gmane.comp.java.sun.kvm archive

Unable to retrive data from any webservice-- using KSoap2

Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:06:48 -0600

SUBSCRIBE KVM-INTEREST Anonymous <[email protected]> • #10106

Re: SMS mobile

Sat, 5 Apr 2008 05:18:15 PST

[email protected] • #10105

J2ME for Palm OS

Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:12:47 PST

[email protected] • #10104

Re: SMS mobile

Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:42:45 PST

[email protected] • #10103

Re: SMS mobile

Fri, 4 Apr 2008 06:29:41 PST

[email protected] • #10102

Re: SMS mobile

Fri, 4 Apr 2008 05:50:56 PST

[email protected] • #10101

Re: SMS mobile

Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:57:23 -0500

Hartti Suomela <[email protected]> • #10100

Re: SMS mobile

Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:01:03 PST

[email protected] • #10099

Re: SMS mobile

Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:19:16 -0500

Hartti Suomela <[email protected]> • #10098

Re: SMS mobile

Thu, 3 Apr 2008 05:05:47 PST

[email protected] • #10097

Re: SMS mobile

Thu, 3 Apr 2008 05:03:16 -0600

Eric Donovan <[email protected]> • #10096

introduction

Wed, 2 Apr 2008 23:53:48 -0700

Adithya Yonathan <[email protected]> • #10095

SMS mobile

Wed, 2 Apr 2008 06:38:45 PST

[email protected] • #10094

Re: Unable to send protected objects??

Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:44:30 -0500

Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> • #10093

Re: Unable to send protected objects??

Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:41:42 PST

[email protected] • #10092

Re: Unable to send protected objects??

Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:04:59 PST

[email protected] • #10091

Re: Unable to send protected objects??

Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:43:24 PST

[email protected] • #10090

Re: anyone help me.. boxing game using cellular phone; bluetooth - user vs

Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:19:17 PST

[email protected] • #10089

anyone help me.. boxing game using cellular phone; bluetooth - user vs user

Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:15:49 PST

[email protected] • #10088

Re: Packet size

Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:14:15 PST

[email protected] • #10087

Packet size

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 04:03:00 PST

[email protected] • #10086

Problemas cenario_Jogo

Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:47:28 PST

[email protected] • #10085

Re: Is NetBeans Mobility still the right choice?

Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:46:13 PST

[email protected] • #10084

Re: Is NetBeans Mobility still the right choice?

Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:21:18 PST

[email protected] • #10083

Re: Is NetBeans Mobility still the right choice?

Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:50:15 PST

[email protected] • #10082

Is NetBeans Mobility still the right choice?

Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:42:42 PST

[email protected] • #10081

Re: jsr 135

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:12:05 PST

[email protected] • #10080

Re: Passing Parameter

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:41:09 PST

[email protected] • #10079

Re: jsr 135

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:01:56 PST

[email protected] • #10078

Re: Passing Parameter

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:00:57 PST

[email protected] • #10077

Passing Parameter

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:43:29 PST

[email protected] • #10076

Re: jsr 135

Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:31:41 PST

[email protected] • #10075

Re: jsr 135

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:24:08 PST

[email protected] • #10074

jsr 135

Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:31:11 PST

[email protected] • #10073

Re: Java Goldmine on line

Wed, 5 Mar 2008 00:59:19 PST

[email protected] • #10072

Re: Java Goldmine on line

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 23:34:26 PST

[email protected] • #10071

Wanted- Lead Handset Architect, Silicon Valley

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 16:49:08 PST

[email protected] • #10070

Java Goldmine on line

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:09:31 PST

[email protected] • #10069

AUTO: Ken Walker is vacationing somewhere warm (returning 03/17/2008)

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:01:39 -0500

Ken Walker <[email protected]> • #10068

Re: J2ME manifest specification?

Tue, 4 Mar 2008 02:59:39 -0600

Hartti Suomela <[email protected]> • #10067

J2ME manifest specification?

Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:28:26 PST

[email protected] • #10066

Re: How much RAM would a typical Form object use up?

Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:08:03 PST

[email protected] • #10065

Re: How much RAM would a typical Form object use up?

Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:21:21 PST

[email protected] • #10064

Re: How much RAM would a typical Form object use up?

Sat, 1 Mar 2008 03:04:01 PST

[email protected] • #10063

Re: How much RAM would a typical Form object use up?

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:53:25 PST

[email protected] • #10062

How much RAM would a typical Form object use up?

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:58:57 PST

[email protected] • #10061

Re: Array Issues with J2ME

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:34:23 PST

[email protected] • #10060

Re: Using SVG in J2ME

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:32:28 +0800

dingbig <[email protected]> • #10059

Re: Graphics.drawImage() vs Graphics.drawRGB()

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:13:30 PST

[email protected] • #10058

Re: Recommendations for SonyEricsson MSA-compliant phones

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:04:58 PST

[email protected] • #10057

Re: Windows CE in WTK

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:16:17 PST

[email protected] • #10056

Re: Windows CE in WTK

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:07:27 PST

[email protected] • #10055

Windows CE in WTK

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:20:19 PST

[email protected] • #10054

Daring Java Conference: Java to Celebrate Its 13th Birthday at Bangalore

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 02:05:17 PST

[email protected] • #10053

&#191;La inflaci&#243;n y los cursos de las divisas destruyen sus econom&#237;as? Sabemos como luchar contra eso.

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 04:49:37 -0500

kvm <[email protected]> • #10052

CDC Implementation for Windows Mobile 5?

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:46:23 PST

[email protected] • #10051

Re: Java and Bluetooth

Wed, 30 Jan 2008 07:52:15 PST

[email protected] • #10050

Java and Bluetooth

Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:09:26 PST

[email protected] • #10049

Re: Graphics.drawImage() vs Graphics.drawRGB()

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:44:39 PST

[email protected] • #10048

Re: BigInteger Problems

Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:41:10 -0700

SUBSCRIBE KVM-INTEREST satyarajasekhar <[email protected]> • #10047

Re: Array Issues with J2ME

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:56:06 -0700

"Padilla, Alex D" <[email protected]> • #10046

Re: Array Issues with J2ME

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:41:00 +0000

Robin Chaddock <[email protected]> • #10045

Array Issues with J2ME

Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:19:28 -0700

"Padilla, Alex D" <[email protected]> • #10044

Re: Manufacturer signing A MAJOR PRPBLEM

Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:10:40 -0000

Chris B <[email protected]> • #10043

Re: Manufacturer signing A MAJOR PRPBLEM

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:45:11 -0500

Jliss-Viewsonics <[email protected]> • #10042

Re: Manufacturer signing

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:30:29 -0800

Joe Bowbeer <[email protected]> • #10041

Re: Manufacturer signing

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:30:28 -0600

Hartti Suomela <[email protected]> • #10040

Re: Manufacturer signing

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:03:19 -0800

Randal Juliano <[email protected]> • #10039

Re: Manufacturer signing

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:31:57 -0600

Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> • #10038

Manufacturer signing

Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:23:20 -0800

Randal Juliano <[email protected]> • #10037

Re: BigInteger Problems

Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:33:25 PST

[email protected] • #10036

Re: BigInteger Problems

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:08:10 -0800

Joe Bowbeer <[email protected]> • #10035

Re: BigInteger Problems

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:20:58 -0700

"Padilla, Alex D" <[email protected]> • #10034

Re: BigInteger Problems

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:15:36 -0800

Joe Bowbeer <[email protected]> • #10033

BigInteger Problems

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:37:48 -0700

"Padilla, Alex D" <[email protected]> • #10032

above post is spam.

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:00:59 PST

[email protected] • #10031

Le invito a trabajar en una gran compa&#241;&#237;a concesionaria de autom&#243;viles.

Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:59:49 +0100

kvminterest <[email protected]> • #10030

Re: Graphics.drawImage() vs Graphics.drawRGB()

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 17:11:41 +0000

James Closs <[email protected]> • #10029

Re: Graphics.drawImage() vs Graphics.drawRGB()

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:15:03 -0000

Robin Chaddock <[email protected]> • #10028

Re: Graphics.drawImage() vs Graphics.drawRGB()

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:54:29 +0000

Elliot Sumner <[email protected]> • #10027

Re: Graphics.drawImage() vs Graphics.drawRGB()

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:39:19 +0000

James Closs <[email protected]> • #10026

Re: Graphics.drawImage() vs Graphics.drawRGB()

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:47:23 -0000

Robin Chaddock <[email protected]> • #10025

Graphics.drawImage() vs Graphics.drawRGB()

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:38:06 +0000

James Closs <[email protected]> • #10024

Re: Unable to send protected objects??

Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:50:40 PST

[email protected] • #10023

Le invito a trabajar en una gran compa&#241;&#237;a concesionaria de coches.

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:09:07 -0700

kvminterest <[email protected]> • #10022

Re: Unable to send protected objects??

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:44:22 -0600

Hartti Suomela <[email protected]> • #10021

Unable to send protected objects??

Wed, 9 Jan 2008 08:17:12 PST

[email protected] • #10020

Recommendations for SonyEricsson MSA-compliant phones

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:58:49 PST

[email protected] • #10019

J2MEForums.com Issues

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:10:00 +0000

kbateman <[email protected]> • #10018

Re: Is j2meforums dead?

Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:10:10 +0000

kbateman <[email protected]> • #10017

Re: Is j2meforums dead?

Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:20:45 PST

[email protected] • #10016

Re: Java Virtual Machine Statistics Monitoring Tool on Java ME

Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:21:34 PST

[email protected] • #10015

Re: Java Virtual Machine Statistics Monitoring Tool on Java ME

Sun, 6 Jan 2008 18:20:51 PST

[email protected] • #10014

Re: invalid flag

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 15:41:22 PST

[email protected] • #10013

Re: invalid flag

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:32:33 +0100

Richard Gregor <[email protected]> • #10012

Re: Incorrect result by Emulators of WTK

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:32:12 +0100

Hjelmslund Electronics <[email protected]> • #10011

Re: Incorrect result by Emulators of WTK

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:22:00 +0100

Richard Gregor <[email protected]> • #10010

invalid flag

Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:30:02 PST

[email protected] • #10009

Re: Is j2meforums dead?

Tue, 1 Jan 2008 21:23:53 PST

[email protected] • #10008

Re: Incorrect result by Emulators of WTK

Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:52:52 PST

[email protected] • #10007