gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.foundation archive

725 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 8). Latest articles →

RE: Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:52:49 +0100
[email protected] • #1037
Re: Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:42:32 -0500
"Gary Fisher" <[email protected]> • #1036
RE: Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:39:36 +0100
[email protected] • #1035
RE: Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:22:57 +0200
"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> • #1034
Re: Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 19:23:59 -0800
Ted Kaehler <[email protected]> • #1033
Re: Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Tue, 01 Apr 2003 23:42:41 +0200
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #1032
Re: Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:23:24 -0800
Ted Kaehler <[email protected]> • #1031
Re: Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:36:03 -0800
Ned Konz <[email protected]> • #1030
Re: Re: Sublicensing seems possible
01 Apr 2003 18:36:05 +0200
Cees de Groot <[email protected]> • #1029
RE: Debian-legal on squeak
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:55:25 -0800
Tim Rowledge <[email protected]> • #1028
re: Sublicensing seems possible
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:27:33 -0800
Craig Latta <[email protected]> • #1027
Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 21:41:27 +0100
[email protected] • #1026
Re: Final steps for harvesting
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:35:45 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #1025
Re: Handling fixes/enhancements (was Re: Possible extra text for Welcome
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 12:10:44 -0800
Tim Rowledge <[email protected]> • #1024
Stable Snapshots
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 10:21:04 -0600
Jimmie Houchin <[email protected]> • #1023
Re: Re: [FIX] Array2D>>rowAndColumnValuesDo:
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:16:37 +0100
Joern Eyrich <[email protected]> • #1022
Re: re: release process (was "Shrinking alpha image")
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 14:20:46 +0300
[email protected] • #1021
Re: 3.6 release timing (was Re: Shrinking alpha image)
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 01:22:42 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #1020
Re: updating to next version after declining alpha
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 01:22:03 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #1019
Re: re: release process (was "Shrinking alpha image")
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 01:10:17 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #1018
re: release process (was "Shrinking alpha image")
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:05:01 -0800
Craig Latta <[email protected]> • #1017
Re: updating to next version after declining alpha
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:46:48 -0700
[email protected] • #1016
RE: updating to next version after declining alpha
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:29:21 +0100
"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> • #1015
Re: Re: Shrinking alpha image (was Re: Proposal to get to the triad)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:16:38 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #1014
Re: Re: Shrinking alpha image (was Re: Proposal to get to the triad)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:34:10 +0100
[email protected] • #1013
re: Shrinking alpha image
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:31:01 -0800
Craig Latta <[email protected]> • #1012
Re: Re: Shrinking alpha image (was Re: Proposal to get to the triad)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:47:19 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #1011
Re: Decision time: Are SCG the steward of thekernel as proposed?
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:28:01 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #1010
Re: Proposed 3.5 release plan
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:11:14 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #1009
Re: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding3.4bugs?)
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 07:45:28 -0800
Ned Konz <[email protected]> • #1008
Re: Proposed 3.5 release plan
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:20:16 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #1007
Re: Decision time: Are SCG the steward of the kernel as proposed?
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 07:53:35 +0100
[email protected] • #1006
Re: Proposed 3.5 release plan
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 07:44:25 +0100
[email protected] • #1005
Re: Decision time: Are SCG the steward of the kernel as proposed?
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:34:04 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #1004
Proposed 3.5 release plan
Wed, 12 Mar 2003 01:20:33 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #1003
Re: re: 3.5 release timing
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:59:21 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #1002
Re: re: 3.5 release timing
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:18:11 -0800
Ned Konz <[email protected]> • #1001
Re: Decision time: Are SCG the steward of the kernel as proposed?
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:04:41 -0800
Ned Konz <[email protected]> • #1000
Decision time: Are SCG the steward of the kernel as proposed?
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:03:37 +0100
[email protected] • #999
Re: re: 3.5 release timing
Sun, 22 Jun 2003 14:10:30 +0000 (UTC)
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #998
Re: 3.5 release timing
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 18:38:44 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #997
RE: RE: Your stewardship(s)
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:01:34 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #996
re: 3.5 release timing
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:24:13 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #995
RE: RE: Your stewardship(s)
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 11:25:18 +0100
[email protected] • #994
RE: RE: Your stewardship(s)
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:12:51 +0100
"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> • #993
Re: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:50:39 +0100
[email protected] • #992
re: 3.5 release timing
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:41:55 -0800
Craig Latta <[email protected]> • #991
RE: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4bugs?)
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:58:33 +0100
"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> • #990
Re: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)
Sun, 09 Mar 2003 15:38:12 -0800
Tim Rowledge <[email protected]> • #989
RE: Your stewardship(s)
Sun, 09 Mar 2003 07:33:28 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #988
Re: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)
Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:05:31 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #987
RE: Your stewardship(s)
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 20:15:55 +0100
"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> • #986
Re: 3.4 press release
Sat, 08 Mar 2003 05:06:13 -0800 (PST)
Sean McGrath <[email protected]> • #985
Re: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)
Sat, 08 Mar 2003 10:08:07 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #984
Re: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 02:02:04 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #983
Re: 3.4 press release
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:00:28 -0800
John M McIntosh <[email protected]> • #982
[DOCS] Swiki as a reference manual? (was: RE: Stewards and Squeak Packages)
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:35:08 +0100
[email protected] • #981
RE: Stewards and Squeak Packages
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:48:52 +0100
[email protected] • #980
Re: 3.4 press release
07 Mar 2003 12:04:07 +0100
Cees de Groot <[email protected]> • #979
RE: Stewards and Squeak Packages
07 Mar 2003 11:57:26 +0100
Cees de Groot <[email protected]> • #978
RE: Stewards and Squeak Packages
Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:33:21 +0100
[email protected] • #977
RE: 3.4 press release
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:32:50 -0500
"Brent Vukmer" <[email protected]> • #976
FW: Stewards and Squeak Packages
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:27:32 -0500
"Brent Vukmer" <[email protected]> • #975
re: 3.4 press release
Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:08:29 -0800
Craig Latta <[email protected]> • #974
RE: Stewards and Squeak Packages
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:07:44 -0500
"Brent Vukmer" <[email protected]> • #973
3.4 press release
06 Mar 2003 22:40:08 +0100
Cees de Groot <[email protected]> • #972
Stewards and Squeak Packages
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:14:39 -0500
"Brent Vukmer" <[email protected]> • #971
Re: Future release process (was: 3.5 release timing)
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:44:35 +0100
[email protected] • #970
Future release process (was: 3.5 release timing)
Thu, 06 Mar 2003 05:06:44 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #969
Re: Re: New download page for 3.4
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:53:51 -0800
Ned Konz <[email protected]> • #968
Re: Re: New download page for 3.4
Wed, 05 Mar 2003 12:51:25 -0500
Mark Guzdial <[email protected]> • #967
Re: Re: New download page for 3.4
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:45:44 -0800
Ned Konz <[email protected]> • #966
Re: New download page for 3.4
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 09:10:44 -0800
Ted Kaehler <[email protected]> • #965
Re: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)
Tue, 04 Mar 2003 10:52:17 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #964
Re: UI editor?
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:03:27 +0100
[email protected] • #963
Re: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)
04 Mar 2003 09:03:54 +0100
Cees de Groot <[email protected]> • #962
Re: Release schedule
04 Mar 2003 08:55:54 +0100
Cees de Groot <[email protected]> • #961
Re: 3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:18:23 +0100 (MET)
Ian Piumarta <[email protected]> • #960
3.5 release timing (was Re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?)
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:45:28 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #959
Re: release prioritization (was "ClassBuilder problem")
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:13:49 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #958
UI editor?
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:13:06 -0500
Timothy <[email protected]> • #957
3.4 is now final
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:32:18 -0500
Raymond Asselin <[email protected]> • #956
[UPDATES] 3.4 is now final
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 23:49:54 -0500
Doug Way <[email protected]> • #955
re: release prioritization
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:16:13 +0100
[email protected] • #954
re: release prioritization
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:19:38 +0100
[email protected] • #953
Re: re: release prioritization (was "ClassBuilder problem")
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:06:28 +0100
[email protected] • #952
Re: Re: Collecting tests?
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:32:20 +0100
Marcus Denker <[email protected]> • #951
Re: Collecting tests?
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:49:33 +0100
[email protected] • #950
Re: re: release prioritization (was "ClassBuilder problem")
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:41:18 +0100
[email protected] • #949
RE: Collecting tests?
Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:35:35 +0100
[email protected] • #948
Re: re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?
Mon, 03 Mar 2003 02:17:04 +0300
Daniel Vainsencher <[email protected]> • #947
Re: Collecting tests?
Sat, 1 Mar 2003 09:33:55 +0100
Marcus Denker <[email protected]> • #946
Re: re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:27:44 -0800
Tim Rowledge <[email protected]> • #945
RE: Collecting tests?
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:50:58 -0500
"Brent Vukmer" <[email protected]> • #944
Re: Collecting tests?
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:42:59 +0100
Marcus Denker <[email protected]> • #943
Re: Collecting tests?
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:42:55 +0100
Marcus Denker <[email protected]> • #942
Re: Collecting tests?
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:05:36 -0800
Ned Konz <[email protected]> • #941
RE: re: Outstanding 3.4 bugs?
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:34:09 +0100
"Andreas Raab" <[email protected]> • #940
re: release prioritization
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 03:45:14 -0800
Craig Latta <[email protected]> • #939
Re: re: release prioritization (was "ClassBuilder problem")
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 06:18:38 -0500
"David T. Lewis" <[email protected]> • #938
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.