gmane.music.dadl.ot archive

7592 archived articles, newest first (page 52 of 76). Latest articles →

Re: Obama abdicates to Bill Clinton, lunacy
Mon, 13 Dec 2010 07:26:19 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69158
Re: Obama abdicates to Bill Clinton, lunacy
Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:23:16 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69157
The Magic Bullet
Mon, 13 Dec 2010 07:13:40 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69156
Obama abdicates to Bill Clinton, lunacy
Mon, 13 Dec 2010 07:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69155
Re: Obama Understands Economics in Spite of Himself
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:07:47 -0800
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #69154
Re: a vancouverite comments on the pat-downs
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:04:43 -0800
James <[email protected]> • #69153
Re: Obama Understands Economics in Spite of Himself
Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:38:44 -0600
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69152
Re: Obama Understands Economics in Spite of Himself
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:33:44 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69151
Re: Obama Understands Economics in Spite of Himself
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:44:53 -0800
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #69150
the top ten movies in north america
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:49:14 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69149
Re: Obama Understands Economics in Spite of Himself
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:39:07 -0600
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]> • #69148
Re: Obama Understands Economics in Spite of Himself
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:13:08 -0800
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #69147
Re: Obama Understands Economics in Spite of Himself
Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:51:31 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69146
Obama Understands Economics in Spite of Himself
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69145
Obama Congratulates China on Human Rights
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:42:58 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69144
Obama's Not-So-Very-Good Week
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:38:48 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69143
prophetic? (former dadl-ot'er will sulik posted this at facebook today)
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:29:06 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69142
Re: This is bizarre
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 07:29:26 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69141
Re: This is bizarre
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:22:03 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69140
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:16:53 -0500
[email protected] • #69139
Re: This is bizarre
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:15:19 -0500
[email protected] • #69138
Re: This is bizarre
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:12:06 -0500
[email protected] • #69137
Re: Julian Assange Captured by World's Dating Police
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:10:04 -0500
[email protected] • #69136
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 08:06:31 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69135
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:02:46 -0500
[email protected] • #69134
Re: Julian Assange Captured by World's Dating Police
Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:57:08 -0500
[email protected] • #69133
Re: This is bizarre
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:23:39 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69132
Re: White House Cabinet Member Suggested Killing an American Service Man to Justify War
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:16:19 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69131
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:14:52 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69130
Re: This is bizarre
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:48:53 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69129
Re: This is bizarre
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:06:28 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69128
Re: This is bizarre
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:40:16 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69127
Re: White House Cabinet Member Suggested Killing an American Service Man to Justify War
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:39:19 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69126
Re: This is bizarre
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:29:23 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69125
Re: Julian Assange Captured by World's Dating Police
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:26:08 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69124
Re: Julian Assange Captured by World's Dating Police
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:23:22 -0600
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]> • #69123
This is bizarre
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:20:46 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69122
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:15:46 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69121
White House Cabinet Member Suggested Killing an American Service Man to Justify War
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:13:17 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69120
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:03:49 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69119
Re: Julian Assange Captured by World's Dating Police
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:02:51 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69118
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:55:39 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69117
Julian Assange Captured by World's Dating Police
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:52:46 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69116
Super-Hero WikiLeaks: Diplomatic Cables From Your Favorite Comic Book Universes
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:17:14 -0500
[email protected] • #69115
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:08:27 -0500
[email protected] • #69114
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:05:31 -0500
[email protected] • #69113
Re: On the Set of Atlas Shrugged
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:23:42 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69112
On the Set of Atlas Shrugged
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:17:53 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69111
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:07:02 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69110
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:01:09 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69109
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:52:33 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69108
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:50:43 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69107
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:41:59 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69106
Re: Vanity Flair
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69105
Re: Vanity Flair
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:41:04 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69104
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:39:50 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69103
Re: Vanity Flair
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:38:25 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69102
Re: The major Wikileaks bombshell you never saw coming
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:36:52 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69101
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:31:20 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69100
From Audacity to Animosity
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:26:56 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69099
Vanity Flair
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:18:58 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69098
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:11:47 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69097
Packaging the Inception script a smart out-of-the-box strategy
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:01:48 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69096
Re: Roger Ebert at the height of his form
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:23:27 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69095
Irresistible TRON merch
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:17:44 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69094
Re: Roger Ebert at the height of his form
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:09:22 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69093
Re: The major Wikileaks bombshell you never saw coming
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:08:05 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69092
The major Wikileaks bombshell you never saw coming
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:00:07 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69091
Re: Roger Ebert at the height of his form
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:11:42 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69090
Re: Roger Ebert at the height of his form
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:56:24 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69089
Roger Ebert at the height of his form
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:47:06 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69088
Re: The Changing Culture War
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:07:57 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69087
More great music upcoming in 2011
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:47:31 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69086
This Is What Happens When You Get Engulfed by a Wave
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:22:12 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69085
The Changing Culture War
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:41:49 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69084
Re: Opera
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 22:23:35 -0500
The Voice Of Objective Truth <vox-TPv+D/[email protected]> • #69083
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:36:53 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69082
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:12 -0600
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]> • #69081
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:53:43 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69080
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:41:48 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69079
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:40:56 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69078
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:36:24 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69077
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:18:05 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69076
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:00:27 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69075
Re: skype
Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:53:14 -0500
[email protected] • #69074
Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
Thu, 09 Dec 2010 17:47:20 -0500
[email protected] • #69073
Re: Opera
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:39:20 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69072
Re: Opera
Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:07:46 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69071
Re: Hackers Attack Those Seen as WikiLeaks Enemies
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:41:34 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69070
Re: Hackers Attack Those Seen as WikiLeaks Enemies
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:37:00 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69069
Re: Hackers Attack Those Seen as WikiLeaks Enemies
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:29:10 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69068
Re: Hackers Attack Those Seen as WikiLeaks Enemies
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:24:09 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69067
Re: Hackers Attack Those Seen as WikiLeaks Enemies
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:43:25 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69066
Re: Whatever they want to do...
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:42:47 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69065
Opera
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:40:45 -0600
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #69064
Re: Whatever they want to do...
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:01:12 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69063
Re: Whatever they want to do...
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 12:58:38 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69062
Whatever they want to do...
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69061
Re: will obama *not* be nominated for re-election in 2012?
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:00:09 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69060
Re: will obama *not* be nominated for re-election in 2012?
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:36:33 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69059
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.