -0400 (EDT)Kashmir running on Spacely.
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:29:02 -0400 (EDT)Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:25:14 -0400 (EDT)corona kernel-smp-2.6.11-1.1166sp1 OOPses
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 14:22:23 +0200 (CEST)Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:26:17 +0200Benchmarking an E6500 against a dual Xeon 3GHz Dell 2650
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:26:35 -0400Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 22:08:58 -0400Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 21:57:48 -0400Re: Access to OBP Environment variables from Linux?
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 18:29:56 -0400 (EDT)Re: Access to OBP Environment variables from Linux?
Sun, 04 Sep 2005 16:11:28 -0500Access to OBP Environment variables from Linux?
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:00:40 -0400 (EDT)Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 19:39:33 +0200 (CEST)Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:18:14 -0500Re: PARI's E6500 Status.
Sun, 04 Sep 2005 08:25:45 -0500PARI's E6500 Status.
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 22:42:28 -0400Re: Fwd: sparc32 SMP under 2.6?
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 18:03:31 -0300Re: Fwd: sparc32 SMP under 2.6?
Sat, 03 Sep 2005 14:12:42 -0400Fwd: sparc32 SMP under 2.6?
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 18:41:03 +0200Re: Hefty Big Iron Sun Machines.
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:56:46 -0500Re: Hefty Big Iron Sun Machines.
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:07:42 +0200 (CEST)Re: Hefty Big Iron Sun Machines.
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 01:13:20 -0400 (EDT)Re: Hefty Big Iron Sun Machines.
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:34:37 -0400 (EDT)Re: Hefty Big Iron Sun Machines.
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:49:26 -0400 (EDT)Re: Hefty Big Iron Sun Machines.
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 23:37:33 -0400Re: Hefty Big Iron Sun Machines.
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:22:18 -0500Hefty Big Iron Sun Machines.
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:21:43 -0400Re: Aurora Linux Still Active? Can I help?
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:54:04 +0200Aurora Linux Still Active? Can I help?
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:18:28 -0700Difficult "bug" with gcc, or glibc, or kernel...
Sat, 6 Aug 2005 10:08:31 +0200Re: Aurora 1.0 and v100
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:21:24 +0200 (CEST)Re: Aurora 1.0 and v100
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:34:54 +0200 (CEST)Re: Aurora 1.0 and v100
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:25:34 -0500Re: Aurora 1.0 and v100
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:12:16 +0200 (CEST)Re: Aurora 1.0 and v100
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:58:26 -0500Aurora 1.0 and v100
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:51:06 +0200 (CEST)FC 3 updates recompiled for Corona
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:30:24 +0200ADMIN: Mail Server Downtime
Sun, 8 May 2005 23:49:51 -0400afbinit improvements
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:51:28 +0200Status of Corona
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 12:40:48 -0300Re: Build hosts
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:27:10 -0500Re: Build hosts
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:36:12 -0700Re: Build hosts
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:50:30 +0100Re: Build hosts
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:24:26 -0600 (CST)Re: Build hosts
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:58:13 -0600Re: Build hosts
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:43:10 -0600 (CST)Build hosts
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:03:16 -0600Re: sparc64 userland and SRPMS
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 18:38:25 -0500 (EST)sparc64 userland and SRPMS
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 20:57:55 +0100Re: Can't build libjava in gcc cvs trunk 20050227 on sparc-linux: ar cq libgcj0_convenience.a ... Bus error: in bfd_hash_lookup () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.15.92.0.2.so
Sat, 5 Mar 2005 12:30:40 +0100Re: Can't build libjava in gcc cvs trunk 20050227 on sparc-linux: ar cq libgcj0_convenience.a ... Bus error: in bfd_hash_lookup () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.15.92.0.2.so
Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:09:22 +0100Re: Can't build libjava in gcc cvs trunk 20050227 on sparc-linux: ar cq libgcj0_convenience.a ... Bus error: in bfd_hash_lookup () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.15.92.0.2.so
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:39:16 +0100Re: Can't build libjava in gcc cvs trunk 20050227 on sparc-linux: ar cq libgcj0_convenience.a ... Bus error: in bfd_hash_lookup () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.15.92.0.2.so
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 00:27:26 +0100Re: Can't build libjava in gcc cvs trunk 20050227 on sparc-linux: ar cq libgcj0_convenience.a ... Bus error: in bfd_hash_lookup () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.15.92.0.2.so
Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:37:14 +0100Can't build libjava in gcc cvs trunk 20050227 on sparc-linux: ar cq libgcj0_convenience.a ... Bus error: in bfd_hash_lookup () from /usr/lib/libbfd-2.15.92.0.2.so
Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:05:44 +0100seg fault on corona, su -
Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:23:01 +0100gcc 4.0 PCH problems and relation to kernel stuff
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:59:52 +0100Re: Missing corona packages
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:43:20 +0100Missing corona packages
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:02:42 +0100Re: parport_pc freezes my ultra 5 with 2.6 kernels
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:51:56 +0100documenting kernel build errors
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:42:35 -0600Re: Yum Updates (1.0 - 1.92)
Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:04:06 +0100Yum Updates (1.0 - 1.92)
Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:31:48 -0500aurora 1.92 and anaconda installer
Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:59:24 +0100Re: NFS problems with 1.92
Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:05:40 +0100NFS problems with 1.92
Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:29:29 +01002.6.10 kernel status?
Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:24:13 +0100Re: Bug in page.h??? Asterisk/Zaptel
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:27:42 -0600Bug in page.h??? Asterisk/Zaptel
Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:42:40 -0500 (EST)Please, help - how to compile kernel 2.6.x
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:51:55 +0100
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.