gmane.mail.spam.crm114 archive

811 archived articles, newest first (page 7 of 9). Latest articles →

Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:59:53 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9049
Re: how to write an interactive crm program?
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:34:29 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9048
Re: how to write an interactive crm program?
Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:25:25 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9047
how to write an interactive crm program?
Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:52:50 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9046
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:09:56 -0500
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #9045
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:53:22 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9044
Re: reaver_cache directory grows without limit.
Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:30:03 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9043
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:56:38 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9042
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:37:50 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9041
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:48:55 +0100
Christian Siefkes <[email protected]> • #9040
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:38:35 +0000
Jimmy Tang <[email protected]> • #9039
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:27:52 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9038
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:47:15 +0100
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[email protected]> • #9037
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:39:26 +0000
Jimmy Tang <[email protected]> • #9036
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:37:42 +0000
Jimmy Tang <[email protected]> • #9035
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:48:13 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9034
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:43:46 +0100
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[email protected]> • #9033
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:15:00 +0300
Eugene Crosser <[email protected]> • #9032
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:10:28 +0000
Jimmy Tang <[email protected]> • #9031
Re: a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:35:15 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9030
a slightly updated rpm spec file for Ger Hobbelt crm114 branch
Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:21:58 +0000
Jimmy Tang <[email protected]> • #9029
Re: reaver_cache directory grows without limit.
Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:28:51 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9028
Re: reaver_cache directory grows without limit.
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:25:30 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9027
Re: reaver_cache directory grows without limit.
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:55:36 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9026
reaver_cache directory grows without limit.
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:12:30 +0000
Martin Ward <martin-/WQNf7Fk/[email protected]> • #9025
Re: What happened to /tarballs/?
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:16:43 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9024
Re: What happened to /tarballs/?
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:40:23 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9023
Re: What happened to /tarballs/?
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:20:17 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9022
Re: What happened to /tarballs/?
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:15:54 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9021
What happened to /tarballs/?
Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:58:18 +0100
"Steve" <[email protected]> • #9020
Re: Access to all the tarballs on the website
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:35:00 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9019
Re: Access to all the tarballs on the website
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:14:15 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9018
Access to all the tarballs on the website
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:32:56 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9017
Re: Compiling and running CRM114 on Windows?
Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:48:35 +0100
"Steve" <[email protected]> • #9016
Re: Compiling and running CRM114 on Windows?
Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:05:23 -0500
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #9015
Re: Compiling and running CRM114 on Windows?
Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:12:44 +0100
"Steve" <[email protected]> • #9014
Re: Compiling and running CRM114 on Windows?
Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:01:16 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9013
Re: Compiling and running CRM114 on Windows?
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:54:12 +0100
"Steve" <[email protected]> • #9012
Compiling and running CRM114 on Windows?
Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:24:32 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9011
Re: Kernel Edgeplay
Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:15:24 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9010
Re: Kernel Edgeplay
Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:41:22 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9009
Re: Kernel Edgeplay
Sat, 3 Jan 2009 07:55:09 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9008
Re: Kernel Edgeplay
Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:57:21 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9007
Re: Kernel Edgeplay
Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:28:43 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9006
Re: Kernel Edgeplay
Fri, 2 Jan 2009 19:56:30 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9005
Kernel Edgeplay
Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:58:54 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9004
Re: Bugs in FIFO handling
Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:25:05 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9003
Re: Bugs in FIFO handling
Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:13:02 -0700
"Trever L. Adams" <[email protected]> • #9002
Re: Behavior divergence in makefile vs. "in person".
Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:06:53 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #9001
Re: Behavior divergence in makefile vs. "in person".
Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:17:07 -0500
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #9000
Re: Behavior divergence in makefile vs. "in person".
Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:03:57 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8999
Re: Behavior divergence in makefile vs. "in person".
Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:16:09 -0500
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #8998
Re: Behavior divergence in makefile vs. "in person".
Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:35:47 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8997
Re: 2822.crm - Mail Processor
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:31:09 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8996
Re: Right Associative Matching Example (for Docs)
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:35:57 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8995
Re: Behavior divergence in makefile vs. "in person".
Fri, 19 Dec 2008 04:30:51 +0100
"Ger Hobbelt" <[email protected]> • #8994
Re: 2822.crm - Mail Processor
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:19:41 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #8993
Re: Right Associative Matching Example (for Docs)
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:04:49 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #8992
2822.crm - Mail Processor
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:30:38 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8991
Re: Right Associative Matching Example (for Docs)
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:46:36 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8990
Re: Right Associative Matching Example (for Docs)
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:43:49 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8989
Behavior divergence in makefile vs. "in person".
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:14:45 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8988
Re: Right Associative Matching Example (for Docs)
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:02:47 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #8987
Re: Right Associative Matching Example (for Docs)
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:04:19 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8986
Right Associative Matching Example (for Docs)
Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:15:55 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8985
Re: Sorting many small data sets
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:15:08 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8984
Re: Sorting many small data sets
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 10:02:45 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #8983
Sorting many small data sets
Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:00:37 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8982
Re: Odds of Recurrence for Hash Function
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:18:45 -0200
Fidelis Assis <[email protected]> • #8981
Re: Odds of Recurrence for Hash Function
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 23:14:24 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #8980
Re: Odds of Recurrence for Hash Function
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:19:21 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8979
Re: Hyperspace classifier and microgroom
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 10:25:01 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #8978
Re: Odds of Recurrence for Hash Function
Sat, 6 Dec 2008 09:05:58 -0200
"Fidelis Assis" <[email protected]> • #8977
Hyperspace classifier and microgroom
Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:15:40 +0100
Jerome Stolfo <[email protected]> • #8976
Re: Processing Email (Mbox-style) Folders
Wed, 3 Dec 2008 23:34:36 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8975
Re: Processing Email (Mbox-style) Folders
Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:23:31 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8974
Re: Odds of Recurrence for Hash Function
Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:20:39 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8973
Processing Email (Mbox-style) Folders
Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:48:14 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8972
Odds of Recurrence for Hash Function
Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:09:29 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8971
Re: Bugs in FIFO handling
Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:13:48 -0700
"Trever L. Adams" <[email protected]> • #8970
Re: Bugs in FIFO handling
Tue, 2 Dec 2008 13:59:06 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8969
Re: Bugs in FIFO handling
Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:26:00 -0700
"Trever L. Adams" <[email protected]> • #8968
Re: Problems with mailreaver.crm examples
Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:14:04 +0100
"Ger Hobbelt" <[email protected]> • #8967
Re: Bugs in FIFO handling
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:19:06 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8966
Problems with mailreaver.crm examples
Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:10:56 -0700
"Trever L. Adams" <[email protected]> • #8965
Bugs in FIFO handling
Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:12:06 -0700
"Trever L. Adams" <[email protected]> • #8964
Re: Best recent release of CRM114 for 64-bit Linux environment?
Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:55:24 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #8963
Re: Request for Comment: Callable CRM114 Classifiers (libcrm114)
Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:34:02 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8962
Re: Request for Comment: Callable CRM114 Classifiers (libcrm114)
Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:40:05 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Spahni <[email protected]> • #8961
Re: Best recent release of CRM114 for 64-bit Linuxenviornment?
Thu, 6 Nov 2008 13:13:49 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Spahni <[email protected]> • #8960
Best recent release of CRM114 for 64-bit Linux enviornment?
Thu, 6 Nov 2008 14:40:26 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #8959
Re: Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:45:37 +0200
"Ger Hobbelt" <[email protected]> • #8958
Re: Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:15:02 +0200
"Ger Hobbelt" <[email protected]> • #8957
Re: Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:53:56 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #8956
Re: Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:41:46 +0200
"Ger Hobbelt" <[email protected]> • #8955
Re: Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:23:36 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8954
Re: Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:45:40 -0700
"Robert Swirsky-Warner" <[email protected]> • #8953
Re: Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:35:45 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #8952
Re: Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:26:46 +0200
"Ger Hobbelt" <[email protected]> • #8951
Any way to tell what features contributed the most for a particular decision?
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:10:22 -0700
"Robert Swirsky-Warner" <[email protected]> • #8950
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.