gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips archive

2301 archived articles, newest first (page 17 of 24). Latest articles →

RE: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:59:58 +0200
luigi burdo <[email protected]> • #8730
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:04:12 +0200
Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> • #8729
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:02:29 -0700
"Herminio Hernandez, Jr." <[email protected]> • #8728
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:12:52 +0200
Hector Oron <[email protected]> • #8727
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 19:40:02 -0400
Stephen Powell <[email protected]> • #8726
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:51:55 +0800
Paul Wise <[email protected]> • #8725
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Wed, 15 Jun 2016 01:37:01 +0300
Dimitri John Ledkov <[email protected]> • #8724
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:22:44 -0400
[email protected] • #8723
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Tue, 14 Jun 2016 13:00:21 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8722
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:47:08 +0200
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> • #8721
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:06:57 +0200
Philipp Kern <[email protected]> • #8720
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:33:56 +0000
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> • #8719
Re: mips64el in testing
Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:27:06 +0000
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> • #8718
Re: mips64el in testing
Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:53:28 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8717
It will be super-easy with our goods!
Thu, 09 Jun 2016 21:22:04 +0400
"Jocelyn Raymond" <[email protected]> • #8716
Invitation to a PGP/GPG survey
Thu, 9 Jun 2016 07:34:18 -0600 (MDT)
Sven Braun <[email protected]> • #8715
Re: Contributing to the project
Tue, 7 Jun 2016 23:04:00 +0300
Aaro Koskinen <[email protected]> • #8714
Re: Contributing to the project
Tue, 7 Jun 2016 07:51:06 -0300
Gustavo Prado Alkmim <[email protected]> • #8713
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Tue, 07 Jun 2016 09:24:35 +0200
Philipp Kern <[email protected]> • #8712
Re: Contributing to the project
Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:38:05 +0800
Paul Wise <[email protected]> • #8711
Re: About structure sk_buff
Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:56:01 -0700
Grant Grundler <[email protected]> • #8710
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Mon, 6 Jun 2016 11:22:37 -0400
John David Anglin <[email protected]> • #8709
Re: About structure sk_buff
Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:10:46 +0300
Corcodel Marian <[email protected]> • #8708
Contributing to the project
Mon, 06 Jun 2016 04:33:47 +0000
Jonathan Jackson <[email protected]> • #8707
Re: mips64el in testing
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:58:58 +0200
Andreas Barth <[email protected]> • #8706
Re: mips64el in testing
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 20:43:50 +0000
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> • #8705
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:37:21 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8704
Re: mips64el in testing
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 23:31:13 +0800
YunQiang Su <[email protected]> • #8703
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:46:53 +0000
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> • #8702
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 05 Jun 2016 21:50:04 +0900
Oleg Endo <[email protected]> • #8701
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:08:24 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #8700
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:56:16 +0100
Steven Chamberlain <[email protected]> • #8699
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:48:41 +0000
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> • #8698
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 05 Jun 2016 13:31:14 +0100
peter green <[email protected]> • #8697
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:24:20 +0200
Christian Seiler <[email protected]> • #8696
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:24:17 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8695
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:00:58 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #8694
Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:26:39 +0200
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> • #8693
[Stretch] Status for architecture qualification
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 10:01:48 +0000
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> • #8692
Re: mips64el in testing
Sun, 5 Jun 2016 08:41:43 +0000
Niels Thykier <[email protected]> • #8691
Re: linux_4.6-1~exp2_multi.changes REJECTED
Sat, 04 Jun 2016 18:36:17 +0100
Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> • #8690
Re: OpenJDK-8-jre-jamvm mips version start failed
Fri, 03 Jun 2016 11:13:11 +0100
James Cowgill <[email protected]> • #8689
OpenJDK-8-jre-jamvm mips version start failed
Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:59:16 +0800
飞颜 <[email protected]> • #8688
Re: [Critical] jessie openjdk-8-jre-jamvm start failed
Wed, 1 Jun 2016 23:37:31 +0800
飞颜 <[email protected]> • #8687
[Critical] jessie openjdk-8-jre-jamvm start failed
Wed, 1 Jun 2016 23:34:08 +0800
飞颜 <[email protected]> • #8686
strace build time tests fail on mips64el - missing syscall support?
Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:53:35 +0100
Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> • #8685
Re: linux_4.6-1~exp2_multi.changes REJECTED
Tue, 31 May 2016 12:38:42 +0800
YunQiang Su <[email protected]> • #8684
Re: linux_4.6-1~exp2_multi.changes REJECTED
Mon, 30 May 2016 19:13:59 +0100
Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> • #8683
Re: mips64el in testing
Wed, 25 May 2016 15:14:26 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8682
Re: mips64el in testing
Tue, 24 May 2016 18:07:15 -0700
Ed Swierk <[email protected]> • #8681
Christian Steigies
Sun, 22 May 2016 20:36:19 +0000
VICTORIA OLSEN <[email protected]> • #8680
SEE THRU METAL for Windows and Skylights
Thu, 19 May 2016 06:11:00 -0500
"Dennis Roberts" <[email protected]> • #8679
Re: libsecret testsuite failures on mipsel
Wed, 11 May 2016 18:13:36 +0200
Andreas Henriksson <[email protected]> • #8678
Re: libsecret testsuite failures on mipsel
Wed, 11 May 2016 17:39:08 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8677
Bug#821347: libsecret testsuite failures on mipsel
Tue, 10 May 2016 18:02:05 +0200
Andreas Henriksson <[email protected]> • #8676
Crie seus programas (Windows + Mac + Linux + Android + iPhone) - OPORTUNIDADE ESPECIAL
Sat, 7 May 2016 18:49:12 -0300
"Gerador de sistemas" <[email protected]> • #8675
Ultimas Plantas Eléctricas disponibles para la Venta
Thu, 5 May 2016 09:04:10 -0400
"Departamento Venta de Equipos" <[email protected]> • #8674
Re: Please consider manual building of phyml on mipsel architecture
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:29:03 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8673
Please consider manual building of phyml on mipsel architecture
Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:28:31 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #8672
Bug#821924: libvigraimpex: multi_array_chunked_hdf5.hxx corrupted on mipsel
Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:28:18 +0200
Jakub Wilk <[email protected]> • #8671
Leota ;) why not? to share secrets
Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:52:13 +0000
Sandra Gabalan <[email protected]> • #8670
Bug#821337: FTBFS on mipsel(64), gtk+3.0-3.20.3/testsuite/reftests/button-wrapping.ui: FAIL
Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:27:54 +0200
Michael Biebl <[email protected]> • #8669
Re: give back package sunpy on mipsel
Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:09:11 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8668
give back package sunpy on mipsel
Thu, 14 Apr 2016 15:09:45 +0000
Jurica Stanojkovic <[email protected]> • #8667
Re: give back package adios on mipsel and mips64el
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:13:30 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8666
give back package adios on mipsel and mips64el
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:58:32 +0000
Jurica Stanojkovic <[email protected]> • #8665
Re: Bug#816101: petsc: FTBFS on mipsel - broken openmpi breaks petsc build
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:59:22 +0800
Drew Parsons <[email protected]> • #8664
Re: give back package ray on mipsel and mips64el
Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:15:55 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8663
give back package ray on mipsel and mips64el
Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:43:30 +0000
Jurica Stanojkovic <[email protected]> • #8662
Re: Segfaults caused by new DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP_REL tag and RPATH removers
Fri, 8 Apr 2016 23:07:02 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8661
Bug#820335: Segfaults caused by new DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP_REL tag and RPATH removers
Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:56:21 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8660
Re: Segfaults caused by new DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP_REL tag and RPATH removers
Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:44:30 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8659
Re: Segfaults caused by new DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP_REL tag and RPATH removers
Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:45:00 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8658
Segfaults caused by new DT_MIPS_RLD_MAP_REL tag and RPATH removers
Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:51:41 +0100
James Cowgill <[email protected]> • #8657
Re: Help on build failure of patchelf on mips variants
Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:59:20 +0100
James Cowgill <[email protected]> • #8656
Re: mips fpu hw
Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:21:32 +0200
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> • #8655
Re: Help on build failure of patchelf on mips variants
Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:28:48 -0300
Felipe Sateler <[email protected]> • #8654
Re: Bug#820192: murasaki: FTBFS on mips*: segfault in compiler
Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:37:14 +0100
James Cowgill <[email protected]> • #8653
Re: Bug#820192: murasaki: FTBFS on mips*: segfault in compiler
Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:17:28 +0200
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> • #8652
Re: mips fpu hw
Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:39:59 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8651
Re: Help on build failure of patchelf on mips variants
Tue, 05 Apr 2016 23:39:30 +0100
James Cowgill <[email protected]> • #8650
Re: Help on build failure of patchelf on mips variants
Tue, 05 Apr 2016 23:33:31 +0100
James Cowgill <[email protected]> • #8649
Help on build failure of patchelf on mips variants
Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:13:27 -0300
Felipe Sateler <[email protected]> • #8648
Re: fortran openmpi on mipsel
Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:52:28 +0800
Drew Parsons <[email protected]> • #8647
Re: fortran openmpi on mipsel
Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:56:52 +0100
James Cowgill <[email protected]> • #8646
Re: Possible miscompilation issue with floating point operations
Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:52:33 +0200
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8645
fortran openmpi on mipsel
Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:52:08 +0800
Drew Parsons <[email protected]> • #8644
Caso de Exito - Alquiler de Grúas Odebrecht
Tue, 29 Mar 2016 01:31:41 -0400
"Gerencia - Transporte Progaven" <[email protected]> • #8643
Bug#818745: SIGILL on mips in cephes_igam leading to FTBFS of pymvpa2
Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:04:45 +0100
Yaroslav Halchenko <[email protected]> • #8642
Re: mips64el in testing
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:02:08 +0100
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> • #8641
mips fpu hw
Fri, 11 Mar 2016 19:11:44 +0100
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> • #8640
Re: mips64el in testing
Sun, 6 Mar 2016 01:21:51 +0100
Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> • #8639
Big-Endian testers wanted: Sonic Pi (in Debian testing)
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 22:40:24 +0100
Hanno Zulla <[email protected]> • #8638
mips64el in testing
Sat, 5 Mar 2016 17:40:25 +0100
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> • #8637
Making Debian ports less burdensome
Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:41:57 +0000
Steven Chamberlain <[email protected]> • #8636
Bug#815885: openjdk-8 fails to configure on mips and mips64el
Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:58:56 +0100
Matthias Klose <[email protected]> • #8635
r-bioc-variantannotation give-back
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:43:36 +0000
Jurica Stanojkovic <[email protected]> • #8634
Re: SGI O2 Jessie kernel issue
Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:03:25 +0100
Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> • #8633
Re: SGI O2 Jessie kernel issue
Sun, 21 Feb 2016 22:49:04 +0100
Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> • #8632
qjackctl give-back
Fri, 19 Feb 2016 13:52:34 +0000
Jurica Stanojkovic <[email protected]> • #8631
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.