gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel archive

390 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Problem compiling spfmilter
Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:34:09 +0200
DL - Joshue Martin <[email protected]> • #2061
Re: Problem compiling spfmilter
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:16:42 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood" <[email protected]> • #2060
Problem compiling spfmilter
Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:43:22 +0200
DL - Joshue Martin <[email protected]> • #2059
Re: jSPF 0.9.6 passing RFC 4408 test suite 2007.05; no more "reference implementations"!
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:40:24 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #2058
Re: SPF vulnerability
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:11:08 -0600
Boyd Lynn Gerber <[email protected]> • #2057
Re: SPF vulnerability
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:14:51 +0530 (IST)
karan pott <[email protected]> • #2056
Re: rash of crashes: likely patch included
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:17:29 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2055
rash of crashes: likely patch included
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:24:39 -0700
John Clements <[email protected]> • #2054
Re: SPF vulnerability
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:18:40 +0530 (IST)
karan pott <[email protected]> • #2053
Re: SPF vulnerability
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:16:44 +0530 (IST)
karan pott <[email protected]> • #2052
Re: SPF vulnerability
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:42:38 +0100
Shevek <[email protected]> • #2051
Re: SPF vulnerability
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:40:54 +0100
Shevek <[email protected]> • #2050
Re: SPF vulnerability
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:04:13 +0530 (IST)
karan pott <[email protected]> • #2049
Re: SPF vulnerability
Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:47:24 +0530 (IST)
karan pott <[email protected]> • #2048
Re: SPF vulnerability
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:33:52 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood" <[email protected]> • #2047
Re: SPF vulnerability
Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:23:54 +0530 (IST)
karan pott <[email protected]> • #2046
Re: SPF vulnerability
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 8:14:14 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2045
SPF vulnerability
Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:12:46 +0530 (IST)
karan pott <[email protected]> • #2044
netinet/in.h missing in spf2/spf.h
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:22:08 +0100
Mij <[email protected]> • #2043
Re: New version of spfmilter with libspf2-1.2.9
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:06:23 +0000 (GMT)
"G.W. Haywood" <[email protected]> • #2042
Re: New version of spfmilter with libspf2-1.2.9
Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:54:32 +0000
Shevek <[email protected]> • #2041
New version of spfmilter with libspf2-1.2.9
Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:45:03 +0000 (GMT)
"G.W. Haywood" <[email protected]> • #2040
Re: RT -- impossible to report bugs
Mon, 1 Dec 2008 16:45:56 +0100
Radoslaw Zielinski <[email protected]> • #2039
Re: RT -- impossible to report bugs
Mon, 1 Dec 2008 08:46:25 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2038
RT -- impossible to report bugs
Mon, 1 Dec 2008 13:00:19 +0100
Radoslaw Zielinski <[email protected]> • #2037
Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:31:34 +0000
Shevek <[email protected]> • #2036
Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?
Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:39:05 +0900
Hajimu UMEMOTO <[email protected]> • #2035
Re: include: result confusion?
Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:07:47 +0100
Hannah Schroeter <[email protected]> • #2034
Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?
Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:40:44 +0100
Hannah Schroeter <[email protected]> • #2033
Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?
Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:27:28 +0100
Hannah Schroeter <[email protected]> • #2032
Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?
Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:15:20 +0100
"Johann E. Klasek" <[email protected]> • #2031
Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?
Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:52:15 +0100
Hannah Schroeter <[email protected]> • #2030
Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:48:32 +0900
Hajimu UMEMOTO <[email protected]> • #2029
Re: Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:30:59 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2028
Fwd: [milter-greylist] HEADS-UP: libspf2 causes milter-greylist memory leak?
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:02:36 +0200
Fredrik Pettai <[email protected]> • #2027
Re: include: result confusion?
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:28:10 +0200
Hannah Schroeter <[email protected]> • #2026
Re: include: result confusion?
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:29:26 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2025
Re: include: result confusion?
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:59:43 +0200
Hannah Schroeter <[email protected]> • #2024
Re: include: result confusion?
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:46:30 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #2023
include: result confusion?
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:10:18 +0200
Hannah Schroeter <[email protected]> • #2022
Re: New libspf2 release
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:06:21 +0100
Shevek <[email protected]> • #2021
Re: [spf-discuss] Re: New libspf2 release
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:20:52 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #2020
Re: New libspf2 release
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:52:33 +0200
Hannah Schroeter <[email protected]> • #2019
Re: New libspf2 release
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:19:35 +0400
Eugene Crosser <[email protected]> • #2018
Re: [spf-devel] New libspf2 release
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:13:55 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2017
Re: [spf-devel] New libspf2 release
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:16:50 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2016
Re: New libspf2 release
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:54:44 +0100
Shevek <[email protected]> • #2015
Re: New libspf2 release
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:45:50 +0100
Shevek <[email protected]> • #2014
Re: New libspf2 release
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:34:52 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2013
Re: New libspf2 release
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:22:44 +0100
Shevek <[email protected]> • #2012
Re: New libspf2 release
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:25:33 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2011
Re: New libspf2 release
Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:10:07 +0400
Eugene Crosser <[email protected]> • #2010
Re: New libspf2 release
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:35:25 -0400
Jason Frisvold <[email protected]> • #2009
New libspf2 release
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:59:08 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2008
Re: Live-DNS testing infrastructure
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:28:18 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #2007
Re: Live-DNS testing infrastructure
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 11:10:44 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #2006
Re: Live-DNS testing infrastructure
Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:43:46 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #2005
Re: InterPC.SPF + test suite
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:10:44 +0200
"Frank Ellermann" <[email protected]> • #2004
Re: InterPC.SPF + test suite
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:59:58 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #2003
InterPC.SPF + test suite
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:52:07 +0200
"Frank Ellermann" <[email protected]> • #2002
Re: Re: Implementation certification procedure
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:13:25 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #2001
Re: jSPF 0.9.6 passing RFC 4408 test suite 2007.05; no more "reference implementations"!
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:53:05 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #2000
jSPF 0.9.6 passing RFC 4408 test suite 2007.05; no more "reference implementations"!
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:01:50 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1999
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:43:45 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1998
Re: Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:22:57 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1997
Re: Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:24:42 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #1996
Re: Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:12:17 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1995
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:44:43 +0200
"Frank Ellermann" <[email protected]> • #1994
Re: Live-DNS testing infrastructure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:41:24 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #1993
Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:35:39 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1992
Re: Live-DNS testing infrastructure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:15:07 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1991
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:00:34 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1990
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:26:25 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #1989
Re: Live-DNS testing infrastructure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:15:12 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1988
Re: Live-DNS testing infrastructure (was: Implementation certification procedure)
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:15:12 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #1987
Re: Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:26:11 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1986
Re: Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:10:44 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1985
Re: Live-DNS testing infrastructure (was: Implementation certification procedure)
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 8:09:46 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #1984
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:42:08 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1983
Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:00:00 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1982
Live-DNS testing infrastructure (was: Implementation certification procedure)
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:49:02 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1981
Re: Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:00:12 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1980
Re: Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:54:28 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1979
Re: Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:37:22 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1978
Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:39:40 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1977
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:17:15 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1976
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:00:08 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1975
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:30:54 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #1974
Re: Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:27:17 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1973
Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:06:58 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1972
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:47:33 -0600
Boyd Lynn Gerber <[email protected]> • #1971
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:26:34 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #1970
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:16:41 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #1969
Re: Implementation certification procedure
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:56:40 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1968
Implementation certification procedure
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:01:02 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #1967
Re: Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:26:42 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1966
Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:59:52 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1965
Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:47:02 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #1964
Re: Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:02:35 +0200
Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> • #1963
Re: Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:18:29 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #1962
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.