gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss archive

335 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: SPF and bouncing
Sat, 21 Apr 2012 03:37:27 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25114
Re: Forwarders' hopes, was SPF and bouncing
Sat, 21 Apr 2012 03:24:31 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25113
Re: Forwarders' hopes, was SPF and bouncing
Sat, 21 Apr 2012 03:22:52 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25112
Re: Forwarders' hopes, was SPF and bouncing
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:43:18 -0400
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25111
Re: Forwarders' hopes, was SPF and bouncing
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25110
Re: SPF and bouncing
Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25109
Nothing to be done for...
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:20:24 -0500 (CDT)
[email protected] • #25108
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:00:03 -0400
[email protected] • #25107
Re: SPF and bouncing
Thu, 12 Apr 2012 11:14:17 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25106
Re: SPF and bouncing
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 20:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25105
Re: SPF and bouncing
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:44:25 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25104
Re: SPF and bouncing
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25103
Re: Forwarders' hopes, was SPF and bouncing
Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:46:03 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25102
Re: Forwarders' hopes, was SPF and bouncing
Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:21:54 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #25101
Re: SPF and bouncing
Sun, 08 Apr 2012 23:42:43 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25100
Re: Forwarders' hopes, was SPF and bouncing
Sun, 08 Apr 2012 20:50:12 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25099
Forwarders' hopes, was SPF and bouncing
Sun, 08 Apr 2012 12:01:34 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #25098
Re: SPF and bouncing
Sun, 8 Apr 2012 00:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25097
Re: SPF and bouncing
Sat, 07 Apr 2012 16:27:46 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25096
Re: SPF and bouncing
Sat, 7 Apr 2012 07:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25095
Re: SPF and bouncing
Sat, 07 Apr 2012 14:03:56 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25094
Re: SPF and bouncing
Sat, 07 Apr 2012 13:48:50 +0200
Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> • #25093
Re: SPF and bouncing
Fri, 6 Apr 2012 21:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25092
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:00:03 -0400
[email protected] • #25091
RE: SPF and bouncing
Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:12:48 +0000
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25090
Re: SPF and bouncing
Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:25:26 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25089
Re: SPF and bouncing
Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:20:29 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25088
Re: SPF and bouncing
Fri, 6 Apr 2012 11:45:50 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood" <[email protected]> • #25087
Re: SPF and bouncing
Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25086
Re: SPF and bouncing
Fri, 06 Apr 2012 05:31:25 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25085
Re: SPF and bouncing
Thu, 5 Apr 2012 22:51:30 -0400
Sanford Whiteman <[email protected]> • #25084
Re: SPF and bouncing
Thu, 5 Apr 2012 19:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25083
Re: SPF and bouncing
Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:56:25 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25082
Re: SPF and bouncing
Wed, 4 Apr 2012 21:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25081
Re: SPF and bouncing
Thu, 05 Apr 2012 01:27:20 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25080
Re: SPF and bouncing
Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25079
Re: SPF and bouncing
Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:34:07 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25078
Re: SPF and bouncing
Wed, 4 Apr 2012 00:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25077
Re: SPF and bouncing
Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:48:33 +0100
alan <[email protected]> • #25076
Re: SPF and bouncing
Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:53:42 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart D Gathman <[email protected]> • #25075
Re: SPF and bouncing
Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25074
Re: SPF and bouncing
Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart D Gathman <[email protected]> • #25073
Re: SPF and bouncing
Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25072
Re: SPF and bouncing
Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:31:57 -0400 (EDT)
Stuart D Gathman <[email protected]> • #25071
SPF and bouncing
Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Michael Deutschmann <[email protected]> • #25070
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 31 Mar 2012 00:00:02 -0500
[email protected] • #25069
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:00:02 -0500
[email protected] • #25068
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:00:02 -0500
[email protected] • #25067
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:00:01 -0500
[email protected] • #25066
FW: [marf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-08.txt> (SPF Authentication Failure Reporting using the Abuse Report Format) to Proposed Standard
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:05:22 +0000
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25065
FYI: openspf.org working again
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:39:34 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #25064
Re: DMARC
Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:40:16 -0500
"HECTOR SANTOS" <[email protected]> • #25063
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:00:01 -0500
[email protected] • #25062
DMARC
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:23:29 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25061
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:39:54 -0500
[email protected] • #25060
Re: Review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting
Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:01:48 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25059
Re: Review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting
Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:19:28 -0500
Stuart D Gathman <[email protected]> • #25058
Review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting
Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:33:50 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25057
SPF Mail Summary Report
Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:55:44 -0500
[email protected] • #25056
libspf2 now managed on github
Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:03:45 -0800
Shevek <[email protected]> • #25055
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:19:26 -0500
[email protected] • #25054
Re: ipv6 and spf
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:36:41 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25053
Re: ipv6 and spf
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:30:02 +0100
Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> • #25052
Re: ipv6 and spf
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:27:26 +0100
Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> • #25051
Re: ipv6 and spf
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:13:33 +0000 (GMT)
"G.W. Haywood" <[email protected]> • #25050
Re: ipv6 and spf
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:45:54 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25049
ipv6 and spf
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:19:53 +0100
Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> • #25048
Re: MUA, MTA and SPF
Sat, 14 Jan 2012 04:33:33 -0500
Hector Santos <[email protected]> • #25047
SPF Mail Summary Report
Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:19:29 -0500
[email protected] • #25046
Re: MUA, MTA and SPF
Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:13:15 +0100
Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> • #25045
Re: MUA, MTA and SPF
Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:42:07 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25044
RE: MUA, MTA and SPF
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:33:12 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25043
MUA, MTA and SPF
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 12:22:59 -0800
"Jesus Duarte" <[email protected]> • #25042
FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-authres-spf-erratum-00.txt
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:46:12 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25041
List footer
Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:08:45 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25040
Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:13:46 -0500
Stuart D Gathman <[email protected]> • #25039
Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:35:37 -0500
Tim Draegen <[email protected]> • #25038
RE: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 23:00:08 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25037
Re: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:39:24 -0700
Commerco WebMaster <[email protected]> • #25036
Re: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 19:37:38 -0500
"HECTOR SANTOS" <[email protected]> • #25035
Re: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 16:36:04 -0700
Commerco WebMaster <[email protected]> • #25034
Re: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 11:25:24 -0600
"Brian G. Peterson" <[email protected]> • #25033
Re: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:29:54 -0500
"HECTOR SANTOS" <[email protected]> • #25032
RE: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 20:24:36 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25031
Re: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:12:29 -0500
"HECTOR SANTOS" <[email protected]> • #25030
Re: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 22:06:36 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25029
Re: Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:40:14 -0500
"HECTOR SANTOS" <[email protected]> • #25028
Fwd: Re: [spfbis] SPFBIS proposed charter
Thu, 01 Dec 2011 18:00:09 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25027
RE: Welcome to the "spfbis" mailing list
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:52:13 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25026
FW: Welcome to the "spfbis" mailing list
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:48:47 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25025
Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:03:34 +0100
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #25024
RE: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter
Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:46:08 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25023
Re: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:35:56 +0100
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #25022
FW: [apps-discuss] Proposed "spfbis" working group charter
Sun, 13 Nov 2011 21:48:01 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25021
FYI: SPFbis proposal
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:41:16 +0100
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #25020
Re: Re: Lists
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 20:46:53 +0100
Frank Ellermann <[email protected]> • #25019
RE: Re: Lists
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 10:39:47 -0800
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> • #25018
Re: Re: Lists
Mon, 07 Nov 2011 12:11:19 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #25017
Re: Re: Lists
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:58:32 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #25016
Re: Re: Lists
Mon, 07 Nov 2011 09:24:33 -0500 (EST)
Derek Diget <[email protected]> • #25015
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.