perl.bootstrap archive

386 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:47:06 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (Andy Dougherty) • #1112
RFC voting ?!!
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:49:56 +0100
[email protected] ("raptor") • #1111
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Mon, 7 Aug 2000 06:47:03 -0400
[email protected] ("Grant M.") • #1110
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
Sat, 05 Aug 2000 22:01:12 -0400
[email protected] (Matthew Persico) • #1109
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 18:03:35 +0100
[email protected] (Greg McCarroll) • #1108
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Sat, 05 Aug 2000 18:04:31 +0200
[email protected] ("H.Merijn Brand") • #1107
Re: RFC 10 (v2) Filehandles should use C<*> as a type pr
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 09:52:48 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #1106
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Sat, 05 Aug 2000 15:28:24 +0100
[email protected] (Mike Guy) • #1105
Re: Categorise RFCs on dev.perl.org
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 00:24:07 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1104
Re: RFC 10 (v2) Filehandles should use C<*> as a type pr
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 00:19:42 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1103
Categorise RFCs on dev.perl.org
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 16:13:30 +1000
[email protected] • #1102
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 15:23:54 +1000
[email protected] • #1101
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 15:22:19 +1000
[email protected] • #1100
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:58:23 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #1099
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 08:14:43 +0900
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #1098
Re: ffcall GPL -> LGPL
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:44:24 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1097
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 18:13:35 -0400
[email protected] (Ajit Deshpande) • #1096
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 15:36:08 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1095
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 17:30:43 -0400
[email protected] (Ajit Deshpande) • #1094
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 15:01:27 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1093
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:31:42 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #1092
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 15:23:56 -0400
[email protected] (Ted Ashton) • #1091
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 14:26:44 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #1090
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 04 Aug 2000 15:13:48 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1089
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
04 Aug 2000 15:04:29 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1088
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 03:49:28 +1000
[email protected] • #1087
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Larry Wall) • #1086
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
Fri, 04 Aug 2000 18:23:40 +0100
[email protected] (Alan Burlison) • #1085
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:13:21 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1084
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 04 Aug 2000 12:10:49 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1083
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:09:12 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #1082
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Sat, 5 Aug 2000 00:55:35 +0900
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #1081
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 09:44:32 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1080
Re: Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 10:33:58 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #1079
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:00:35 +0100
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) • #1078
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
04 Aug 2000 08:52:43 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1077
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 06:31:32 -0400
[email protected] ("Grant M.") • #1076
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
Fri, 04 Aug 2000 10:39:18 +0100
[email protected] (Alan Burlison) • #1075
Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 12:05:18 +0100
[email protected] ("raptor") • #1074
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 01:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #1073
Perl 6 project plan / roadmap
Fri, 4 Aug 2000 16:24:47 +1000
[email protected] • #1072
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:53:12 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #1071
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 23:48:09 -0400
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #1070
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:39:08 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #1069
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 23:38:22 -0400
[email protected] (Matthew Persico) • #1068
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
Fri, 04 Aug 2000 03:25:06 +0100
[email protected] (Hugo) • #1067
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 23:22:21 -0400
[email protected] ("Stephen P. Potter") • #1066
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 22:15:43 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #1065
Re: perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 19:56:28 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #1064
perl6-all - Duplicate elimination
03 Aug 2000 22:51:42 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1063
This is SO COOL!
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 20:14:27 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (John Tobey) • #1062
How to change the process, was Re: What is on-topic for bootstrap?
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 18:58:21 -0500
[email protected] ("J. David Blackstone") • #1061
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 16:36:09 -0600
[email protected] (Alan Young) • #1060
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 15:55:27 -0400
[email protected] (Ted Ashton) • #1059
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 14:58:18 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #1058
Re: Recording what we decided *not* to do, and why
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 15:45:41 -0400
[email protected] (Buddha Buck) • #1057
Re: RFCs: two proposals for change
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 15:33:34 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1056
Re: Integrity of RFCs (was RFC 7 (v1) Higher resolution time values)
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:23:22 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1055
RFCs: two proposals for change
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:13:45 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1054
Re: perl6-stdlib
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 11:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #1053
perl6-stdlib
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 12:13:00 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #1052
Re: s/RFC/PCR/
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 10:17:49 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1051
Re: s/RFC/PCR/
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 23:06:49 +1000
[email protected] • #1050
Re: s/RFC/PCR/
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 06:54:34 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #1049
Re: s/RFC/PCR/
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 13:49:16 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #1048
s/RFC/PCR/
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 06:43:57 -0600
[email protected] (Tom Christiansen) • #1047
Integrity of RFCs (was RFC 7 (v1) Higher resolution time values)
Thu, 03 Aug 2000 12:23:05 +0100
[email protected] (Hugo) • #1046
RFC 13 (v1) Creation of Copyright and Licensing Work
3 Aug 2000 04:09:46 -0000
[email protected] (Perl6 RFC Librarian) • #1045
Re: ZDNet article on Perl 6
Thu, 3 Aug 2000 00:58:55 +0100
[email protected] (Michael Stevens) • #1044
[Repost] RFC: Creation of Copyright and Licensing Working Group
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:14:00 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #1043
Software Development Times
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 16:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] (brian d foy) • #1042
Re: dates anyone?
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:17:22 -0400
[email protected] (Tad McClellan) • #1041
Re: FUBAR
Wed, 02 Aug 2000 13:35:00 -0600
[email protected] (Alan Young) • #1040
New mailing list: perl6-build
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:20:50 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1039
Re: What is on-topic for bootstrap?
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:35:19 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1038
better subjects (was Re: what will be in Perl6 ?)
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:16:23 -0400
[email protected] (Uri Guttman) • #1037
forking off sublists
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:29:50 -0400
[email protected] (Uri Guttman) • #1036
Re: dates anyone?
Wed, 02 Aug 2000 10:29:41 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1035
Re: What is on-topic for bootstrap?
02 Aug 2000 09:33:15 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1034
Re: ezmlm @ perl.org having issues?
02 Aug 2000 09:23:41 -0400
[email protected] (Chaim Frenkel) • #1033
Re: new mailing list: [email protected]
02 Aug 2000 14:11:49 +0100
[email protected] (Piers Cawley) • #1032
Re: new mailing list: [email protected]
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:39:20 +0100
[email protected] (Graham Barr) • #1031
Re: What is on-topic for bootstrap?
Wed, 02 Aug 2000 11:02:49 +0100
[email protected] (Hugo) • #1030
Re: new mailing list: [email protected]
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 10:43:43 +0100
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) • #1029
RFC: Creation of Copyright and Licensing Working Group
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 03:54:30 -0400
[email protected] ("SETI@Home Boycott") • #1028
Re: RFCs
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 00:55:48 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1027
GPL issues and creation of licensing working group (was Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: External API's: XS, Pickle, Win32::API, FFI, C::DynaLib etc.)
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 02:54:19 -0400
[email protected] ("Bradley M. Kuhn") • #1026
Re: dates anyone?
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 00:40:38 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1025
Re: new mailing list: [email protected]
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 00:39:09 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1024
Re: new mailing list: [email protected]
Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #1023
new mailing list: [email protected]
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 00:31:30 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1022
Your Chair: Kirrily Robert
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 00:21:21 -0600 (MDT)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #1021
Re: perl 6 requirements
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 00:56:34 -0400
[email protected] (Ted Ashton) • #1020
Re: dates anyone?
Wed, 2 Aug 2000 13:39:51 +0900
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #1019
Re: (lack of) RFCs
Wed, 02 Aug 2000 00:28:00 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1018
Re: dates anyone?
Wed, 02 Aug 2000 00:09:44 -0400
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #1017
(lack of) RFCs
Tue, 1 Aug 2000 23:25:21 -0500
[email protected] (Jonathan Scott Duff) • #1016
dates anyone?
Tue, 1 Aug 2000 22:59:08 -0500
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #1015
Re: perl 6 requirements
Tue, 01 Aug 2000 21:36:39 -0400
[email protected] (Matthew Persico) • #1014
Re: ezmlm @ perl.org having issues?
Tue, 01 Aug 2000 21:22:10 -0400
[email protected] (Mark-Jason Dominus) • #1013
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.