gmane.network.djbdns archive

Re: DNSCurve implementation

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:04:42 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14385

Re: DNSCurve implementation

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:10:49 -0500

Brian <[email protected]> • #14384

Re: DNSCurve implementation

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:30:38 +0000

Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14383

Re: DNSCurve implementation

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:35:35 -0500

Brian <[email protected]> • #14382

DNSCurve implementation

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:56:16 +0000

Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14381

Re: Over 255 character SPF record with TinyDNS/djbdns

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:26:39 -0500 (EST)

Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14380

Re: Over 255 character SPF record with TinyDNS/djbdns

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:38:30 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14379

Over 255 character SPF record with TinyDNS/djbdns

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:41:39 -0600

<[email protected]> • #14378

ping from a Windows client desktop doesn't resolve

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:57:33 -0500

cr lankis <[email protected]> • #14377

Re: ping from a Windows client desktop doesn't resolve

Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:26:17 +1030

Daryl Tester <[email protected]> • #14376

Re: ping from a Windows client desktop doesn't resolve

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:11:58 +0900

Bernd Plagge <[email protected]> • #14375

Re: ping from a Windows client desktop doesn't resolve

Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:46:03 +1300

Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #14374

Re: ping from a Windows client desktop doesn't resolve

Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:05:31 +1030

Daryl Tester <[email protected]> • #14373

Re: ping from a Windows client desktop doesn't resolve

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:14:25 -0500

Brian Reichert <[email protected]> • #14372

Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:27:16 -0600

David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14371

Justifying The Use Of Large Caches - Was: Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:56:44 +0000

Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]> • #14370

Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:17:24 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14369

RE: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:44:08 +0100

[email protected] • #14368

Shared Info: was Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:24:19 -0500 (EST)

Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14367

RE: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:00:51 -0500 (EST)

Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14366

Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:11:30 -0600

Kevin <[email protected]> • #14365

Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:00:49 -0600

David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14364

Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:05:24 +0300

Sergey Shepelev <[email protected]> • #14363

Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:55:18 -0500

Joe Baptista <[email protected]> • #14362

Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:27:16 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14361

Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:36:25 -0500

Brian <[email protected]> • #14360

Re: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:16:37 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14359

RE: anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:13:33 -0500

Mike Sands <[email protected]> • #14358

anyone know what powers "google public DNS?"

Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:10:04 -0600

David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14357

Re: BIND named(8) cache poisoning with DNSSEC validation

Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:30:20 -0500 (EST)

Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14356

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:18:38 -0700

Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14355

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:13:47 -0700

Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14354

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:05:50 -0700

Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14353

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:10:13 -0700

Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14352

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:43:41 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14351

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:07:38 +1030

Daryl Tester <[email protected]> • #14350

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:25:27 +0000

Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14349

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:28:01 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14348

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:15:13 +1030

Daryl Tester <[email protected]> • #14347

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:49:07 -0500

[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #14346

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:01:15 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14345

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:24:20 +1030

Daryl Tester <[email protected]> • #14344

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:56:12 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14343

srv records

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:57:17 -0500

Mike Sands <[email protected]> • #14342

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:15:10 +0000

James Sutherland <[email protected]> • #14341

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:54:32 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14340

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:02:13 -0800 (PST)

Joseph Tam <[email protected]> • #14339

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:17:30 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14338

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:53:35 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14337

Re: difference in dnscache installs

Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:45:29 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14336

AXFR not working with AAAA records

Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:27:46 +0100

KeKeSeB <[email protected]> • #14335

difference in dnscache installs

Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:02:19 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14334

Re: 64-bit dnscache, anyone?

Fri, 8 Jan 2010 20:18:41 -0600

Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14333

Re: 64-bit dnscache, anyone?

Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:33:07 -0500

Jeremy Kister <[email protected]> • #14332

64-bit dnscache, anyone?

Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:56:39 -0600

Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14331

Re: dnscurve updates

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:35:32 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14330

Re: dnscurve updates

Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:04:13 -0700

Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14329

Re: dnscurve updates

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:34:39 -0600

Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14328

Re: dnscurve updates

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:05:42 -0600

Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14327

Re: dnscurve updates

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 19:30:56 -0600

Simon Casady <[email protected]> • #14326

Re: TXT record fragments with tinydns-data

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:52:02 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14325

TXT record fragments with tinydns-data

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:37:44 -0800

Ask Bjørn Hansen <[email protected]> • #14324

Re: dnscurve updates

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:56:50 -0600

David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14323

Re: dnscurve updates

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:14:24 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14322

Re: dnscurve updates

Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:01:15 -0700

Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14321

BIND named(8) cache poisoning with DNSSEC validation

Thu, 7 Jan 2010 01:46:54 +0100

[email protected] • #14320

Re: more than 8 answers

Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:18:20 +0100

Alejandro Mery <[email protected]> • #14319

Re: more than 8 answers

Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:46:54 +0200

Mircea Hutanu <[email protected]> • #14318

Re: more than 8 answers

Wed, 6 Jan 2010 07:38:28 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14317

more than 8 answers

Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:25:08 +0200

Mircea Hutanu <[email protected]> • #14316

Re: anyone generating location-specific tinydns values?

Sun, 03 Jan 2010 09:59:21 +1300

Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #14315

Re: anyone generating location-specific tinydns values?

Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:00:07 +0100

Philip Jocks <[email protected]> • #14314

Re: anyone generating location-specific tinydns values?

Sat, 2 Jan 2010 12:48:19 +0000

James Sutherland <[email protected]> • #14313

Re: anyone generating location-specific tinydns values?

Sat, 2 Jan 2010 13:03:00 +0100

Alejandro Mery <[email protected]> • #14312

anyone generating location-specific tinydns values?

Sat, 02 Jan 2010 16:46:20 +1300

Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #14311

IPv6 Listening Sockets

Fri, 25 Dec 2009 02:13:54 +0000

Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]> • #14310

FBI Washington Field Office

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:14:43 -0800

"FBI Headquarters"<[email protected]> • #14309

RE: dnscache/dnsq timeouts on RCODE=5(refused)

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:34:54 -0800 (PST)

Joseph Tam <[email protected]> • #14308

Re: Non-existent zone file

Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:11:21 +0100

Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #14307

Re: [OT: DNSCurve] Resolvers w/o key -> HMAC Proposal

Sat, 12 Dec 2009 18:15:43 +0100

Erwin Hoffmann <[email protected]> • #14306

Elegance has a home √ our watches live the re.

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:44:52 +0800

"Cory Howe" <[email protected]> • #14305

Re: aaaa records

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:17:38 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14304

Re: aaaa records

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:07:02 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14303

aaaa records

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:05:56 +0100

richard lucassen <[email protected]> • #14302

Re: Non-existent zone file

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:59:56 -0800

Paul Theodoropoulos <[email protected]> • #14301

Re: Non-existent zone file

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:28:42 +0100

Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #14300

Re: Non-existent zone file

Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:39:23 -0600

Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14299

Re: [OT: DNSCurve] Resolvers w/o key -> HMAC Proposal

Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:04:18 -0800

Michael Sierchio <[email protected]> • #14298

Re: [OT: DNSCurve] Resolvers w/o key -> HMAC Proposal

Sun, 6 Dec 2009 10:44:52 -0800

Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14297

Re: [OT: DNSCurve] Resolvers w/o key -> HMAC Proposal

Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:43:41 -0800

Michael Sierchio <[email protected]> • #14296

[OT: DNSCurve] Resolvers w/o key -> HMAC Proposal

Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:43:42 +0100

Erwin Hoffmann <[email protected]> • #14295

Re: Non-existent zone file

Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:21:35 +0200

Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #14294

Re: Non-existent zone file

Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:23:09 +0100

Jakob Hirsch <[email protected]> • #14293

Re: Non-existent zone file

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:59:05 -0600

Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14292

Re: Non-existent zone file

Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:16:04 -0800

Paul Theodoropoulos <[email protected]> • #14291

Re: Non-existent zone file

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:24:25 -0500

Rich Rumble <[email protected]> • #14290

Re: Non-existent zone file

3 Dec 2009 11:36:55 -0600

"Charles Cazabon" <[email protected]> • #14289

Non-existent zone file

Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:01:05 -0500

Rich Rumble <[email protected]> • #14288

Re: Bug, well not really but could be?

Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:24:18 -0600

Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14287

Re: Bug, well not really but could be?

Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:28:12 +1030

Daryl Tester <[email protected]> • #14286