gmane.network.freeswan.devel archive
391 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →
????????????????
Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:19:35 +0800ipsec can not start
Fri, 14 Mar 2003 19:29:27 +0800nit in headers
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 20:11:34 -0500 (EST)Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:04:44 -0800 (PST)Re: snapshot with new OE behavior
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:45:02 +0100 (MET)Re: a question about x509cert exchange
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:50:27 +0100a question about x509cert
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:29:14 +0800snapshot with new OE behavior
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 06:09:33 -0500 (EST)Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 04:40:47 -0500 (EST)a question about x509cert exchange
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:59:29 +0800Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:03:54 -0800Re: how to get differing DNS results
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:33:40 -0800Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:38:24 -0500 (EST)Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:57:36 -0500 (EST)Re: pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown)
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:08:58 -0500 (EST)Re: pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown)
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:52:01 -0500adding POLICY_* bits to Pluto [was Re: [Users] (no subject)]
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:56:46 -0500 (EST)Re: mast(4)
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:50:15 -0500 (EST)Re: pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown)
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:11:07 -0500 (EST)Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:39:22 +0100 (MET)Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:06:32 -0500 (EST)Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:39:19 -0500Re: how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 10:13:41 -0500Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:24:01 +0100 (MET)Re: how to get differing DNS results
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:06:47 +0100 (MET)Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 07:51:09 -0500 (EST)Re: letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 03:27:41 -0500 (EST)Re: self-KEY check
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 03:31:20 -0500 (EST)Re: plutostderrlog=
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:41:08 -0500self-KEY check
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:58:29 -0800how to get differing DNS results
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:09:54 -0500SNAT and OE
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:32:38 -0800Re: how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:27:05 +0100lookup of self-TXT/KEY
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:42:30 -0500Re: lookup of self-TXT/KEY
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:12:27 -0500 (EST)what will happen when to execute command line "ipsec auto --up "?
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:06:28 +0800Re: [Users] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:32:37 -0600Re: [Users] how FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:53:35 -0500(no subject)
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:45:26 METhow FS is supposed to deal with problems further down the stack
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:12:27 +0100letting traffic flow through a SG by default
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:03:22 -0500 (EST)(no subject)
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:45:26 METRe: [Design] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems
Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:24:50 -0800Re: [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems
Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:24:50 -0800Re: plutostderrlog=
Sun, 9 Mar 2003 20:22:43 -0500 (EST)plutostderrlog=
Sun, 09 Mar 2003 15:52:21 -0500Re: [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems
Sun, 09 Mar 2003 16:15:33 -0500Re: [Design] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems
Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:23:32 -0800Re: [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems
Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:23:32 -0800Re: [Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems
Sun, 09 Mar 2003 10:57:10 -0500temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 20:04:19 -0800[Users] temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 20:04:19 -0800ipsec auto --status now shows debug settings
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 17:07:37 -0500 (EST)temporary wild-side problems cause long-term conn problems
Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:27:01 -0500Re: freeswan and sharp pda
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 11:37:14 -0500 (EST)freeswan and sharp pda
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:51:05 +0530tests not run by make check
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 04:45:38 -0500 (EST)Re: a review of make check output
Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:05:02 -0500ICMP processing relevant to IPSEC
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:41:46 +0530 (IST)a review of make check output
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 22:47:20 -0500 (EST)Re: best uml patch
Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:31:51 -0500Sam's concerns about 2.00
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:36:51 -0500 (EST)interaction between confread and pluto
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:25:16 METinteraction between confread and pluto
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:25:16 METHow does pluto read ipsec.conf options?
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:03:23 METRe: How does pluto read ipsec.conf options?
Thu, 06 Mar 2003 13:07:37 +0100How does pluto read ipsec.conf options?
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 12:03:23 METbest uml patch
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 03:50:19 -0500 (EST)ipsec verify fix
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:05:57 -0500 (EST)Re: Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 14:44:58 -0800 (PST)pluto now checks our sides DNS credentials for Opportunism
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 17:46:16 -0500 (EST)Re: [Users] error status 139
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 23:11:48 +0100 (CET)Re: Feature request: ipsec showhostkey --reverse
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:54:01 -0500 (EST)Re: Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:33:08 -0500Feature request: ipsec showhostkey --reverse
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:08:10 -0500Simplifying OE troubleshooting
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 15:45:53 -0500Re: multiple ipsec.secrets entries
Wed, 05 Mar 2003 19:14:54 +0100Re: multiple ipsec.secrets entries
Wed, 05 Mar 2003 12:46:31 -0500ipsec.conf(5): finish updating to special keyingtries value %forever
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:30:10 -0500 (EST)Re: Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:33:04 -0500Re: Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:19:20 -0500Re: Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:00:49 -0500Re: Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 14:46:59 -0500Re: Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:26:20 +0100 (MET)Re: Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 11:31:03 -0500Making KLIPS 1 asynchronous to support H/W crypto
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:44:06 +0100 (CET)Re: Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 08:17:54 -0500Re: Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 14:31:38 +0100Re: Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:46:18 +0100FreeS/WAN graphical configurator (was: Making FreeS/WAN harder to use)
03 Mar 2003 05:49:24 -0500Re: Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:32:32 +0100 (MET)Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:25:27 -0500 (EST)Re: Re: [Users] multiple ipsec.secrets entries
Sun, 02 Mar 2003 19:17:52 -0500Re: [Users] Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Sun, 02 Mar 2003 05:01:53 -0500Re: Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 22:58:17 -0500 (EST)Making FreeS/WAN harder to use, INTENTIONALLY.
Sat, 01 Mar 2003 18:41:47 -0800Re: [Design] Re: multiple ipsec.secrets entries
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 12:33:57 +0100Re: [Design] Re: multiple ipsec.secrets entries
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:57:42 +0100pluto not responding -- possibly not re-entrant (updown)
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:42:17 -0500Docs to pull up
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:12:56 -0500
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.